(Ralph) Nader recounted a recent meeting with editors at The Washington Post, who he said told him the paper wasn’t covering his campaign because he had no chance of winning. According to Nader, he replied: "Then why are you covering the Nationals?"
3 months ago
duck
7 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
tremendous
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on Sep 26, 2008 7:00 PM EDT 0 recs
Nader should have throw in the Orioles.
Zartan says, "Sign Dan Johnson."
by birdman on Sep 26, 2008 7:46 PM EDT 0 recs
of course he has no shot at winning
if they don’t cover him. Not that I’m a Nader fan, but any third party nominee has almost no chance of winning because they don’t get equal publicity… whether they can afford it or not. It’s one of the many things wrong with what the system has evolved into.
Kevbo: [to George Sherrill] George, you look a lot like Vin Diesel...
Flatbill: Let's get somethin' straight... Vin Diesel looks like me.
-From "The Making of Orioles Magic"
by dayzd toe on Sep 27, 2008 1:24 PM EDT 0 recs
Politics in the country is so fucked up
because of the two party system
"This world extends way beyond this little field of dreams we're dancing in and I want to see that world"
by exitfare on
Sep 27, 2008 10:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Perot had a shot in '92
If he hadn’t pulled out in July, I think he could have finished second. He didn’t come back until Oct. 1, and finished with 19% in a race where the winner was at 43%.
"I wasn't here for the losing years. But it feels a little like the days with Earl in charge and John Lowenstein smashing birthday cakes in the middle of the clubhouse with a bat." - John "T-Bone" Shelby
by duck on
Sep 28, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
And that's why I voted for him
way back when
Curt never met a buttered roll he didn't like.
by CoachOfEarl on Sep 29, 2008 12:09 PM EDT 0 recs
New FanPost
