Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Gameday Thread: O's at Angels, 08/03

                           
     Erik Bedard, LH                 John Lackey, RH
     (5-3, 2.32)                     (8-4, 3.70)

Game time is 10:05 on CSN, ESPN2 and FSN West.

You may remember Lackey from game seven of the 2002 World Series. He's a hoss: 6-foot-6, 235 pounds, with a live fastball. For the first time in his major league career, he's pitching like it. Lackey's K/9 before this season: 5.74, 6.66, 6.54. This year: 9.20. That's a big jump, and one that's promising for the Angels as Lackey is still just 26 (he turns 27 in October). He's a homegrown guy, and he might be sticking around for the long haul. This has been his best big league season thus far. He does look something like a bloated Gary Gaetti.

But today, we have Bedard. Erik has not picked up a win since May 21 against the Phillies, but that's cheating, as he's pitched only thrice since then. He's lost his last two outings, though neither were truly bad performances or anything. The last one, at Chicago, was the worse of the two, as he clearly didn't have his best stuff. He did battle and kept the team in a position to win. At this point, that's all we can ask of anyone.

I had my doubts Bedard would return at the same level he left, but he's done quite well, and I really think that along with Cabrera, he's going to be part of a dynamic 1-2 punch at the top of the Baltimore rotation for years to come, unless they do something stupid like trade one of the two of them, which, you know, WHY NOT? If they waived Bedard tomorrow, it would seem almost fitting.

Every day I do one of these posts, I start feeling more and more like Harry Doyle early in Major League.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great Quote...
Harry Doyle: So, the Indians have a runner. I think I'll wet my pants.
"What's my secret for winning? That's easy. Pitching, defense, and three run homers" Earl Weaver

by elktonfan on Aug 3, 2005 3:07 PM EDT reply actions  

*snort*
Can I change it to "The Orioles just hit with runners in scoring position"?

by CarrieIC on Aug 3, 2005 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

you sure can!
"What's my secret for winning? That's easy. Pitching, defense, and three run homers" Earl Weaver

by elktonfan on Aug 3, 2005 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Optimism
I'm gonna go ahead and be optimistic and say we end the losing streak tonight.

Bedard has now been back long enough to get his strength and his stuff back, so I will say he shuts down the Angels and the O's hit a couple homers, actually get a few hits with RISP and get a big win.
And not a win that looks like we are the worst team ever. No 1-0, 2-1, or 11-10, 9-8 wins that make you feel like we're going to lose all game.

Prediction: 5-2 O's

by CStoneNo37 on Aug 3, 2005 3:36 PM EDT reply actions  

It takes a brave man
to actually predict the O's will win anything or play well enough to only allow 2 runs. God bless your optitmism. I wish you well.
"What's my secret for winning? That's easy. Pitching, defense, and three run homers" Earl Weaver

by elktonfan on Aug 3, 2005 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

if anybody
is going to pitch us to a win, I'll bet bedard.

by birdman on Aug 3, 2005 5:38 PM EDT reply actions  

RE:
I just one something to right for a change.  This is getting out of hand.
Go O's, Die Angelos- Visit my blog at marylandsportsfans.baltiblogs.com

by helimech24 on Aug 3, 2005 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

one thing
Let's all be serious about something for a second here...

How UGLY is John Lackey.  Seriously.

by CStoneNo37 on Aug 3, 2005 11:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Hmmm
Tejada is 0-3 with 3 K's...

Maybe he needs a day off?

by therobotian on Aug 3, 2005 11:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Well CStone was right...
...it is 5-2. just not for the Os.

by zknower on Aug 3, 2005 11:59 PM EDT reply actions  

we can't
seem to stop ourselves from losing. this is just ridiculous.

and I do see signs of horrible managing... bedard should have been pulled a few batter ago, and not been allowed to load the bases again.

by therobotian on Aug 4, 2005 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

yep
I was thinking when will Maz stop the bleeding? Bedard was nearing 40 pitches in the inning and obviously struggling. I don't even get excited about this anymore. I just find myself passively watching. Waiting for the disaster.

by drj on Aug 4, 2005 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maz may be a big part of the problem
I've been complaining since last year that the guy doesn't know when to pull a pitcher... at some point he has to risk his bullpen to get a win.  I can't believe this guy has routinly allowed a starting pitcher to allow 5 runs in an inning and then let them play the next inning.   Further, it irritates me to no end when the guy tries to play matchups when the reliever you have is getting outs and you replace him with a unknown factor because of a right-handed/left-handed number game... it's getting very old.

by darthpemo on Aug 4, 2005 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

absolutely
I don't know how many times (like tonight) I've seen Mazz pull Byrdak to put in Ray, right after Byrdak pitched a great at bat. How are these guys ever going to have experience against opposite handed batters without opportunities?

Or what about Kline? We know the numbers don't support moving Kline in to get left handers, or taking him out against righties. In fact, they support the opposite. So why does Mazz keep doing it?

And here's another one... Ray is in to start his second inning. That means he's already gone 1 1/3 innings, and now he's starting his second. What's up with that? I really thought we kept a lot of guys in the bullpen so we had some depth, and to keep guys from having to do this... but I guess I was wrong.

by therobotian on Aug 4, 2005 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

ESPN flashed the NL West Standings
They commented that it is impossible for someone to win the division while playing under .500 ball. I suspect that was an off the cuff remark, not necessarily based on fact. So is it possible? Can these teams basically play .500 ball against each other and blunder into a sub-.500 divisional winner? I'm rooting for that.

by drj on Aug 4, 2005 12:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

100_1952_small
Mike Flanagan's Father Delivers Acceptance Speech
Gamecock4_small
THE BULLPEN: BALTIMORE
Wieters_small
OT: CC Fantasy Baseball Keeper League

Recent FanPosts

Virginiatechvtlogo_small
Luck and sports: A 1000-year look at the 1977 American League
Fixed_small
Keith Law On Dylan Bundy
Small
Mistake in going to arbitration with Jones
Small
Korea and the O's
Southpark11_small
Traveling to Baltimore
Bflag4_small
2012: All the O's need to do is beat low expectations
Small
Bowden tweet on DD and Manny

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Official Sponsor of Camden Chat GameThreads

Tankeray_medium
Tankeray provided by dayzd toe


Bowser

Flanny_small Stacey

Koopa Troopas

Baltimore_oriole_avatar_small zknower

P1030831_small 2632

Rainbowsmall_small duck

Esskay_small Eat More Esskay

610x_small Andrew_G

Goombas

Reynolds_small birdman

Thumbnail_small j.q. higgins

Img_0927_small dfa

4840750964_54cdc24eef_small James F

091_small WestcoastO'sFan

2009_june22_philliekid3_small twistedlogic