Danys Baez could start next year, but he won't
Baltimore Sun scribe Jeff Zrebiec has some news:
With as many as four openings in their 2009 rotation, the Orioles aren't ruling out any candidates to start, and that includes Danys Baez.
Baez, who hasn't pitched in a major league game since August 2006 and is trying to come back from ligament-reconstruction surgery, has informed team officials he wants to be a starter in the coming season. Signed to a three-year, $19 million deal after the 2006 season to set up closer Chris Ray, Baez hasn't started a game since 2002, when he went 10-11 with a 4.41 ERA in making 26 starts for the Cleveland Indians.
"He's expressed some interest in preparing himself as a starter, and we'll see how things go from there," Orioles president Andy MacPhail said. "It seems to make sense. I don't know if you lose anything by doing that. Preparing yourself that you are going to start is not going to retard your development whatever the role you end up being in."
First of all, I love Andy MacPhail's use of the word "retard" in this situation. That's a man willing to use the language.
But let's talk about Baez as a starter. The most important thing to realize, before we get into condemning or praising the idea, is that this is Danys Baez throwing a hail mary to save his career. He knows there's nothing important for him in the bullpen. Jim Johnson emerged as our #1 right-handed option this year, George Sherrill is an excellent LOOGy, and Chris Ray will be back. Zrebiec mentions the same thing, and I think it's very important to consider that Baez is essentially going last-ditch to be an important member of the club.
The last time saw Baez, he put up a 6.44 ERA in 50 innings in his first year as an Oriole. The signing of Baez was absolutely terrible and completely indicative of the way the O's used to do things in the offseason. They overpaid a guy who was, being kind, league average the year before, because he had nine saves for the Dodgers or because he'd racked up 96 saves from 2003-05 with the Indians and Rays. Nevermind that only 2005 was really anything close to a special year for a bullpen arm (2.86 ERA, but with lame K numbers and iffy walk totals).
The one year he's started in the majors, he was a back-end guy at best, and that was six years ago. He had control and pitch count issues. I remember watching one early-season game he started in Detroit that year, where it was snowing. I remember it because it was snowing, and also because Baez labored about as hard as anyone possibly could have while still getting decent results.
Quick B-R.com check reveals it to be April 5, 2002. Baez threw 108 pitches in 5.1 innings (6 BB, 5 K, 2 H, ER).
It is not fair to judge a guy by one game or one partial starting season (Baez started 26 times in 39 appearances in '02), but there's a reason no one has tried to start him since, and a reason why it's only after a bullpen has started filling out in his injured absence that he wants to take another shot at it. There's also a reason the Orioles are willing to let him, which is that it doesn't much matter.
He won't make the rotation. There's a really good chance he won't make the team, period.
Comments
Instead of signing him
we should have burned the money. It would have been more useful.
"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"
by exitfare on
Nov 7, 2008 3:14 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Braden Looper made the transition?
Nah, I don’t believe he can do it, either.
by pipkin on
Nov 7, 2008 7:33 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, well, why not?
Maybe he comes in after his year off and gives us better than Burres numbers for half a season. No harm in trying, right?
spring breeze / the green field / tempts me to play catch
by elk on
Nov 7, 2008 10:48 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd rather make him closer
I think the better plan would be to make Baez the closer. At least that way he may have some trade value. It was a horrible signing, but that’d be making the best of a bad situation. He should be easier to trade given that he’s actually had success at closer. I think alot of teams were scared of Sherrill’s inexperience.
by edsachs1 on
Nov 7, 2008 12:45 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
he's an awful player
A concern over his potential trade value is totally irrelevant to the conversation. If you can get five bad innings from him instead of one awful inning, you take that option. He’s not good enough to try and slot (force, rather) him into the most potentially trade-valued position he could fill. No team has any excuse to use a guy as bad as him as their closer, either. You’re telling the other 24 guys you don’t give a shit they tried hard for eight innings, because here’s this wild card.
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on
Nov 7, 2008 1:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Minimize his damage
if that’s possible, and if he is truly of no use, Jay Gibbons could use a new roommate on the road next year.
Duck Around - a progressive blob about the Eastern Shore of Maryland. And getting off my lawn.
by duck on
Nov 8, 2008 9:06 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs

















