Coco Crisp traded to Royals
From Yahoo
BOSTON (AP)—Outfielder Coco Crisp was traded from the Boston Red Sox to the Kansas City Royals on Wednesday for reliever Ramon Ramirez.
Royals general manager Dayton Moore called the switch-hitting Crisp a “championship-caliber player” who will help Kansas City move forward. Crisp is a career .280 batter in seven seasons with the Cleveland and the Red Sox.
The 29-year-old stared 98 games for the Red Sox last season while sharing the center field job with rookie Jacoby Ellsbury. He stole 20 bases in 27 attempts, marking the third season in a row he’s reached the 20-steal mark.
The trade frees up some money for Boston. Crisp is owed $5.75 million next season, with an $8 million club option for 2010 or a $500,000 buyout.
Ramirez is a 27-year-old right-hander who had a 2.64 ERA in 71 2-3 innings last season.
Apparently the Royals just HATE having good relievers so they're going to trade them all away.
FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.
0 recs |
38 comments
Comments
Looks like good value for the Red Sox
Hopefully Ellsbury crashes and burns next year as the starter.
by dkdc on Nov 19, 2008 1:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well
I would trade A Jones for Ellsbury in a heart beat.
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 1:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why?!
Most scouts suggest Jones will be a better overall player then Ellsbury because of his latent power stroke. Sure Ellsbury is faster and plays slightly better defense, but Jones has the ability to hit 20-25 homers a season.
by Dr Orpheus on Nov 19, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Jones hit 25 HRs in 2007 at AAA.
Ellsbury has hit 22 HRs in his entire professional career (minors and majors).
Jones is also 2 years younger than Ellsbury, and he may be a better defender.
by dkdc on Nov 19, 2008 1:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely do not see
Jacoby Ellsbury being a better defender than Adam Jones.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Nov 19, 2008 8:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't even want to break that down
But that would be a bad, bad trade for Baltimore.
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on Nov 19, 2008 4:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
@ Sanders833
You’re fired.
I always say follow your dreams...even if they're about a giant spider with your father's head, and he keeps stealing your p*nis!
by Ghost of Floyd Rayford on Nov 19, 2008 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
At first I thought you meant Andruw Jones
And I thought, “Yeah I’d do that too.” However, Adam Jones is better than both of them.
"Hats for bats, keep bats warm." Pedro Cerrano
by wscott on Nov 19, 2008 8:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ellsbury=Damon
Ellsbury is faster (yeah like 50-70 stolen bases), also has developing power (see John Damon), a table setter, better defensively.
The age thing makes no difference since both are young unless you want to make the argument that Jones will suddenly burst forth with more and more improvement (which I will buy a little but not that much). I think Ellsbury will also get better.
I still am not quite sure what kind of player Jones will become. Yes, he has a latent power stroke. I did see a lot of comparision to Mike Cameron.
Would you rather have Mike Cameron or a Johnny Damon (that also plays defense)?
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 1:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Would you rather have Mike Cameron or a Johnny Damon (that also plays defense)?
I don’t know if it’s a safe assumption that the power will come for Ellsbury. Jones has at least shown power in the minors (25 HRs in AAA in 2007).
Zartan says, "Sign Dan Johnson."
by birdman on Nov 19, 2008 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Different players
Jones and Ellsbury will offer different abililites although in about the same amount of at bats they both hit 9 homers in 2008. I remember seeing Ellsbury hit a number of line drives into the triangle at Boston, he can hit with more power then you think.
Ellsbury will be a table setter, base stealer with good defensive skills. He should easily score 125 runs batting leadoff with 40-60 steals and still hit 12-15 homers and knock in 65-70 rbis.
I think Adam will be a fine player. 20-25 homers hopefully is a norm. The avg and consistency are still to be determined as he went through first year growing pains as did Ellsbury. I just think in the end, Ellsbury will be that unique table setter who can also play great defense. You can find 20 homer hitters a little more cheaply. Marcus Thames and Luke Scott come to mind. But it doesnt make them great players. Adam offers more then either of those. He has nice speed and is learning in CF. I just lean to Ellsbury and it makes for great debate.
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 2:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I just think in the end, Ellsbury will be that unique table setter who can also play great defense.
Jones’ defense isn’t shabby either and I’m not sure what you mean by table setter. If you mean lead off hitter, that’s nice but Jones will fit in a good number 2 hitter which is pretty valuable as well. Between power (Jones) and speed or “table setting” skills (Ellsbury), I’ll take power especially from a CF.
Zartan says, "Sign Dan Johnson."
by birdman on Nov 19, 2008 2:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would KC do this?
Taking on Crisp’s $6M salary plus giving up probably your best MR for 1 year of a mediocre CF??? Makes no sense to me.
"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle
by BirdFanInPhilly on Nov 19, 2008 2:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's why the Royals are the Royals
Kinda like how the O’s always sign guys one contract later than their prime: i.e. Kevin Millar, Ramon Hernandez, Steve Trachsel, Omar Daal, Danys Baez…
Duck Around - a progressive blog about the Eastern Shore of Maryland. And getting off my lawn.
by duck on Nov 20, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
why
“Taking on Crisp’s $6M salary plus giving up probably your best MR for 1 year of a mediocre CF??? Makes no sense to me.”
Crisp also has an 8 million option so he has two years of control.
Dayton Moore traded JP Howell for Gaitright. That worked out. For Tampa Bay. Crisp is a better player and I suspect Moore is going to trade Teahan or Dejesus for a starting pitcher (Sean Marshall maybe?).
Other wise, just like his signing of Mike Jacobs, he is just moving around puzzle pieces and giving up his young bullpen arms. I suspect he figures he has replacement arms in the minors. But still, unless you can acquire starting pitching, its a hard go.
Leo Nunez, Ramon Ramirez and Soria were a good, young, cheap bullpen. Seems he is trying to fix one problem and creating a bigger one. Have to wait and see where that all shakes out.
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 2:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
well...
it seems to me that they’re biggest problem was scoring runs. teahen, butler and gathright were a big part of that. even if, say, crisp performs at the level he performed at last year, that’s a huge upgrade over gathright.
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 19, 2008 4:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gaithright
I know he is horrible with the bat but that’s one fast MFer.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Nov 19, 2008 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he can jump over cars too
And Crisp would be replacing DeJesus since he is scheduled to CF next year w/o Crisp.
Zartan says, "Sign Dan Johnson."
by birdman on Nov 19, 2008 5:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so?
corey patterson is really fast too and is also not good at baseball. come on.
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 19, 2008 7:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
you missed the part about him being horrible. I know he’s horrible, you know he’s horrible. Just stating that he was fast. So…COME ON.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Nov 20, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ah, so...
not a defense of the man, just stating for the record? gotcha.
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 20, 2008 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
probably came off like that though. I was in town for two games against KC last summer and running down a couple of long fly balls was about the only impressive thing I saw from him. I think he only played one game though. That was D-Cabs CG. Sorry if defensive…dealing with bank examiners this week.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Nov 20, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
haha...
i deal w/ examiners, too. good times.
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 20, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's fun!
I especially enjoy the few that are really smug whenever they come and ask you something. Something about that, “HA! Got you!” attitude really tics me off. Luckily we’ve got a pretty solid group though. I think they’ll be gone by next week’s holiday and I know they have bigger fish to fry.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Nov 20, 2008 5:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know if the “oppurtunity” to pay Crisp $8M to play in 2010 makes this deal any more attractive.
"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle
by BirdFanInPhilly on Nov 20, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll take power especially from a CF
I think we will just have to agree to disagree. I like power from anywhere.
I just happen to think Ellsbury will be a very unique player for years to come.
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 3:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
well
I agree.
Lets say the lineup is Crisp, Aviles, Dejesus, Guillen, Jacobs, Gordon, Butler, Buck/Olivo and I think Grundy is back. A lot of how next year looks offensively will rest on Gordon and Butler taking the next step.
Butler, Shealy and Teahan are rumored on the table and maybe Buck. Dont know what they might bring. I think they need starting pitcher for sure, a 2b and more power. Still in a division that ebbs and flows like the central that offense is an improvement.
by sanders833 on Nov 19, 2008 4:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
dude
there’s a reply button for a reason. you’re making this thread confusing
also, you’re so, so wrong about ellsbury vs. aj
by pipkin on Nov 20, 2008 7:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the tip, dude
Well I guess we will find out about Ellsbury and Jones in the future. Sometimes we let the fact the player is ours blind us to his true capabilities. AJ looked a lot like Mike Cameron to me right down to holes in his strike zone. And AJ isnt Mike Cameron in the field. Again, AJ will be a very good player. I will take Jacoby and since we dont have him I will be more then happy to have AJ in center for us.
I was ready to trade Adam Jones for Matt Cain. Any interest in that?
How about Weiters for Lester, Ellsbury and Masterson?
by sanders833 on Nov 20, 2008 2:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not this again
No way do you even consider trading Wieters, especially for three players who are not proven stars. Lester’s had one very good year.
No to Dr. Jones for Cain. You don’t fix your pitching staff by creating holes in your lineup, particularly by ditching a 22-year-old five-tool player who is under team control for several years and who got better as his first full season progressed. If the injury in the second half doesn’t occur, his numbers look even better.
by Brotz13 on Nov 20, 2008 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dr. Jones
I dont disagree with you. I just have my mad hat on. I am a little concerned that Adam’s OBP is just about the same as his batting avg which means he is going to be a very streaky hitter. Think high side Torri Hunter and low side Mike Cameron and not quite the defensive player that either of those two are.
I offered both trades to juice things up. I think at the moment though its hard to say Ellsbury, Lester and Masterson arent proven players.
Make the two trades, add AJ Burnett and your staff is Cain, Guthrie, Burnett, Lester and Masterson.
Trade Rad Liz and Jake Arrietta to Texas and get your catcher.
Your ready to compete.
Just call me Dr. No!
by sanders833 on Nov 20, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Your ideas are intriguing, but...
you can’t trade Wieters at this point. We have invested way too much money and hope in this undeniable talent. I do like your starting 5, but I am unwilling to go the suggested route to get it.
by sickuvitall on Nov 20, 2008 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I will take Jacoby.
I just get why, that’s all. Your argument seems to come down to speed (i.e., steals or “table setting” skills, defense). I think Ellsbury will steal more bases and provide slightly better defense (although I hear Jacoby doesn’t take good routes), but I’ll take Adam’s power over Ellbury’s speed.
How about Weiters for Lester, Ellsbury and Masterson?
I don’t think the RS would trade Lester for a prospect even of Wieter’s caliber. But adding three players of that caliber would be nice especially if Jones/Ellsbury traded for a good young starer.
Zartan says, "Sign Dan Johnson."
by birdman on Nov 20, 2008 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
actually...
by hardball times zone rating, adam jones was significantly better than ellsbury in center (though ellsbury was still pretty good).
.953-.939
"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."
--Jerry Reed, on acting
by j.q. higgins on Nov 20, 2008 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How about...
we genetically splice Adam Jones and Jacoby Ellsbury…we’ll call him, oh I don’t know, Jacoby Jones. He will be extremely fast with developing power and all the girls will hoot and holler upon seeing him enter the room!!
by sickuvitall on Nov 20, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldnt it be scary
if in a 100 years from now that would be the new “farm system” for teams….
by sanders833 on Nov 20, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In that case...
I have a few other ideas for players…how does a Cal Murray or Brooks Powell sound?
by sickuvitall on Nov 20, 2008 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's have Jacoby E. AND Adam Jones
And then we don’t have to have this argument. With Nick M. in right, a ball would never touch the ground in the outfield. You would have to hit it out every time or make an our.
by Lothar on Nov 20, 2008 4:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs























