Camden Chat: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Olson for Pie rumor

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-orioles1129,0,3629851.story

I'm a Cubs fan, but I grew up in Maryland and love Camden Yards.

I'll be honest, I don't get this for Baltimore.  For the Cubs, Pie has become a spare part, with Fukudome's contract giving him the lefty platoon rights to center field.

I don't see the point of adding Pie.  Jones/Markakis is a nice combo.  Let Reimold get a shot, amongst others.

Also, at the cost of Olson?  Olson still looks like a solid mid-rotation lefty.  Is a 3rd OF needed?

Now, to be fair, the article doesn't say 1 for 1, so maybe we wait and see, but I fail to see what other pieces that the Cubs would likely be willing to add to make this deal make sense, IMO, for Baltimore.Even, say, Pie/Cedeno would still seem iffy to me, although that's a better gamble (but the Cubs might have to keep Cedeno for the Padres).  I don't know if the Cubs want to move Fontenot, but he would make sense, giving the flexibility to move Roberts.

FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.

0 recs  |  Comment 62 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Question:

How is it that Pie has been relegated to ‘spare part’ status after only 260 major league ABs?
His minor league numbers are very good, he’s only 23 years old… ??

From the Land of Pleasant Living...

by OEutaw on Nov 29, 2008 8:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

more because the cubs are in a win now mode

and there isn’t a role for him. another year of sitting on the bench or AAA will sap a lot more value away, and the chances of him beating out fukudome seem slim, and moving fukudome is unlikely.

by toonsterwu on Nov 29, 2008 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

pie for Olson?

If the Orioles can get Pie for Olson they should do that in a second. We’d then have to trade Pie or Reimold, but I think Pie is way better than Olson, though maybe I’m just down on Olson and don’t know enough about Pie…

Librarians are hiding something

by dfa on Nov 29, 2008 8:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Really?

The Cubs have all but given up on Pie, and while I’m fairly low on Olson (he’s a decent young pitcher but he’s not really a 1 or a 2 is he?) Getting Pie right now isn’t really a monster coup. The thing is the Cubs have mishandled this kid pretty badly.

That said, I don’t think he’s toast, but I don’t know if he’s worth what he was like 2-3 years ago ago.. Any chance the Cubs could roll someone like Huff into this deal… I just don’t know how this makes sense.. for the Cubs because of the cost of Peavy ($$$$) and the rumours about their payroll. How’s the Teix hunt going?

by cubsfan2883 on Nov 29, 2008 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

exchange of prospects who have lost their luster?

I don’t think Olson can be much more than a 4/5 pitcher which just isn’t all that valuable from my perspective. Pie still has “upside” I guess. It seems like Olson is the “safer” choice but perhaps Pie is more of a gamble. Olson seems to me more of a guy with AAAA stuff, but maybe that’s because he just blends in with all the Oriole pitchers outside of Guthrie.

Re: Huff…I think MacPhail holds Huff in higher esteem than other teams do (shocking I know). He’s got one year left on his deal but I think both he and Roberts are like kidney stones for MacPhail. (sorry if that simile was a lil gross).

Re: Teixeira…I think it’s more of a dream personally. But Teixeira is said to be the apple of Angelos’ eye, so we’ll see. I just don’t know why he’d sign with the Orioles even if he grew up an Oriole fan.

Librarians are hiding something

by dfa on Nov 29, 2008 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

re: olson

i think he has your typical middle of the rotation lefty potential, but whether or not he reaches it is a question of consistency. A low 90’s fastball paired with a strong curve and a usable split-change? is enough of an arsenal.

by toonsterwu on Nov 29, 2008 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather have Olson

Pie’s value tied to being CF. In taking a look at his minor league numbers, it doesn’t look he can hit enough to hold a corner OF spot. Olson has a stellar minor league record. He might just a little more time, or he might just suck, but I would rather keep him over a guy who covers a filled position (CF).

by birdman on Nov 29, 2008 8:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Reimold

Yet again we are given reason to believe that the organization does not believe in Noland, at all.

"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law

by Reddrummer9187 on Nov 29, 2008 8:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Do you believe in him?

His name is Nolan :)

"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"

by exitfare on Nov 29, 2008 11:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

damn

I cant type or spell, whichever it was at the time.

"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law

by Reddrummer9187 on Dec 1, 2008 12:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s more about stockpiling talent an indictment of Reimold.

by birdman on Nov 30, 2008 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather have a not so good pitching prospect

rather than a not so good OF prospect

"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"

by exitfare on Nov 29, 2008 11:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

olson for peavy!

What up?

by snakethejake on Nov 30, 2008 12:43 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Don't like this deal

Reddrummer mentioned that this indicates that the FO doesn’t believe in Reimold, but to me, the more important name is Luke Scott. He’s cheap and productive, and really seemed to be an integral part of our team last year (of course, the statheads cant quantify this). People say that it’d be easy to move him to DH and put Huff at 1B, but I still don’t like the idea of taking his job away (lots of hitters don’t like to DH) and of assuming Huff’s 1B defense can fly full-time.

As for Reimold, whatever. There are still people on the hangout who swear that he could do what Luke does, which I think is beyond absurd. A player who’s not been able to stay healthy, whom scouts question, and who just put up an .850 OPS at AA at age 24 (as a corner outfielder, and with good lineup protection) isn’t exactly overwhelming.

With the state of our rotation, giving up on Olson, who has rock solid minor league numbers, without addressing a need, seems foolish.

by U2boy417 on Nov 30, 2008 1:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Luke Scott

First of all, you’re walking on dangerous ground talking about attributes that can’t be quantified. It’s quantifiable stats that win games. Not “grit” and “leadership”. That being said, Scott makes a lot of sense right now. His OBP was league average and his OPS was over .800. His defense isn’t great, but Jones and Markakis offset this a bit. For where the team is right now he’s acceptable. When they are rebuilt, it isn’ t that difficult to find corner outfielders on the free agent market. They’ll have to pay for one, but they are there. This year Burrell, Ibanez, and Ramirez are available this year with even more guys available for trade. Last season, there was Vernon Wells, Torii Hunter, and Fukudome. Baltimore’s need is pitching. In the next couple of years, Baltimore will need to get four starters from somewhere. So, if there is any chance at all that Olson will work out, Baltimore must keep him (unless they can get a good young ss for him).

by uneasy rider on Nov 30, 2008 6:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Olson

Olson would probably find success in the sissy hitting NL, thats why San DIego seems to get going after him so hard. I’m all for trading him to an NL team, and wouldn’t mind Pie, but the O’s have more pressing needs than OF.

by UMterp08 on Nov 30, 2008 9:31 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

SD is a pitcher's park

"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"

by exitfare on Nov 30, 2008 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This makes no sense at all

Unless we’re going to flip Pie. (heh). We have, IMHO, 4 OFs (Nick, Jones, Scott/Montanez, which may not be the best platoon, but hey) and Reimold on the way (who will be another Luuuke).

As for Olsen, I still think he’s got promise, but he needs to get his head together. I’m sure the trial by fire shook him up a lot, but he needs to get over it. I’m sure PETCO would give him lots of confidence, but we need to get somethign more out of this.

Curt never met a buttered roll he didn't like.

by CoachOfEarl on Nov 30, 2008 11:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pie

Some of this is going to come down to Orioles evaluations of Reimold, Pie and Olsen.

First about Olsen. The only O’s pitcher who really has pitched at Triple A with success. Ok so he struggled. Seems a couple other hot shot pitchers last year struggled named Hughes and Buchholz and I dont see their teams throwing them away. Not comparing the three, just saying the learning process isnt always easy. Not everyone is Tim Lincecum (had to work him in just to feel bad). There is nothing wrong with being a solid number three SP.

Why doesnt Towers want Pie? Why doesnt Chicago want Pie? Why does Towers want Olsen? Dont tell me Towers wants pitchers. So do the O’s. Seems we have two teams passing on Pie and one wanting Olsen and of course the Cubs have better 6, 7 options then the O’s (Marshall, Gaudin) have at 2 and 3.

Keep Olsen. Still try to get Pie because Chicago wont have a spot for him, if you dont then move on to another option. Why give a ML ready pitcher (Olsen) when its your teams biggest need unless you clearly believe Olsen will never develop.

If we get Pie then we have a legit left fielder, who can run and throw and under team control. Can he hit? Luke Scott can DH and Huff’s at first and Reimold and Montanez can show up at spring training (heck he wasnt invited last year, what does that say?) and win a job.

In the end this trade wont work because the O’s and SD should want the same things. Young ML ready starting pitching.

Now maybe if the Cubs would add Chad Gaudin to Felix Pie you could revisit this.

Looks like this. O’s get Pie and Gaudin. SD gets Olsen, Marshall and Vitters and Cubbies get Peavy.

by sanders833 on Nov 30, 2008 12:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If we get Pie then we have a legit left fielder, who can run and throw and under team control.

Could someone explain why Pie projects as a LF? In looking at his minor league numbers, he looks like a classic CF. His tore up AAA in a limited number of bats but he was repeating the league. numbers. Otherwise, his numbers don’t look like someone who can hold a cornor OF spot.

by birdman on Nov 30, 2008 4:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because Jones is in CF

Yeah, that’s what I was afraid of.

by birdman on Nov 30, 2008 6:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I am more scared about

is once you take out Matt, Pie would become our best positional prospect. What is really bad is the best team (Cubbies) and the worst team (Padres) both dont want him apparently.
That is what really scares me.

by sanders833 on Dec 1, 2008 12:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

let's face it

if the Orioles liked this deal then it would be done by now. but it’s not done, and they don’t like it for the exact same reason that they didn’t jump on a Greene-Olsen 1-for-1, which was even more relevant given that SS is position we need to fill. along the lines of sanders833’s thinking, Pie will be bundled. this won’t be because Olsen is so valuable that he should get us a pitcher + Pie, but because the Cubs so badly want to add Peavy to their rotation. rather than Gaudin though, i think Marquis is more likely, with the Cubs eating $3-$4 million.

Marquis adds that experienced 3-spot we’ve been supposedly looking for, along the logic of bringing in a Derek Lowe or Byrd, to allow Guthrie to develop without feeling the weight of carrying the rotation. plus, Marquis is cheaper than those guys given that the Cubs will probably eat some. now, if the Orioles can pull off A.J.

1. Guthrie
2. Burnett
3. Marquis
4. insert young arm here
5. insert young arm here

is a vastly better rotation than last year.

Furthermore, a Scott/Pie platoon gives us a stronger lineup against lefties, coverage in CF if Jones gets hurt or needs a day off, backup at DH for Huff, and simply the best young outfield defense in baseball.

by jared.sager on Nov 30, 2008 4:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gaudin

I actually like Gaudin here because he would be under team control for it looks like three years although his service time has to be calculated. Marquis is a one year fix.

Gaudin struck out 154 with 100 walks two years ago with a sore hip hurting his year end numbers, then dramatically reduced his walk rate last year. I think he is worth a look. At worst he fills a role like Matt Albers did last year at best he is in the rotation.

I will say this, I would offer Cabrera to the Cubs for Marquis and maybe take his entire salary the net effect being about 6.8 which is reasonable in terms of a one year salary. I almost fear we keep Cabrera and somehow he turn’s in a year like Edwin Jackson (some wins with lousy whip and lowered k’s) and we would think about signing him to a long term deal.

So say we give them Olsen (which I am still not entirely sold on) and Cabrera and get Pie, Gaudin and Marquis. The Cubs probably move Olsen, Marshall and Vitters and they keep Cabrera to take on the same role that Gaudin had with the Cubs. They also get rid of Marquis’s salary. The difference is we wind up with three years of Gaudin and let Cabrera go and still get Marquis to eat innings. Plus we get Pie.

I still think Andy Mac wants to keep Olsen, let the Peavy deal die down and then still try to get Marquis and Pie maybe for Daniel Cabrera (to dump Marquis’s salary) and yes Luke Scott.

by sanders833 on Nov 30, 2008 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gaudin

don’t get me wrong, i see the upside of Gaudin, i just also think the Cubs also see the upside of him and he might be more difficult to pry loose than Marquis. i think getting Pie and Marquis for Olsen is good trade, but getting Cabrera for Gaudin to add to that seems a little less realistic.

i like how in my rotation layout i didn’t even take Cabrera into account. i guess because the other issue with beginning to factor Cabrera into this trade is that the Orioles will have to tender when i don’t think they should.

by jared.sager on Nov 30, 2008 6:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

new lineup

I could get into this:

2B- Brian Roberts (unless traded)
RF- Nick Markakis
1B- Aubrey Huff (unless traded) (Texiera?)
DH- Luke Scott (vs RHP), Lou Montanez (v LHP)
CF- Adam Jones
C- Matt Wieters
LF- Pie (vs LHP)/ Nolan Reimold (v RHP)
3B- Melvin
SS- Cesar Izturis

that’s a pretty legit lineup, and a pretty spectacular defensive alignment (excepting 1st and 3rd), and Olson isn’t worth anything to us anyway. Let him pitch in PETCO, give the Padres a 4.50 ERA in the back of the rotation.

This provides us with greater flexibility if we want to move Huff or Luuuke, and we aren’t giving up anything that we’d miss.

Also, Pie’s PECOTAs going into this year:

420 62 24 4 13 51 30 81 13 5 2.3 .291 .345 .480 .079 .285 .340 .471 .273 21.5 100-CF 0 3.8

by ItsBenFeldman on Nov 30, 2008 5:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

correction

that should say Pie vs RHP, reimold v LHP

by ItsBenFeldman on Nov 30, 2008 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We can give up Montanez

I won’t miss him

"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"

by exitfare on Nov 30, 2008 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Olsen isnt worth anything to us?

Look, we have to find 65% quality starts (6 inn, 3 runs) out of 162 or I dont really care what the offense looks like but I do like improving the defense and bullpen.

Lets see a 4.5 era is by far our second best pitcher at the moment esp if its for 175 innings.

I dont mind trying to get Pie or Marquis but just moving Pie for Olsen doesnt really excite me unless someone can prove to me Pie has such upside over Olsen. Esp when both the Cubs and Padres seem to think Pie isnt worth the time yet SD think’s Olsen is worth all this effort.

The Cubs wont keep Pie, be patient and get him and keep Olsen as well.

by sanders833 on Nov 30, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ding, ding, ding
The Cubs wont keep Pie, be patient and get him and keep Olsen as well.

We have a winner.

Duck Around - a progressive blog about the Eastern Shore of Maryland. And getting off my lawn.

by duck on Nov 30, 2008 8:41 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

A few quibbles

Jones is a #2 guy and Luke Scott ain’t a cleanup hitter on any decent MLB team.

 Try this:

1) Roberts
2) Jones
3) Markakis
4) Huff
5) Mora
6) Scott
7) Wieters
8) Pie
9) Izturis

That’s a lineup that might win, say, 75 games. Oh, goody.

Get me pitching and get it now! Or, at least, get me a plan to have a decent rotation with 3 seasons.

Duck Around - a progressive blog about the Eastern Shore of Maryland. And getting off my lawn.

by duck on Nov 30, 2008 8:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

pitching plan

Trade Roberts and Daniel Cabrera to the White Sox for Javy Vazquez and Clayton Richard (fits the Sox plan of moving out payroll but still getting players to win in 2009).

Sign AJ Burnett.

Sign one of the cheaper closers on the market. Move Chris Ray to set up and move Sherrill back to situational position. Kam Macklio becomes Chad Bradford and Jim Johnson and Jamie Walker should fill out the ben.

Sign Orlando Hudson for second base. I havent heard a peep about him signing anywhere.
Sign Cesar Izturis or Felipe Lopez for SS.

Rotation is Vazquez, Burnett, Guthrie with Patton, Olsen, Clayton Richard, Burress, Liz, Waters, etc to battle for the other spots. All minor league pitchers still intact.

I would also take a look at Randy Wolf and Juan Cruz at say three for 24 and three for 15.

By 2010 one of Tillman, Matusz or Arrietta should be close meaning the focus should then turn to the offense-especially the corners assuming Huff and Mora were here in 2009.

by sanders833 on Dec 1, 2008 12:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute...

we’re bitching about Roberts not being here in the future ’cause of his age, but Vazquez was on the Shorebirds the year BEFORE Roberts was!

Duck Around - a progressive blog about the Eastern Shore of Maryland. And getting off my lawn.

by duck on Dec 2, 2008 5:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A different approach on the trade

So, reports are talking about Pie as if he’s the centerpiece of a deal, but that doesn’t make sense. It’s clear the guy hasn’t been successful in the majors and either needs a change or scenery or to be discarded, so why is he the centerpiece? My thought, he’s not. MacPhail’s not stupid. He’s not going to trade potential #3 pitcher like Olsen for a player the Cubs want to discard. There has to be more to this and I think I know what it is…shortstop prospects.

I just read Sickles’s prospect report for the Cubs and noticed shortstops listed as #4, 5, 11, and 12. Then, I checked the Baseball Prospectus listing and saw two of the same guys, Hak-Ju Lee and Ryan Flaherty, in the top 10 as Sickles had.

Now, the Cubs system isn’t rated spectacularly right now. Both Sickles and BP suggest the organization’s prospects begin at good with no sure things after Vitters and Samardzija. Is it possible the Cubs would package Pie and one of Hak-Ju Lee, Ryan Flaherty, Starlin Castro, or Junior Lake or Olsen and a fringe prospect? Maybe Tony Thomas instead of the shortstop? I’m just speculating wildly here.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 1, 2008 1:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Seems remote

None of their prospects really seem worth pursuing to me.

I think Olsen’s name keeps coming up because SD wants him more then the O’s want Pie or Greene.

I mean if you want a three team trade I could see Greene, Pie and maybe some payroll from the Cubs going to the Orioles for Olsen as part of a Peavy package. Still if I am the Orioles I can probably get both of those players in Jan for something that doesnt have Olsen in the deal and if I cant I am not broken up about it.

If the O’s are going to be the mediator, lets see if we can get into a Manny situation. We get the players and someone picks up the tab.

So SD can send us Greene, Chi can send us Pie and Marquis and maybe we would send Chi Olsen. The reason I hate this trade is the O’s are taking players those teams dont want for performance and salary issues and we are giving up the gold-a potential major league starter.

I suspect Andy will position himself for a deal that makes sense or pass.

by sanders833 on Dec 1, 2008 11:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Also, this deal goes counter to the current ideology

The Orioles are on a mission to get younger, cheaper, and faster. Trading for Greene and Marquis does not fit. Both have near albatross contracts and are on the wrong side of the age bracket the FO is looking for. It stands to reason that MacPhail is trying to get Pie and one of the Cubs’ or Padres’ prospects in any deal instead of someone with more then two years service time.

Why Manny? This team isn’t ready to compete and won’t be for another season or two. How does signing Manny help with this?

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 1, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He's not advocating getting Manny

Read: If the O’s are going to be the mediator, lets see if we can get into a Manny situation. We get the players and someone picks up the tab.

He’s referring to the three team Pirates/PHN/Dodgers deal where we get the young and cheap players out of the deal and another team is saddled with the bad contract.

"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"

by exitfare on Dec 1, 2008 5:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, I see

This makes a lot more sense then, and I’d agree.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 2, 2008 1:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Olsen is trade bait...

then find a deal to do. The issue isn’t stuff, its testicular fortitude. You can’t figure a guy for a rotation position who can’t make it out of the 5th without self-destructing. In the end, middle relief is all he will ever be good for.

Having said that, I also don’t get the Pie thing.

by fishoutawata on Dec 3, 2008 1:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

From

Baseball Prospectus via MLBtraderumors…
Regarding the Orioles’ possible involvement in a trade that would send Jake Peavy to the Cubs, Perrotto says Baltimore seeks Ronny Cedeno and Felix Pie from Chicago.

I’m guessing it is Olson for those two?

Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark

by BPinOK on Dec 3, 2008 2:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This still doesn't make sense

Why would MacPhail, who hasn’t made a slapdash or “stupid” trade so far, go after two failed prospects for a guy that still has a good chance, especially in the NL?

Felix Pie, fine, he would be all right in left as he could become a good leadoff man if Roberts were traded, but Cedeno makes no sense. In fact, it makes less sense now then it did at the start of last season when he was in a package for Roberts. Cedeno is horrible. He was hot for, what, a month then fell apart?

I don’t see this happening. It’s illogical.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 3, 2008 2:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't

remember for sure but I thought that Cedeno’s numbers weren’t that impressive when first visited. Of course Matt Murton and a couple of arms were involved in that initial discussion last year.

Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark

by BPinOK on Dec 3, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What

about the Vitters kid at 3B for the Cubs? We are going to be in the market for a 3B eventually…assuming MelMo doesn’t play long enough that one of his 37 kids takes over for him.

Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark

by BPinOK on Dec 3, 2008 3:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Vitters

Is worth waaaay more than Olson. It would probably take either Tillman or Arrieta to get him.

by dkdc on Dec 3, 2008 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah

OK. I didn’t know how good he was or was projected to be.

Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark

by BPinOK on Dec 3, 2008 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Pie and Cedeno are failed prospects

So is Olson.

I’d do that trade.

by dkdc on Dec 3, 2008 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But this is the age old question

Who has more value a failed, lefty pitching prospect with the ability to come back a be a back of the rotation guy or two failed position prospects (one with incredible speed and defense but an ungodly OBP and BA, the other bad with the glove and decent with the bat)?

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 3, 2008 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take the failed lefty

Pitching is always more valuable than position prospects. Pie still has some upside but I don’t his bat can play in LF. If we didnt’ have Adam Jones, I would do Olson for Pie in a heartbeat. Cedeno is a replacement level player. Olson could still turn it around. We need pitching. Let’s keep him.

by birdman on Dec 3, 2008 4:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So Phillip Hughes, Clay Buchholz

are failed as well?

It doesnt work that way.

Cedeno is a backup middle infielder or as we seem accustomed to saying on this forum a stopgap (or replacement level player) Pie still may mature, but is out of options on a team that wants to win now. I would love to hand LF to Pie and see what he does. But not for Olsen.

Birdman, I am not sure I follow your logic on Pie since we have Jones. So if we moved Jones to left and put Pie in center you would be ok assuming Jones turns into a 25 homer guy?

Tampa doesnt look so bad with Crawford in left.

by sanders833 on Dec 3, 2008 4:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So Phillip Hughes, Clay Buchholz are failed as well?

Right now, yes, but I would love to have either pitcher. Both will probably turn out to be valuable in the long run.

Birdman, I am not sure I follow your logic on Pie since we have Jones. So if we moved Jones to left and put Pie in center you would be ok assuming Jones turns into a 25 homer guy?

I don’t know… if you move Jones to LF, his value diminishes. He’ll hit like a champ as a CF, as a LF, he’ll be fine, but nothing special. We need above to average players at as many positions as possible. So my logic regading Pie is pretty simple, he’s a CF. If we needed a CF, I would love to have him. His minor league numbers aren’t anything special for a LF. He tore up AAA but after repeating the league. His ML numbers aren’t great. He still has upside though, but I don’t see why his bat could play LF. I guess you could say, Pie has TOOLS! Whatever, I still want a guy who can hit like a LF. I would rather go with Scott and Reimold than give up Olson. who in contrast, has a terrific minor league record. He might just need a bit more seasoning.

by birdman on Dec 3, 2008 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

as i've mentioned before...

olson stunk last year, but he DID improve over the previous year. it’s not inconceivable that he could take a step up towards being a serviceable back end starter this year (as opposed to being the guy who just happens to anchor the lower echelons of the o’s rotation).

THAT being said, i don’t think anyone has ever comapred olson to bucholz and hughes except for that they are all young pitchers in the al east. i believe they are both projected as legit front end guys.

"When people ask me what my motivation is, I have a simple answer: Money."

--Jerry Reed, on acting

by j.q. higgins on Dec 3, 2008 5:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I don’t know why sanders bought up Bucholz or Hughes. Those guys were universally high on everybody’s prospect list. Olson has always been projected to be a back end guy.

by birdman on Dec 3, 2008 5:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I bring them

up to say pitchers can be very inconsistent in their early years and one or two bad years doesnt mean they are failures. I have never compared the three pitchers in terms of ability or upside.

I still wouldnt mind giving Pie 2009 to prove he can be the left fielder if we can get him for a nominal prospect or I would trade Scott for him.

by sanders833 on Dec 3, 2008 6:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, then yes, I agree about that regarding young pitchers.

Which is exactly why I would rather keep Olson over a guy who shown little evidence of actually being able to play LF (at least offensively).

by birdman on Dec 3, 2008 6:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pitching über alles?
Pitching is always more valuable than position prospects.

That’s always been my feeling as well.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 3, 2008 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You always need more pitchers

as they seem to fail more often then positional prospects. Of course, if your the Orioles you have mastered the ability to have positional and pitching prospects fail more often then not as well.

by sanders833 on Dec 3, 2008 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I disagree somewhat

Pitching prospects are less valuable than hitting prospects because they are more likely to blow out their arm or not develop. If you can trade pitching prospects for hitting prospects, that’s generally a good idea.

Of course, Olson, Pie, and Cedeno are all in that nether region between prospects and productive major leaguers, so it’s a little more complex.

I like buying low on Pie, I hate selling low on Olson, and I think Cedeno has enough upside to make the deal worthwhile.

by dkdc on Dec 3, 2008 9:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pitching prospects are less valuable than hitting prospects because they are more likely to blow out their arm or not develop.

Yeah, but I thought this was outweighed by the fact that good pitching is a much rarer commodity than good hitting. But may be you’re right, when the Rays traded Young for Garza, I believe the Twins had to throw in Barlett in order to make the perceived difference between good young hitting versus good young pitching.

by birdman on Dec 3, 2008 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Orioles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Flying-dog_cap_small
More home runs, please

Recent FanPosts

Small
Desert Dogs Championship Thread
Small
Which players have you met?
Small
Reunite the "Why Not?" Orioles on RBI Baseball 2
0207_large_small
Oriole Park Rated #1
Brad-bergesen_away_small
A Long-Term Deal for Dr. Jones?
Small
Project Prospect report on Josh Bell
Small
2010 CHONE projections for BAL Hitters
11405642_small
Trading for a True Ace?
11405642_small
Dan Uggla at 3B/DH

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium