Camden Chat: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Two amendments to the 40 Greatest Orioles list

You'll recall that I put together a 40 Greatest Orioles of All-Time list last offseason. I don't want to re-do the whole thing this year, but I did want to make some changes, and figured I could do it in a quick and dirty format.

Off -- Jeff Conine (#40 last time)

40. Gregg Olson

39. Brian Roberts
Recent allegations aside, I don't care. I've got Palmeiro and Tejada on here. Roberts had another really good season this year, his second truly ace year, and he's been serviceable two other seasons. He's still in his prime and if he stays in Baltimore, would have made the list after 2008, most likely, and higher than this. He bumps off Conine, who gave us more years, but Roberts is a Baltimore Oriole. He's been a fan favorite since becoming a regular, and someone I think we all genuinely like. I'm not saying he's the best player ever, but it's my list, I can be biased.

  1. Roberto Alomar
  2. Harold Baines
  3. Mike Boddicker
  4. BJ Surhoff
  5. Tippy Martinez
  6. Dick Hall
  7. Rick Dempsey
  8. Hoyt Wilhelm
  9. Mike Flanagan
  10. Melvin Mora
  11. Steve Barber
  12. Scott McGregor
  13. Luis Aparicio
  14. Don Buford
  15. Chris Hoiles

23. Miguel Tejada
Tejada jumps from #39 as his time in Baltimore ends. I wanted to be cautious last year with Miggi, but now that it's over and can be put into perspective, he did a lot more in his four seasons with the Birds than most guys could have in ten. It's not his fault the teams sucked, and in time, I'll forget that he complained so much because -- again -- I would have, too, if I'd come here as a marquee free agent assured that the team was going to build a contender around me, then blatantly failed to do so. He was a hell of a player for us. Had he stayed, I think it's likely he'd have jumped into the top 15, though age and decline likely would've topped him out at a spot behind Palmeiro.

  1. Jim Gentile
  2. Davey Johnson
  3. Mark Belanger
  4. Stu Miller
  5. Al Bumbry
  6. Gus Triandos
  7. Doug DeCinces
  8. Paul Blair
  9. Milt Pappas
  10. Rafael Palmeiro
  11. Bobby Grich
  12. Mike Cuellar
  13. Ken Singleton
  14. Brady Anderson
  15. Dave McNally
  16. Mike Mussina
  17. Boog Powell
  18. Frank Robinson
  19. Eddie Murray
  20. Jim Palmer
  21. Brooks Robinson
  22. Cal Ripken, Jr.

I don't think it'll be too long until Nick Markakis rightfully makes this list. And if Bedard stays around, he's got a good shot, too.

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

is there a reason why you don't make it...
an even top 50? that way we can put Mike Devereaux, Pete Incaviglia, and uhmm.. okay, so we don't have enough quality players to make a top 50 list.. I get it.

(I do like dev and inky though)

by dfleis on Dec 15, 2007 8:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fifty would be nice, but number one.......
I know it's not politically correct to say anything bad about King Ripken, but we are talking about the most over-rated player in major league history.  My Lord, it's not even close!  So he played in 2600 straight games, so what?  Were you here during that streak?  Don't you know that streak was incredibly divisive?  Everyone says what a great guy Ripken was for showing up everyday and playing, and there is much to be said for that, but dont you know that in a great many games of that streak, he simply did not deserve to play, that a great many times, he hurt his team?  I would have more respct for the guy if, instead of going out there no matter what his physical condition was, he said, "I'm going to sit because I'm not helping the team right now?" Ripken's streak became the guiding light for many decisions made by the team, from choosing the manager to deciding what players to sign.  Davey Johnson was hired for the main reason that he was the only guy with enough of a resume to tell Ripken to sit down, and hence, Ripken did sit out some innings and even played 3B for a while in 1996.  Regan couldn't do it, maybe Oates could have, but Johnson did.  And how about our hero's comments about Mike Bordick.  When Bordick was signed from Oakland before the '97 season, Ripken said that it was only for a guy like Bordick that he would move fulltime to 3B, no one else met Ripken's criteria.  And how about poor Manny Alexander?  No one is going to mistake Alex for Derek Jeter, but the facts are that Ripken treated him like crap, never offering support or encouragement and indeed doing what he could to discourage the young SS.  These facts are documented in Sun stories of the period and also from first hand knowledge from press people(I was one of them, radio reporter) who saw this first hand.  Ripken made Alex feel uncomfortable and did much to see that he would not reach his potential.  All because Alexander had the temerity to play SS and maybe, just maybe be the heir apparent.  People in the know understood that Ripken's comments about Bordick were a side shot at Alexander.  And all Alex was was a young player trying to get his start.  He did manage to play 21 games at SS in Davey's first year, but he was gone to the NL after that.  Ripken did have a pretty good year in '96, .278/26/102, but too many times in the past Sir Cal failed when the club needed him the most.  Take the "why Not" year of 1989. When the Birds were in a death struggle with BoSox for the AL East title, what did our hero do in the last month of the season? Why he hit a cool .204 with 3 HR and 15 RBI in the last 31 games. His OPS was a wonderful 641.  Way to go, Cal.  When the team needed yo the most, you weren't there.  In the second half, he hit 237 with and OPS of .678, worthy of the best three-hole hitters in the game.  For the season, he went 257/21/93, OPS of 718.  One HR and three RBI came in the the first game, and I will admit his three run jack in the seasons opening game off of Clemens probably set the tone for the year.  He didnt do anything the next year, but neither did the team.  But in 1991 really tells the tale of Ripken's worth.  An MVP year!  Wow.  But the club finished in last place, how valuable was he?  Who can forget the HR in the All-Star game?  He had truly a great year, one of the best ever for a SS, maybe the best ever.  But there was no pressure.  At least the year before he could blame(and he did) his troubles on his contract talks, before signiing his $40 million deal.  And he produced in '91. So everyone thought he was gonna have a great year in the first one at OPACY.  Yeah, right. 1992 was likely his worst year ever. The Birds were once again surprise contenders for the East, but where was Ripken?  The team was within a half game as late as September 5, when they finsihed a seven game win streak with a win over California.  After that, the Orioles went 12-15 and Ripken, while hitting 286, hit just 4 HR and drove in just 12 runs in the last 25 games, finishing the year with a 251/14/72 and a 689 OPS, his SLG dropped 200 points from the year before! Not acceptable from the team leader. But did he take off a game or two, or even move to DH?  Hell, no! Not this guy. After that, for the next few years, the team foundered and so did Ripken, until Davey took over in '96 and led the team to the playoffs in '96 and '97.  By that time, Ripken was no longer counted on to be the big gun and he had the nice year in '96, not so nice in '97, and even worse in '98 and the streak ended in '99.  His range was above league average most of those years, to be fair, and despite his lessening skills at the plate, even his last year as a full time SS, his range factor was above league average.  His first year at 3B he had 22 errors and a 949 FP, both below league average, but that can be excused due to a 36 year old player moving to a new position, his next year and his last as a full time player in '98, he had a very good defensive year.  But the steady decline in his offensive stats, his failures in the clutch during some of the O's big years, and yes I know he legitimately won the MVP in '83(not in '91) shows that for all the bluster of this guy, he just didn't live up to it, except for the streak. And for that, he is deified and I beleive he didn't warrant such deification, not when he hurt the team by continuing to play when frankly, he just didnt deserve too.  And I won't go into matters off the field. I will just say that his complex in Maryland has a Marriot Hotel to serve as the Warehouse in right field for the showcase field, AKA Cal Sr's yard.  But how does Ripken support the people that built the hotel?  He does commercials for Holiday Inn.  Nice. And dont get me started on the 90 foot diamond that hasnt been built for the past three years.  Tourney teams that play 13 and above baseball have to go to HCC or into Havre de Grace or to Aberdeen HS to play on a 90-foot diamond.  Only the semi's and champs play in the big field, Ripken stadium, home of the Ironbirds.  Dont think the visiting teams dont notice this.  All I'm saying is, before we annoit this guy the number one Oriole(my choice is number 5, followed by number 33 and number 22) just do some research and get the whole story and not just the surface.  
lookouts400

by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 1:18 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

re:
An MVP year!  Wow.  But the club finished in last place, how valuable was he?

This is, without fail, one of the stupidest arguments I can ever hear, every single time I hear it. Sorry, I cannot be convinced to buy into the idea that a guy can be more valuable than playing to the best of his ability just because the other 24 dudes on his team do or do not suck as a whole.

But you're right, let's take a shit on Cal Ripken for being one of the greatest shortstops to ever live.

Thanks for the time that you've given me...

by SC on Dec 17, 2007 7:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I applaud you
for even being able to read that.

by Stacey on Dec 17, 2007 8:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, please.......
One of the greatest SS to ever live?  What, are you insane?  Let's face it, this guy got his attention because of that streak, that's all and that streak was more important to him than anything else.  Now, how in God's name can you call him a great SS when he put his own stats above the team's???

And it's a stupid arguement about winning the MVP for a last place team? Is that what I read??? How stupid can you get?  The award says "Most VALUABLE Player".  How valuable was he?  I think they still could finished in last place without him.  You say don't penalize him because the team around him sucks?  My God, there was no pressure because the team was terrible.  He didnt have to come up in late September with runners on, two out and the East title on the line.  He didnt have to worry about advancing the runner or giving himself up.  Even a quick look at his stats in the other years I mnentioned shows he failed when he had a chance to be valuable when he was needed.  You think if he had performed like this in 1989 the O's might have actually pulled it off? Remember, Eddie was gone and it fell to Ripken to lead the team, AND HE FAILED MISERABLY!!!!!

Don't be so hard headed and close minded to just coronate this guy just becsue he played in a lot of games in a row.  Think, for bleep's sake...THINK!

lookouts400

by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

MVP
"The award says 'Most VALUABLE Player'.  How valuable was he?  I think they still could finished in last place without him."

You're just using the more Catholic definition of the MVP award.  Some people argue that a MVP award must go to someone on a winning team, other people argue that there are mitigating circumstances which should allow the award to go to someone on a losing team.  You seem to fall into the former camp.  In the end, who cares in regards to what we're discussing.  Cal's 91 season was outstanding.  OPS+ of 162 for a SS no less.  If you believe that the MVP winner must come from a winning team, fine, but don't deny that Cal's 91 was remarkable.  

by birdman on Dec 17, 2007 7:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude you are a Freak
I for one don't think Cal was the greatest player ever, however he was one of the best thing for the game itself! If not for Cal baseball might not be the game it is today ( Post 94 strike era)Cal saved the game.

Now heres where you pissed me off - #33 was one of the best players to ever where an O's uniform ( Not saying the best, that would be the fan in me) but easy top 5 or 6. I think the top 10 here is pretty close to what most would say.

by merdon1332000 on Dec 17, 2007 9:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who's your top ten?
I'm a freak?  Cool!

Aw, and I pissed off the poor baby? Eddie was clearly better than Ripken and surely a top two player.  Only Brooks meant more to this organization.

I agree, the streak helped get the game back on track, much like the great HR chase a few years later.  I just think and I will keep saying it, look at his whole body of work before he's made king of the world!  He had a marvelous career, no doubt and if any of you knuckleheads think I'm saying he didn't, you're the freak. But just look and analyze his numbers.

If he had said once, just once during that stupid streak, "I need a day off, no matter about the streak" I and many more people would have had much more respect for him.  There comes a time to say "I need a break", and Ripken put his pride above it all.  And that is not the example I would send to my teams.  team comes first, always.

Like I asked the other guy, were you here during that time?  Don't you remember the stories emanating from OPACY about teammates fed up with the way the streak took over the team, the resentment of many of the guys who surely would have been benched had they played the way Ripken was playing?  For bleep sakes, talk to any media people(and I was one)about what went on in that clubhouse.

From 50 to 12, there's going to be a lot of flip flops, these guys could fit in anywhere.  But the top ten, the best there ever was for the O's, well, let's see(since all of you are going to roast me anyway, and remember I'm a paraplegic, be nice)

10.The Booger, John Wesley Powell

  1. Gentleman Jim Gentile
  2. Mike Cuellar
  3. Dave MacNally
  4. Singy
  5. Ripken
  6. Frank Robby
  7. Cakes
  8. Eddie
  9. Brooks
And so many others that have meant so much to this town and organization, the Blade, the Bee, Wacko Dauer, tight Bobby Grich, Lee May, Scotty MacGregor, Mike Flanagan, the list goes on. All, for various reasons, could be top ten material.
lookouts400

by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah
I never said you couldn't argue. I will say you're very much wrong.

Ripken was not as good of a hitter as Murray. Murray also wasn't an Oriole as long as Ripken, and doesn't have the Orioles numbers Ripken has.

Jim Gentile is in no way, shape, or form a top 10 player in Orioles history. I like that Cuellar and McNally are somehow better than Mike Mussina, too.

Thanks for the time that you've given me...

by SC on Dec 21, 2007 5:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what the shit?
"It would behoove the Orioles to play better." - Jim Palmer

by 2632 on Dec 17, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

aoufdouafhuaf
ahufaifehuiaegfjfejk
dafjafefe

that's what happened when i hit my head on the keyboard from reading that crap

by dfleis on Dec 17, 2007 1:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

makes sense
Maybe you should try that again, makes more sense then what you would have written if you were actually looking at the keyboard.
lookouts400

by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

makes sense
A lot of the things you bring up about Cal are character issues (e.g Cal was selfish because of the streak, he wasn't nice to Manny Alexander, his business decisions regarding particular hotels).  While these things you brought up are true (e.g. wasn't nice to Manny Alexander) or debateable (e.g. the streak was selfish), 1) they are irrelevant in judging Cal as a baseball player, and 2) Cal's character should still be highly regarded.  I mean the man wasn't PERFECT.  If you scrutinize anyone close enough, I'm sure you can find something bad to say about a person.  But, as a whole, Cal's character is top-notch.  I don't think this is at all an unreasonable characterization.  Now regarding Cal as a player, Cal was unclutch because he struggled during some key stretches.  Well, that's happened to alot of HOF player.  Besides, his post season OPS is .866 which is obviously based on a small number of games but you seem to knocking Cal based on a small number of games anyways.  Overall, Cal is largely seen as redefining the position of SS.  Before Cal, SSs were defensive specialists, but Cal managed to bring some pop to the position as well.  His batting numbers weren't as impressive as Murray and other Orioles but they didn't play SS.  Let's put aside the streak, Cal is an important icon in shifting in how people view SS as a position.  That's why he's great, despite the oft pointed out negatives (e.g. being a meany to Manny, selfish because of the streak, etc.).      

by birdman on Dec 17, 2007 7:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and fwiw...
i know a lot of folks that are statistically inclined talk shit about cal based on the streak, but jay jaffe at bp has developed the JAWS system for evaluating HoFers and the average JAWS number for a shortstop is 89.7.  cal's JAWS number is 129.7 (by comparison, tony fernandez, the darling of the sporting press during most of cal's career has a JAWS of 88).
So, I said, uh, lama: how about a little something for the effort?

by jq higgins on Dec 18, 2007 6:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

in fact...
per jay jaffe:

As for Cal Ripken Jr., welcome to flavor country. His 129.2 JAWS score places him second behind only [Honus]Wagner among shortstops, and 15th overall in major league history. He's 16th based on career WARP, and an even more impressive 10th according to peak. Chew on that for a moment: we're talking about one of the 20 greatest players in baseball history, a player who's seventh-best season was worth 9.7 wins, good enough to win an MVP award in some years. Of course, given his membership in the 3,000 hit club, his record 2,632 consecutive games, and the most home runs by a shortstop, Ripken's a no-doubt choice for the Hall of Fame; he'll be close to unanimous.

The most interesting part of Ripken's candidacy may be the fact that he changed the game. I'm not talking about the feel-good aura produced by his run at Lou Gehrig's consecutive game streak, which is often credited for bringing fans back to baseball after the 1994-'95 players strike. It was his success at shortstop despite being 6'4", 225 lbs which opened the door for other big, athletic types like Jeter, A-Rod, and Tejada to play the position, a development which played no small part in moving the game more towards the high-offense era in which we currently sit. Roll over, Concepcion, and tell Mark Belanger the news.

None of which takes away from his fielding. Ripken had five seasons where he was at least 20 runs above average in the field, and including his latter-day move to third base, eight in double digits. Those years lead to some staggering WARP totals: 17.0 in 1991 (an MVP year, and the fourth-highest single-season WARP total ever), 15.0 in 1984, 13.9 in '83 (his first MVP award while playing for his only World Series winner). In his first 10 full seasons, he averaged 11.4 WARP... and I could go on. But I'll sum it up thusly: according to JAWS, he's the strongest candidate to grace the ballot since Hank Aaron.

You heard that right. Oh, and in case you're wondering who the #3 shortstop is according to JAWS, the one left out of the rankings above, it's the guy slagged on a daily basis in the tri-state area: Alex Rodriguez (112.5).

So, I said, uh, lama: how about a little something for the effort?

by jq higgins on Dec 18, 2007 6:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's awesome, jq
I love reading stuff like that. Although whenever I see that Cal has the most HR for a shortstop in baseball history, I have to chuckle because A-Rod is only one behind him in that category.

by Stacey on Dec 19, 2007 7:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

though...
after all is said and done, a-rod will have been a third basemen for at least as long if not longer than he was a shortstop.  
So, I said, uh, lama: how about a little something for the effort?

by jq higgins on Dec 19, 2007 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Orioles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Desert Dogs Championship Thread
Small
Which players have you met?
Small
Reunite the "Why Not?" Orioles on RBI Baseball 2
0207_large_small
Oriole Park Rated #1
Brad-bergesen_away_small
A Long-Term Deal for Dr. Jones?
Small
Project Prospect report on Josh Bell
Small
2010 CHONE projections for BAL Hitters
11405642_small
Trading for a True Ace?
11405642_small
Dan Uggla at 3B/DH
Ritm_small
Dr. Jones is a Gold Glover

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium