Camden Chat: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Sun: Segui doubts Roberts' involvement

Source: The Sun

This is an interesting article. David Segui -- who has had no problem cooperating whatsoever and is mentioned several times in the Mitchell Report -- is in doubt that Brian Roberts was actually involved in anything.

"By far that's the thing that's bothered me the most about the whole entire thing," Segui said today. "[Bigbie] threw Brian Roberts' name out on complete hearsay. Calling it hearsay would be giving it more credibility than it deserves. I'm at a loss as to why Brian Roberts' name would come out of his mouth."

Bigbie, who has signed to play in Japan in 2008, could not be reached for comment. Roberts and his agent did not return phone calls to The Sun.

In the Mitchell Report, Bigbie makes assertions about his own drug use and said that it was Segui who introduced him both to steroids and to Kirk Radomski, the former New York Mets clubhouse attendant who has admitted to supplying dozens of players with human growth hormone and performance-enhancers.

Segui said that much is true, and he admitted to educating Bigbie on steroids -- after the rookie persisted -- and giving Bigbie a sample of his own stash while Bigbie waited on his first shipment from Radomski.

But Segui contends that several other statements were fabricated, including the large quantity of steroids Bigbie initially took and allegations that Segui injected Bigbie and oversaw the rookie's drug cycles.

The most egregious inaccuracy in the testimony, Segui said, is Bigbie's recollection of a lunch in New York during the 2003 season. Bigbie told Mitchell that he, Segui, Radomski and Roberts dined together and then later Bigbie sat in Radomski's car and watched Segui buy "performance enhancing substances and paraphernalia." Bigbie said Roberts was not in the car at the time.

Segui said Roberts wasn't there at all -- that instead, Segui's son, Cory, then 11, was with them at lunch. Segui added that not only didn't he buy drugs from Radomski that day, but that he didn't purchase anything illegal from Radomski after 2002.

"Brian Roberts has never met Kirk Radomski, at least not in my presence," said Segui, who has admitted to taking steroids and to providing Radomski's contact information to several players who wanted to know more about performance-enhancers. "And I don't know wherever else he would have met him."

He refrained from offering more discrepancies to Bigbie's statements, instead saying he wanted to focus on Roberts.

"I'm not worried about damage control on my part, I don't care about that," Segui said. "What I care about is Brian Roberts. He is the kind of guy you want your daughter to marry. He is the kind of guy you want your son to grow up to be. Leave him out of this [stuff]. He has nothing to do with this."

Listen, I'm not naive. If Brian Roberts was a legit name that should be mentioned, it would not surprise me, and I really, truly, would not feel differently about him. He'd still be one of my favorite players.

But if Brian Roberts' name is being dragged through the mud for little t no reason -- and this is not just Segui, sportswriters like Jayson Stark have said the same thing -- then that is horseshit on the part of both Larry Bigbie and George Mitchell.

0 recs  |  Comment 10 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Yeah
Bigbie is a piece of shit, he told Mitchell that Brian told him was that he had tried taking Steorids and/or performance enhancing drugs once or twice? Where is the in-depth research that Mitchell supposedly did on every player before throwing their name on the report.  At this point David has a lot of credibility because he did admit to taking steroids and provided legitimate names because he really has nothing to lose now.

by Baltimo on Dec 15, 2007 12:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not Bigbie
I don't really blame Bigbie. He was being put under a lot of pressure. The blame goes on Mitchell for including this crap in the report.

by crawjo on Dec 15, 2007 3:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

right as rain

Thanks for the time that you've given me...

by SC on Dec 15, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he named names
"He was being put under a lot of pressure."

I've heard a lot people say this and I've wondered what were the consequences if someone didn't name names.  Did Mitchell have any power to legally prosecute anyone for possessing a legal substance in the past?

by birdman on Dec 16, 2007 1:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No...
but some of the people who were involved in criminal cases were given some leniency in exchange for cooperating with Mitchell.

I don't know the specifics of Bigbie's case, but it is possible that he was offered to be treated more leniently, or not prosecuted, if he cooperated with the investigation. But I'm just speculating here--I don't know if Bigbie was in any legal jeopardy (although he was clearly and admittedly involved in illegal activity). Certainly Mitchell had the means to apply pressure, even if he didn't have the ability to prosecute anyone.

While I don't like the way Roberts' was named in this investigation, at this point his silence on the probably tells us a lot.

It's looking more and more like the Mitchell Report has failed to keep Congress happy, and they want to do their own investigations. So get ready for an orgy of name naming, righteous indignation and pontificating by holier-than-thou politicians and sportswriters.

by rebop on Dec 16, 2007 10:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

bigbie
He must in some sort of legal trouble or else he would have told Mitchell to fuck off like every other player.  

by birdman on Dec 16, 2007 9:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Leniency
The deal was: they were immune from criminal prosecution provided they didn't lie to the committee.

If it was determined later that they had lied about anything, their entire immunity agreement would be revoked.

It was supposed to be incentive for them to, you know, tell the truth.


It's just a question of arrogant self-entitlement against drunken limp-dicked self-loathing--DaBB

by zknower on Dec 17, 2007 5:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Free B-Rob!
"True friends stab you in the front."-Oscar Wilde.

by NHZ on Dec 15, 2007 5:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

re:
Bigbie also fully cooperated with the report.

And Segui may have an interest in discrediting Bgbie, since Bigbie lays a lot of blame at Segui's feet.

This would be the case of comparing the word of one steroid-using ex-MLB player to another.

just sayin'.


It's just a question of arrogant self-entitlement against drunken limp-dicked self-loathing--DaBB

by zknower on Dec 16, 2007 7:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Orioles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Flying-dog_cap_small
More home runs, please
Small
Desert Dogs Championship Thread
Small
Which players have you met?
Small
Reunite the "Why Not?" Orioles on RBI Baseball 2
0207_large_small
Oriole Park Rated #1
Brad-bergesen_away_small
A Long-Term Deal for Dr. Jones?
Small
Project Prospect report on Josh Bell
Small
2010 CHONE projections for BAL Hitters
11405642_small
Trading for a True Ace?
11405642_small
Dan Uggla at 3B/DH

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium