Buck Martinez remains an idiot
This morning on Baseball This AM on XM they were discussing the NL Cy Young winner TIm Lincecum and Mark Patrick says that he's surprised it was such a landslide seeing as how Brandon Webb had so many more wins to which Buck Martinez replies, "When you're evaluating a pitcher the first thing you look at is wins." WHY is he so stupid? Then some guy calls in and gives Buck the what for about how that's the most ridiculous thing you can say and I'm laughing because it's the same sort of thing I want to say to stupid baseball announcers all the time. Buck's response? "Say what you want about ERA and other stats, but ask any pitcher if he'd rather have a low ERA or a win and he'll say win every time." Which, DUH, Buck, but that doesn't make the guy with more wins a better pitcher.
FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
I'm a big fan of Webb
But if anyone got jobbed it was Santana. Led the league in ERA and IP.
And yeah, I just love that argument when people defend Wins. You hear nearly the same argument when people evaluate players based on championships.
"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle
by BirdFanInPhilly on Nov 12, 2008 9:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
well...
wins are better than saves?
Ugh, I just wish ex-ballplayers could get a clue, but I suppose most of them are incapable.
by pipkin on Nov 12, 2008 9:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
As much as I hate “Wins” as a stat; I think “Saves” is even worse. It’s such an arbitrary way to measure a pitcher.
"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle
by BirdFanInPhilly on Nov 12, 2008 9:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i know
I was saying that in that weird valley-girl-esque way where I’m searching for something to say so I phrase it in the form of a question
the save is the stupidest statistic in baseball. well, second stupidest. there’s still the hold.
by pipkin on Nov 12, 2008 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I think hold is better than save
At least it removes the ideal tha tthe ninth inning is somehow the only inning that matters for a reliever.
"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle
by BirdFanInPhilly on Nov 12, 2008 11:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you have a good point
the counterpoint is that the hold is like throwing good money after bad, making-up-stats-wise
by pipkin on Nov 12, 2008 11:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But without "Saves"...
… you couldn’t have “Blown Saves”, which I think is a very good stat.
"Whether your name is Gehrig or Ripken, DiMaggio or Robinson, or that of some youngster who picks up his bat or puts on his glove, you are challenged by the game of baseball to do your very best day in and day out. That's all I've ever tried to do."
by spike2131 on Nov 14, 2008 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
in 2001...
Buck Martinez would have taken Paul Abbott (17-4, 4.25/1.42, 98 ERA+) over John Burkett (12-12, 3.04/1.18, 147 ERA+).
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on Nov 12, 2008 10:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I met Buck once
He was the only dude without a line for an autograph at the Orioles fanfest one year.
I dunno, it’s not as bad as it used to be, I’m sure. I actually hear the words ‘quality start’ a lot from announcers.
The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST
by the fix is in on Nov 12, 2008 10:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on Nov 12, 2008 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
is that from reality...
or a wwe/f skit?
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 12, 2008 11:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
reality
To be fair it’s from before the whole thing opened, but it’s such a sad photo.
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on Nov 12, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
man...
he doesn’t LOOK very super, though, admittedly when i stopped following wrestling, he was just ted dibiase’s bodyguard.
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 12, 2008 1:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, Mike Jones
Poor bastard was just a pawn for his whole career. He was named “Virgil” because Vince McMahon wanted to mock Dusty Rhodes (born Virgil Runnels, Jr.). In WCW, they renamed him “Vince”, and later “Shane”, for obvious reasons.
I suppose it could be worse…TNA could hire him to wrestle as “Stephanie”.
by Brotz13 on Nov 12, 2008 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't that bad a career
He got to run with the “Million Dollar Man” Ted Dibiase and was in the NWO, albeit in its dying stages.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Nov 13, 2008 1:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he was in the nWo during their good run
Not the super super super hot period right at the VERY start, but fairly early.
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on Nov 13, 2008 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Had a solid career, no doubt
There are lots of guys who would’ve killed to be steadily employed in the Big Two for around a decade. It’s just a little funny/lame that all of his character names were the result of the infighting between those companies.
by Brotz13 on Nov 13, 2008 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs














