Camden Chat: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Where each team stands right now

Friday Bird Droppings

Gonzalez ready to fight for closing job 
Mike Gonzalez expects to be the Orioles' full-time closer in 2010, but he's taking the same approach he has had his entire career. He's prepared to fight for it. -duck

After flurry, Orioles likely to wait awhile
On Thursday, a team official shot down a report that the Orioles are pursuing St. Louis Cardinals slugger Matt Holliday, who the club believes would be too costly to acquire, and denied that they have made a significant effort to trade for San Diego Padres first baseman Adrian Gonzalez. -duck

Holliday Intrigue: Orioles in, and a "mystery team" arrives
The connections between the Orioles and Holliday go from his friendship with Roberts, to Baltimore’s recent signing of Holliday’s former teammate Garrett Atkins to even, as Zrebiec points out, pitching coach Rick Kranitz past life as an Oklahoma State coach and his ongoing friendship with Holliday’s father, Tom. The real connection driving this story however is this: The Orioles had reason to talk to Holliday’s agent, Scott Boras, in the past few days as they finalized the deal with reliever Mike Gonzalez. -duck

Mets, Angels, Braves, Giants, Mariners still have moves to make - Jon Heyman
More proof that Jon Heyman is not good at his job. Sure, we're biased towards the Orioles, but no mention of the team's moves at all while focusing on the Mets' pursuit of Matt Holliday. Every other media outlet is reporting the O's are in the mix, but to Heyman? We don't exist. And Adam Jones was one of the biggest busts in baseball his rookie year. Don't forget that gem, too. -duck

Look back at Bowie in 2009
Today we continue our look back at O's minor league teams from the 2009 season with a feature on Double-A Bowie of the Eastern League with comments from Baysox manager Brad Komminsk. -duck

O's on Deck: Orioles making all the right gambles
How do the Orioles reverse the slide of 12 consecutive losing seasons? Obviously, the answer isn't simple or the Orioles wouldn't be facing the question. However, the team is doing what it needs to do in order to win in the always competitive American League East. With their moves so far this offseason -- trading for Kevin Millwood and agreeing to deals with Garrett Atkins and Mike Gonzalez -- the Orioles are addressing their weaknesses heading into 2010. -duck

Garrett Atkins and Mike Gonzalez: A closer look
Snapshot looks at each player. -duck

Mets Sign Igarashi, a Reliever, in 2-Year Deal
The Mets agreed Thursday with the Japanese reliever Ryota Igarashi on a two-year, $3 million contract. The Mets want Igarashi to be the eighth-inning setup man for the All-Star closer Francisco Rodriguez. -duck

Trade to Mariners leaves Lee in ‘shock'
Cliff Lee thought he was staying in Philadelphia — for the rest of his career. -duck

Grandma got run over by a Open Thread
Walking home from our house Christmas Eve.
You can say there's no such thing as Santa,
But as for me and Grandpa, we believe.

0 recs  |  Comment 259 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thats how I felt when I signed the papers to my house last year....

Im like…. “Sweet, you mean, Ill have this paid off in 2038!!?!?”

Score.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

and i know it’s not much consolation, but one extra principal payment a year on your mortgage will knock the years from 30 to 22.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

bi-monthly payments (of half the amount due each) also help quite a bit

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I heard that too....

I gotta get back with Wells-Fargo and get that set up.
I might as well pay half on the 15th and the other half on the 1st anyway… the money is sitting there and if it can knock off a couple years that would be sweet.
Its depressing paying like $1600/month mortgage and watching the principle decrease like $204 every month.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

If you have a good interest rate

what’s the advantage of paying it off early? I guess if you’re going to live there forever, but does anybody do that anymore?

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I have a decent

rate and i still pay an extra payment a year. But it’s not like I’m doing w/o to make the payment either. the less i owe the more i can pocket and put into another house when we move.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

But

isn’t that the same as just pocketing the extra payment and putting it into another house when you move? Except you’ve already paid taxes on the extra amount that you are paying them, whereas you’ll have to pay taxes on any gains when you sell the house? No? I find this shit so confusing to think about…

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

but most people spend the money. in theory, if you could stash it and not spend it you’d be fine taking the cash into the next deal. you don’t have to pay takes on the gains if you put it directly into another property.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

that's true

it’s like a self-imposed strict savings device.

You don’t have to pay taxes at all on any gains if you put it directly into another property? That’s pretty awesome. Didn’t know that.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

and

I may not be 100% correct but I think there is around a $200K threshold where you don’t have to pay cap gains on primary residence. So, for me, i could essentially sell my house and keep all of it w/o putting in a property.

again, i’m not 100% sure.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I don’t know nearly enough about this kind of stuff. That sounds pretty attractive though.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

you also don't have to roll into another property anymore

since 1997, as long as you’ve lived in the house 2 of the last 5 years, you can take a $250k deduction ($500k for married filing jointly).

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

it's not the same

by just pocketing it, you’d be losing on the deal. you’d have to actually invest, it at a higher interest rate than your mortgage, to come out ahead.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

true

One would hope that with rates so low right now you could get stock market returns somewhat consistent with historical trends. Not a sure thing though.

Also the tax issue makes a big difference. If you really don’t have to pay taxes on gains from a house then it totally changes the equation.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

see above

however, the new rule expires in 2011….unless they extend it.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

If you have other debt, use the money to pay that down first

I don’t so I’m trying to pay off a 30 year mtg in 20 years. When I took ECON, I setup a spreadsheet that shows what the payments will be. Paying an extra $300/mo on a 250k at 6.5% mortgage means the total payments you make are only $450k, vs $575k with no extra payments. An extra $600/mo pays it off in 15 years, total payments = $400k

You’re basically earning whatever your interest rate is, so even if it’s 4% it’s better than savings, and you won’t lose it like in the stock market. You get equity faster, which gives you more flexibility if you want/need to sell/move. And it eliminates mortgage insurance faster if you don’t have 15-20% equity yet, which is just money down the drain.

by CoachOfEarl on Dec 18, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I did, too

It hurts me quite a lot.

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Dec 18, 2009 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Even worse than the year, 2038,

is the projections on how much you’ll actually have paid for the house with interest factored in. That was the worst document for me to see.

by Roarfrom34 on Dec 18, 2009 9:09 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah.... I closed for 210K

I saw the projection was well over 400. Thats pretty gross.
My dad was the biggest penny-pincher his entire life and lived very frugally.
I remember when he bought out house about 15 years ago and walked in and
paid “cash” for it after 20 years of saving.

I could never do that….. Im too much of a spendthrift.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

same here...

i couldnt even imagine saving enough for a house…it makes my head hurt..lol

by Parkinglotninja on Dec 18, 2009 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

just curious

but what exactly does 210 get you where you are at?

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Im out in Leesburg right now...

Closed about a year ago.
Bought a townhouse in a nice area – 3 bedroom, 2 full bathrooms, 2 half baths, finished basement, 1-car garage, wood floors on the middle level, high ceilings upstairs, double door entry in the master bedroom, small fenced in back yard.

It sold for 365K back in 2006, so Im just hoping to make a little money on it and sell it about 5 years from now. The market value of it has been quite stagnant to this point though.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

cool.

one good thing about being out here in the middle is we bought a 3 bed, two bath, 3 car garage on an just under one acre brand new for 175

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

more middle...oklahoma

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha..

Gotcha. Stuff is insane crazy priced out here.
Leesburg is actually pretty pricey because its about 30 miles from DC but its a quiet more rural type community. I like it though.
The nice thing is, after I bought in they announces they were going to expand the DC Metro out to our area in about 5 years, so I hope that gives it a nice price boost too. We’ll see…. this stuff is so unpredicatable these days.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

no doubt

we’re lucky in that we didn’t have any of the huge price swings others experienced. but we also have to wait a little longer for the appreciation and chance to turn a little profit. i love having the acre though. i’ve never grown anything in my life but my wife and i started a garden last year and we have a bunch of deer around the backyard as the 5 acres around us are still undeveloped.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

my birthplace!

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Leesburg.

Born at Loudon Co Memorial hospital during a weekend when my parents were visiting my grandmother. my grandma lived in this HUGE old plantation-y house on route 7 just outside of town. last time i was in the neighborhood, it was still there.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

HA! My wife works @ that hospital....

Its a great area… too quiet for my taste though. Alot of old farts getting their early bird specials and hitting the sack……errr…. on second though, you would LOVE it!

ZING!

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

zing!

I just checked Google maps, the old house is still there. Hang a sec….

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Google Earth it... that'll really take you back memory lane.

Want me to go take a clump out of their yard and mail it to you….. for nostalgia’s sake?

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

WW, do you recognize this house?

I played here every summer as a boy. Back then, all the land around it was part of the property (no developments). There was a barn behind in where that cul-de-sac is now.

Her house was the one in the upper left of this pic, jsut to the left of the tennis courts.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL

I dont recognize the house by memory but Ive been to Morven park several times and have seen those tennis courts. Small world. How long did you live there?

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

oh, never lived there.

my grandmother did. but for 18 years, we were there 2x – 3x a year. Usually once a summer, and then either TG or Xmas or both.

That house was really a window into another time for me. It had separate servant stairs into the kitchen, it had a back upstairs balcony on one corner, and a huge dining room with a table that could easily seat 14 – 16 people, and had a buzzer on the floor underneath it (which is really old school). It had a study/library on the ground floor with an extra fireplace where menfolk would retire to after dinner. An amazing veranda covered with wisteria on the west end, and a closed-in sunporch/music room on the east end.

It had to have been built in the 20s or thereabouts. It was really like something out of Gatsby.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

wow

thats close to me. i pass morven park all the time

by twistedlogic on Dec 18, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah...

I’m trying to buy in Arlington right now…

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Off Season Progress?

AM had money to spend and a losing team with lots of young prospects but a few “holes” to fill. He traded a relief pitcher for Millwood. The man is a horse and will give the O’s some veteran innings. Good move, I think. Last season’s bullpen sucked wind after Sherrill left. So, he brought in another lefty closer. Cost the team $$ and a #2 draft choice next year. Okay move, and one that will improve the team drastically. Having a dependable closer will make a big difference. Mora is gone and Bell isn’t ready. So he spent some more $$ to hire a guy with a history of hitting for power that had a bad year. Okay. Give the guy a chance to regain his stroke while Bell plays at AAA. Lots of upside to that deal, and only $$ spent. I would say AM has done a great job so far. Steve Johnson was an unfortunate loss, but he may be back.

by fuddnelson on Dec 18, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions  

Now let's deal with 1B.

If Delgado is able to play 1B in winter ball and can still hit, why not? He could hold the fort there til someone younger with power comes along. I don’t think Snyder is the answer. Maybe Waring or Townsend, but not Snyder. Not enough power to play 1B in the AL East. The Orioles need to find a 1B that can help them compete with the Yankees and Red Sox down the road. Snyder, Aubrey, Hughes, Wigginton, etc. ain’t gonna cut it.

by fuddnelson on Dec 18, 2009 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

agreed

i think snyder is just being groomed for trad ebait now…am knows he wont be able to cut it in our division, hes a good hitter but 20 hr a yr just isnt gunna be enough from him

by Parkinglotninja on Dec 18, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Veteran Presence

It’s important that the O’s acquire veterans who can handle an immediate need and positively influence the younger guys. We just aren’t going to get many – if any – true impact players on the market this off-season. However, we can patch holes and add guys like Millwood who will serve an important purpose, namely eating innings and preserving both the bullpen and our younger arms. He’s not going to take us to the post-season, but he can still make important contributions as our talent matures.

Delgado is a good example of a guy who we could acquire with a short-term contract for the purpose of being a placeholder, hopefully adding a little pop to the lineup, and teaching the younger guys what it means to be a big league player. It may sound trite, but I do believe there’s something to the idea of a “culture of losing.” Gotta break the cycle and bring in guys who know how to play the game.

by Roarfrom34 on Dec 18, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

Just wanted to state again that I kinda like this team

I like our players… Guthrie, Jones, Roberts, Markakis, etc. The losing stinks, but it’s definitely a lot easier rooting for this team. I like MacPhail’s all moves so far. If we don’t get Holliday.. shrug.

Beating dead horse… I’m still confused about Halladay/Lee though. Lee sounds pretty upset leaving Philly.

by Y Not on Dec 18, 2009 10:27 AM EST reply actions  

yeah

even though we dont win..i like our players and feel great cheering for them and i feel no shame in being an orioles fan…

by Parkinglotninja on Dec 18, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Philly might still be able to snag him anyway

Who knows? Maybe he’ll forgive them and sign there.

by PhilR8 on Dec 18, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Cliff Lee

The guy says he wants to test out free agency and is then shocked that the team trades him?

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

Hey, if you want to spend the rest of your life in Philly

have your agent contact the team after this season.

Of course, you could get a place near Philly and stay in the AL too, contact A. MacPhail, Baltimore.

by CoachOfEarl on Dec 18, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm wondering

if his agent wasn’t saying things that Lee didn’t tell him to say. If you heard his interviews about it he sounds honestly devastated.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

On the very shallow end of things

Brian looks hot in that pic

Even atheists believe in Matt Wieters

by wickedwitch on Dec 18, 2009 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Still confused also

The Lee/Halliday trade is just one of the many things that confuse me. I thought that the reason for the deal was Lee’s reluctance to sign a long term deal with Phillie. Hence the trade that netted Phillie Halliday and landed Lee in Seattle as a one year rental. Lee has now said that he wanted to stay. So, what gives.

Also, I like the Orioles 3 moves. We acquired two useful players and one rehab project (Atkins) who might pan out. All we lost was Ray and a second round pick. Given the fact that even first round picks succeed less than half of the time (the vast majority of the Orioles first round picks for the last 15 years have cratered), the loss is not too great. Also, we only committed ourselves for one year with Atkins and Milwood, and only 2 for Gonzales. So, we have not tied up our money for years to come. The 3 new players will make us a better team that will win maybe 75-80 games next year. That is progress.

by BaltoBen on Dec 18, 2009 10:58 AM EST reply actions  

HAHAHA

Dude… the popcorn line made me seriously laugh out loud.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

doesnt exist..

i once got thrown out of enviromental svcience class for my arguement of it doesnt exist…we argued for at least 20 mins (me and my teacher, until she started to back peddle and changed the terms in discussion from global warming to climate change. i called her out and she threw me out of class for the day… i win

by Parkinglotninja on Dec 18, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not getting into one of these fights

but i’ve always been curious… if there is even a question of it existing or not, why fight it? So we live a bit “greener” and at the very least we get a life with less polution. Maybe “global warming” won’t kill us all within the next 6 days or whatever, but why wouldn’t you want to live in a cleaner world that had less dependence on fossil fuels?

by daveh873 on Dec 18, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

It's not the lack of helmets that's the problem

Many fixed-gear bicycles don’t have brakes. And that’s by choice of the rider. It boggles the mind.

by PhilR8 on Dec 18, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

So when my bike gets stolen

can I whip out my iphone and program it to come back? That would be awesome.

by CoachOfEarl on Dec 18, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

use their legs

Fixed-gear meaning that you can’t “coast” – every turn of the rear wheel is a turn of the crank. Turn the crank and the rear wheel spins; slow the crank and the wheel slows.

by PhilR8 on Dec 18, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm

Interesting. People like those? I don’t think I’ve ever seen one.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

there's a girl I know who swears by them as a fitness tool

And she has a very nice body, so I’ll take her word for it. She always tells people to buy one.

The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST

by the fix is in on Dec 18, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Most (if not all?) couriers use them

Its amazing the kind of control you can get with a fixed gear bike once you learn what you’re doing. Its the stupid hipsters who just ride them becasuse they think theyre cool that give them a bad name.

by kba26 on Dec 18, 2009 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

it's a hipster sort of thing

spend some time on Mt. Royal ave. and you’ll see tons.

by Steve. on Dec 18, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

They're EVERYWHERE

I"m wearing flannel today, I think I might be one?
:/

by Steve. on Dec 18, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

stupid little fedora?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

no!

I’m safe for now.

although I really lack “art school cred.” My friends called me ‘baseball cap’ because I was the only one at school wearing an actual non-ironic hat.

by Steve. on Dec 18, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

if my great-great-great-great-great grandchildren aren't smart enough to fix it..

then they have no right to enjoy a clean planet.

However, if they are smart enough to fix it…

Then if my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great^15th grandchildren aren’t smart enough to solve the problem of exhausted nuclear fuel in the sun causing expansion and possible consumption of our planet.. then they don’t deserve to live in it…

However, if they are smart enough to fix it….

Then if my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great^50th grandchildren aren’t smart enough to solve the laws of increasing entropy causing the inevitable dissolution of all matter as we know it.. then they don’t deserve to live in it…

However..

by Y Not on Dec 18, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

42.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow.

That was awesome. Thank you

by Y Not on Dec 18, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Im stealing a line out of Os21fan's book

“Im not really sure what you’re trying to say here….”

lol. Sounded cool though…

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Im stealing a line out of Os21fan’s book

Oh, I thought you were going to call him an asshole.

I kid…

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

you guys don't know what you're talking about.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Dec 18, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

YESSSSS

Os21Fan and BIRDMAN show up inexplicably at the same time…

Cue the music “DUN, DUN, DUUUUUUUN”

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

let's get ready to rumble!

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Dec 18, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

lol!

"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Churchill,1942-- a rebuilding year.

by Titov on Dec 18, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

If you truely believe it’s fiction, then money and convienence. Lots and lots of money.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Was in response to

if there is even a question of it existing or not, why fight it? So we live a bit "greener" and at the very least we get a life with less polution.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Gotcha... I was kinda kidding.

Im sitting a few plays out today after festering everything up the past couple days. But I still like to watch (that sounded bad). lol

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess

but there are plenty of little things that people can do that just make sense without costing them tons of money or being terribly inconvienient. I’m not saying everyone should go out and buy solar panels for their home.

by daveh873 on Dec 18, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, definitely

there are som many incentives to “go green” in so many different ways, and if that suits you, great. If you completely don’t believe in global warming though, why not do a few small things just in case? Like I said, even if it isnt real, less pollution isnt really a negitive end to your actions is it? Things like taking shorter showers, using more energy efficient light bulbs, making sure to turn off lights when leaving a room, carpooling or walking sometimes, and taking MPG into consideration when buying a car dont really cost much if anything and really arent much of an hassle. Ive just never understood people that are so against the idea of there being global warming that they cant see beyongd the argument to the greater positive that could come from it.

by daveh873 on Dec 18, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

It all makes sense once you frame the argument using money.

Creating incentives and educating the public about those incentives, as well as potential savings of being sustainable – this is how you influence public opinion. I’m glad that this is the current tactic.

by PhilR8 on Dec 18, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

But creating those incentives costs money and that money has to come from somewhere. Right now, our “greenness” already costs us more money than it saves us, being even greener costs even more money.

If the enviornment is in dire straights as many suggest, then we should easilly accept those costs; if it’s not, then there is valid reason not to.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Well of course

It’s an up-front cost but a long term investment. If we can create a successful green economic sector the costs will be paid back ten fold with corporate tax revenues, job creation, exports, etc. And that doesn’t even take into account the potential national (and societal really when you consider where oil money goes often times) savings if what we produce can eliminate or decrease our purchases of foreign oil.

Really even if you don’t believe in global warming (which I personally just can’t understand, but whatever), the economic and national security arguments for creating a green economy are pretty convincing, at least to me. But you’re right, like any industry that involves R&D there is significant up-front cost.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure how it can pay off economically long term

If as a country, we’re buying a product for something for $1 today and tommorrow that same exact product for $2, somehow/somewhere we are going to have less money; which would be the case if you think that GW is fake.

If you think it’s fact, then if we do the research now, then we can get a lead and be dominant in the market in the future.

I do agree that either way, being less dependent on foreign oil provides other benefits, but obviously right now, economically we’re better off buying foreign oil (although it would be nice to know how much that oil is really costing us when you factor in how much it costs to defend it).

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

What do you mean about buying a product for $1 today and $2 tomorrow?

Is it really any different than computers? The government made massive investments in the development of computer technology (mostly for military purposes), but there’s no question at all that it’s paid off. Sure green technology isn’t as likely to be as economically successful as computers, but who knows – if we’re around long enough to actually run out of oil and the developing world continues developing and needing more energy it could be even more successful. It just seems like any investment that a society makes in it’s future – sure there’s some risk, but the upside potential is gigantic and if you believe in GW then the risk of not doing it is equally daunting.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The difference

The difference between computers and green technology is that computers ended up being a valuable product.

The point of this thread was if you were one of those people that thought that GW is fake, why not do it anyway. If you really think it’s fake (which seems silly), then Green Tech is not a valuable product in the future.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Right

but it took 75 years of development and lots of investment for computers to be a valuable product. If oil is not going to be here forever, won’t alternative energy sources be incredibly valuable? Oil is still around and plenty of companies are making money off of green tech – imagine when oil isn’t or is absurdly expensive.

I guess if you think GW is fake then the only reason to do it is to stop buying foreign oil and hope to create a thriving clean energy economy here.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

what a great comment

I’ve never actually thought about it like that. Brilliant.

by PhilR8 on Dec 18, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

there’s almost nothing there.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

You been drillin’ up there lately eh?

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

No

Just reading about it.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Oil is probably the least of the problems

It’s electricity that is really the issue right now with regards to the enviornment.

 And what you’re talking about isn’t the value in going green, it’s the value of finding alternatives to foreign oil; which I think is important as well.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

A good amount of all the things I mention below (or above – can’t tell anymore) are related to electricity efficiency.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

And are

about going green. But who cares if it creates jobs and revenue for companies?

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I was responding to your post about oil being a limited commodity, which isn’t a “green” argument. Saying that we should use less oil because one day it’ll all be gone is different than saying that we should use less because the enviornment is changing.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

But it's an argument

for spending money on R&D – so that we can fill the global need for an energy source.

I’m saying that even if GW isn’t in the picture there are reasons to “go green” regardless of the motivation.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

But there is also motivation not to.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

In a perfect world we would have plenty of money to spend on current needs and future investments. It’s the juggling where it’s gets tricky and people start to lose their heads.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats almost the exact same argument you made...

….. about running the debt through the sky these four years. I think our spending has spiraled beyond the point of out of control. At some point you gotta say, we gotta get this thing under control or our children and their children may live in the US of China…

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a similar argument

that investing in things that make your society better is better for the long term health of said society than cutting spending to cut spending.

You’re right though. It’s just a different philosophy. Lots of economists share your view that the deficit is really bad. But lots of economists agree with me that spending less would be much worse for the future generations.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I think spending less would be worse in the short-term

I dont see how racking up trillions and trillions more in loans out of China is helping us ‘long-term’. Heaven forbid we ever have to go to war with them. (Go ahead, insert Iraq/Afghanistan comments here).

PS. Recently you mentioned our “two pointless” wars draining tons of money. Didnt your guy just approved a huge surge to send 30,000+ more troops over?

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

So you agree that spending less would be worse in the short-term?

I agree with that – spending less is a bad idea in a recession. And the way that it would help us in the long run is if we use the money to address long term costs (infrastructure, energy, health care, etc).

As for “my guy” sending more troops – I was very opposed to the Iraq war – that was the only one I said was pointless. But regardless, even in that one I don’t advocate just leaving. The incredible mistake was going there int he first place (“your guy”), but now that we’re there we have to be responsible about it.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Meh.... We probably aren't far off opinion-wise

on some of the war stuff. The spending stuff we’re miles apart. Im definitely not a proponant at all in government run healthcare but I think there needs to be way more oversight into the insurance companies running amuck. Call me heartless and calloused, but I grew up without much at all and my Dad was cheap and didnt make hardly any money and didnt have money to send me to college (or wouldnt) so I had to make my own way from scratch. Im not saying everyone should join the military but I think everyone should take up some personal responsibility in their outcomes and oftentimes people screw it up and then look for a bailout. Im just not down with that. I know there are legitimate cases where we as a society need to step in and look out for the welfare of the less fortunate but I really think most of the ‘social’ type money is junk. Creating jobs… Im all about it of course. Buuuuuut anyway…

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m not a proponent of government run health care either. Hopefully I didn’t say I was. Definitely agree on the insurance oversight.

I don’t think that’s necessarily a heartless view either about personal responsibility. I sort of feel like some people in our society don’t really have the tools to be successful about personal responsibility though.

I don’t think you’re opinion is WRONG just so you know.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

so you think we should get rid of medicare?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

No

I assumed he meant universal healthcare/effectively ending the private insurance industry when he said “government run healthcare.”

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats what I meant.

Two different animals. I dont like the government running big stuff in general. Im pretty sure Im not going to see a fucking dime of the money I pay every month into Social Security.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

They do an OK job running the military I assume?

but yeah I doubt I’ll see much in the way of social security either. My fiance’s dad (who I consider pretty smart – PHD in econ) was trying to explain to me that we would (and he’s a Rep), but it went over my head. I don’t see how it’s possible.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Just curious

What about children? It’s not their lack of personal responsibility that caused them to not have health insurance.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

First off..... Im pretty sure there arent many kids

That break their arm that get refused treatment. My wife works at the hospital in Loudon and said people get seen ALL THE TIME without insurance, and that its a law that they have to? Not sure how the reimbursement works…

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

but emergency room care...

….is far less efficient and far more costly that regular care. particularly when a non-emergency case is at stake.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure they get treatment for emergencies

but they don’t get checkups, they don’t get flu shots, they don’t go to the dentist, they don’t get regular medical maintenance that the rest of us get. All of that leads to much worse things down the road (heart disease, diabetes, etc).

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Umm....

Kids get flu shots free at school. At least the ones around here do.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

That's nice

But sometimes people require more than a flu shot.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

not everywhere. And that’s one of the things I mentioned.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

Which, by the way, is one of the reasons I’m for public health care (we already have a bad version of it).

But they probably won’t get diagnosed if they have a pain in their arm that turns out to be cancerous.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

except that if we do it right it could MAKE us lots and lots of money. But instead we’re watching our biggest creditor pull ahead in the development of clean energy…

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

China?

I thought they were our largest foreign creditor; and when I think of clean energy, they aren’t the first that come to my mind; but I could be off on both points.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes China.

I just saw an article (maybe Wall St. Journal) that said that China was pulling far ahead of us in the development of clean tech.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I saw one where they were expected to open something like 1 new coal plant every week over the next 10 years.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, just looked it up

Not 1 coal plant a week, but 2 coal plants a week:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/02/chinas-2030-co2/

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

What does that

have to do with also pulling ahead of us in green tech? I never said they were decreasing their carbon footprint or being more environmentally friendly. Just that they are moving much more rapidly towards having financially rewarding clean energy production.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, sure

They’re is money right now to be made in selling green technology and likely will be more money in the future. But there isn’t actual money in going green, it’s a net loss; which was kind of the point of this branch of the thread.

Like I said, if we need it, we need it and the money shouldn’t stop us; but there is a reason why we shouldn’t go green if you’re a non-believer.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

but what’s the difference between making money producing green tech and making money going green? If it’s our society that’s producing the technology and it’s our society going green, isn’t it a win/win?

Maybe I’m not understanding what you mean by going green? To me when I hear going green I think of having better windows, more efficient heating/air conditioning, better insulation, painting roofs/roads lighter colors, more efficient water movement, driving more efficient cars, etc. All of that stuff involves economic production/profit. Are you talking about like walking to work instead of driving or taking the subway? I guess that’s an economic loss.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

but what’s the difference between making money producing green tech and making money going green? If it’s our society that’s producing the technology and it’s our society going green, isn’t it a win/win?

If you think there is no value in going green, then it would be a win/lose scenario. Producers would win, consumers would lose because they are paying much more for something they don’t need.

By going green, I mean actually taking action to stop global warming. Changing how we generate most of our electricity, not buring gas in our cars, dramatically changing how much carbon we release. If GW is real and dire, then small changes aren’t going to do it; we need to change everything. A CF light bulb is nice, but we will need much, much more and very quickly.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

but

if the producers are US companies employing US workers to create products that US consumers want to buy, then who is the loser?

That’s thepart I’m not following. Right now we are giving a huge chunk of our energy money to companies in other countries and generating tax revenue for them. Wouldn’t it be better if that money was being spent on US companies to support US employment and tax revenues?

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Because those resources are going into something that provides no value, rather than something that has value.

Think about in on the very small scale, if you create a very small society of 10 completely isolated people; do you want 2 of them working on something that is worthless to that society, or would you rather have them doing something valuable?

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

What resources are going into something that provides no value? Do you mean diverting money away from oil and into clean tech R&D? Obviously we have to keep buying oil, but if you only buy things that have immediate value how would you ever develop any new technologies? Your society and economy would never grow – that’s the point of investment.

As far as your example – if you want the society to grow somebody would HAVE to be working on things that have potential value rather than current value. That’s how societies progress and evolve.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

But if global warming is bogus

Then there is no future value to releasing less carbon.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

But even if GW is bogus

aren’t we going to run out of oil regardless? We’re still going to need alternative energy sources – whether they be green or not.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

But that’s different than going green. Coal plants are where the vast majority is released (I believe). You can get rid of gas cars and still not be green. We can change from oil powered cars to coal powered if we really wanted to. That wouldn’t be going green, but it would solve the oil issue.

Of course, eventually you run out of coal too; but that’s something like 250 years based on just the coal deposits known of today in the US.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess that's true.

But even you don’t believe in GW wouldn’t you prefer to avoid destroying the environment? Coal plants are pretty nasty beasts even if you ignore their carbon impact.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I would

But it costs a lot of money and at some point that expenditure will affect us. There is an economic motivation not to pollute less, that’s why we still pollute as much as we do. That’s really the only argument I’ve been making.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah the way it is currently

that’s certainly true. We could easily create some economic incentives to pollute less…but maybe that’s the socialist in me talking…

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

The whole coal thing

makes the saddest. It’s just plain awful.

by Steve. on Dec 18, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

isnt' that the same thing?

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I am so staying out of politics today

Stacey’s mad enough at me.

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

Come on MOM….. LET DAD TALK!!!

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

i skimmed but it’s friday and i’d rather talk something that requires little to no actual thought

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this board is evolving....

We’ve covered Clean Technology…. drilling in ANWAR…. Mortgage strategies…. Economic results of social programs…… GOSH…. opening day PLEASE get here.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I know y'all are joking

And I appreciate all the friendliness in here today, but I’m going to preemptively say that this should not become a topic here the way other things have in the past few days. I will not be able to deal with it.

by Stacey on Dec 18, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

So the mariners want to trade brandon morrow now for a corner infielder OR DH type. any ideas? hmm…

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

LUUUUUKE

Although Safeco might kill him.

by Stacey on Dec 18, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Eggggcactly!

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

IF I AM CORRECT

isn’t morrow always injured?

by chuckthefan on Dec 18, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

we could transplant him into our bullpen. ok…that was bad.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, yes it was

but it was also funny.

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

no school today?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Um, yeah, that's it....

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

are you mobile commenting?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Um, yeah, that's it....

ignore the lack of “via moble” on the bottom of this…

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

well, i'm confused.

are you taking a “mental health day”?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

My students haven't noticed yet....

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Man I'm so glad my 2 pm call got cancelled

I was supposed to have this massive spreadsheet done for it, but instead I’ve been discussing global warming. Much more enjoyable than the stupid spreadsheet.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 1:52 PM EST reply actions  

Off topic

Arriving today in the zknower household:

So I can actually keep up with CC threads in the coming year. Woo-hoo!

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

xmas coming early

or a very swank last-day-of-Hanukah gift.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that a ::gulp:: MAC?!!

I HAAAAAATE Macs… But all my friends swear by em so maybe Im the outcast.

Regardless, CONGRATS!

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, YEAH, it's a mac, baby

i have only ever owned macs. going on 17 years now.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Same here,

and 17 years ago I was five.

Congrats, my sister has a new one and it’s lovely. Mine is going on two years old and it really works like new.

by Steve. on Dec 18, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

the new one is replacing the PowerbookG4 I'm typing this on....

…which is 5 years old. And replaced the original Powerbook (black rubber) before it, which was also five eyars old.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I love how we can be having an amiable chat down here

and an intense semi-disagreeable one up top at the same time.

Seriously, its hilarious. Im all like SCREW YOU, YOU’RE WRONG up top… tap Z…. get sent down here and Im like “CONGRATS on the new CPU brother!!”

HAHA

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I love my mac

But I’ve already filled my hard drive and while it runs well it doesn’t run like new (3 years old). One of these days I’ve got to clean it up.

by Gorilla Bird on Dec 18, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

i wised up for once and got the expanded hard drive our of the gate

disk space is relatively cheap. i’m also going to partition it, which i’ve never done before.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Dad brought home a Performa when I was 12

First computer we ever had and I ever had the joy of playing on.

LOL – Thinking about going back to that thing makes me want to shoot myself in the face.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

our first family computer...

…was the Apple II in 1979 or thereabouts. No disk drives. YOu had to play a tape recorder into it to load programs….

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

TRS-80 FTW

and saving programs your wrote in BASIC on cassette tape. Good times….

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

We had the TI-99

The saving programs on tapes was great, especially when you tried to record it over your brother’s KISS tape.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too

Whenever I play around on friends’ macs I can’t work the things.

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I really cant stand them....

Im so comfortable in Windows. I cant even do VISTA…. eff VISTA.
XP baby… I wish it never changed. Hopefully Windows 7 is decent.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

my fiance has vista and i can barely check my email on her computer. I’m just lost. Although, I was also completely lost upgrading to Office 2007. I’m just not that computer literate…

by O'sFan21 on Dec 18, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Im pretty good with the computer...

…. but yeah Office 2007/Vista/Macs…. ughhh… eff em.
Give me a Dell and XP for life and Ill be pumped.

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Milton Bradley's a Mariner

I wonder why Seattle thinks they can make it work with Bradley when its gone wrong in so many other places.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Dec 18, 2009 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

WOW

dumb move, Seattle.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

they should probably go ahead and donate morrow to us...

ok…that was the last bad joke.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a cost neutral move

Since they are offloading Carlos Silva for him.

I think the Mariners made a smart move here. They get Bradley, who has tons of upside, for Silva, who has none. If Bradley causes shit, just cut him like they likely would have done Silva anyway. If Bradley pans out, you get a .900 OPS in left field/DH.

by James F on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

although i cant stand milton bradley. fun board games tho

by twistedlogic on Dec 18, 2009 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I wonder why Seattle thinks they can make it work with Bradley when its gone wrong in so many other places.

Silva was a sunk cost. Two years running of sucky performance. Bradley can still contribute. If he goes nuts, which is likely, they’ll just cut him.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Dec 18, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

btw, dude

I went to Fashion Island the other night. That shit freaked me out. Newport Beach is like an alien planet.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

cougar land!

Went to the Newport Food Festival in Sept. Cougar land with lots of plastic surgery.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Dec 18, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, i've never seen so much fake in my life.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Gotta roll fellas

Have a great day all. I think I got at least 1 college credit today. We are evolving boys…

by Wieters Wieners on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions  

another bird dropping

BA released their rankings of top Oriole prospects.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 PM EST reply actions  

I love how

Brandon Waring is our top power hitter, but he’s not a top-10 prospect (sigh).

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Nothing surprising there at all

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Dec 18, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting reminder....

TOP DRAFT PICKS
OF THE DECADE
Year Player, Position 2009
2000 Beau Hale, rhp Out of baseball
2001 Chris Smith, lhp Out of baseball
2002 Adam Loewen, lhp Blue Jays
2003 Nick Markakis, of Orioles
2004 *Wade Townsend, rhp Rays
2005 Brandon Snyder, c Orioles
2006 Billy Rowell, 3b Orioles
2007 Matt Wieters, c Orioles
2008 Brian Matusz, lhp Orioles
2009 Matt Hobgood, lhp Orioles

It’s arguable that the O’s missed on 5 out of 10 1st round picks over the last 10 years, and unless Hobgood produces, you can probably make that 6 out of 10.
 

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

no reason to rip on Hobgood yet

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Dec 18, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

isn't that the normal

percentage of 1st rounders that stick though? 50%?

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

But we’ve had early first rounders. And really, we aren’t at 50%, Snyder, Wieters, Matusz, and Hobgood haven’t worked out just yet. Probably only makes sense to look at 2000-2004, where we are only at 20%.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Or we could just look

at 2000 and 2001 and be at 0%.

And just b/c Pie hit for the cycle once doesn’t mean he’s going to reach 3000 hits in his career.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Just saying

You can’t count guys as success in your ratio until they are actually succesful at the ML level.

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just dealing

with what was presented. Not picking and choosing specific bits of info to make the data fit my argument.

I also don’t think you can count them as a bust until they actually bust. I’d consider Wieters a success at this point but the other’s are premature.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t count them as busts (hence the 20% as opposed to 10%), just not counting them at all because we really don’t know. Wieters has been great so far and I’d be surprised if he didn’t work out, but after less than a year, he hasn’t worked out. Snyder hasn’t had a ML PA yet, he’s not a sucess (nor a bust). Hobgood has thrown a pitch above rookie ball yet, how do you count him as a success??? Matusz has pitched less than 50 IP at the ML level, that’s no guarantee yet. Looks good, but you don’t judge a draft pick 1.5 years after he’s drafted

"Hey Yankees... you can take your apology and your trophy and shove 'em straight up your ass!" --Tanner Boyle

by BirdFanInPhilly on Dec 18, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think these Open Threads are a good thing

We’re going to make sense of the crazy world that we inhabit before baseball starts again, and then we’ll watch baseball and talk about what is going on. And more crazy things will happen in the world, but we will not notice or care because we’ll be too absorbed into our baseball world.

Next winter, we’ll make sense of it all.

The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST

by the fix is in on Dec 18, 2009 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

SNOW! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Dec 18, 2009 4:54 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Heyman and Jones

I remember Heyman’s slam on Jones on his “no-star” team story. At least he said Jones was “learning on the job”. He did have a bit of a slow start when thrown into the deep-end last year, but based on subsequent evidence, he seems to have learned pretty damn fast!

"Killing a Yankee fan -- is that illegal in this state?" -- Homicide Life on the Street

by BirdFanLA on Dec 18, 2009 4:55 PM EST reply actions  

So I tried buying a pistol last week and the govment still has me on a hold. i thought 5 days was the max? The guy basically told me that they can make me wait as long as they want. What a crock. I mean, I appreciate the waiting period but look…it’s been a week already. I’m not planning on shooting anyone out of rage. And I don’t even remember if I was pissed at someone a week ago. Just let me have the damn gun. C’mon Luuuke…a little help here?

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 5:34 PM EST reply actions  

no youtube at work

so i’ll take your word for it.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

"Five days?? But I'm mad nowwww!"

It’s from the Simpsons ep where Homer buys a gun.

by O Nina on Dec 18, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as we're doing funny salesman scenes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz7Sk8mhQ7k

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Dec 18, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

just this small .22 revolver. they were on sale really cheap so i thought I’d buy one. maybe not though.

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 18, 2009 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

You need to call back to the dealer

We see that in MD all the time – dealers get backed up on sending in requests and blame the gov when they actually screwed up submitting the paperwork. I’d inquire with the dealer first.

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought

Grandma got run over by an open thread.

"He's a gazelle." -Adam Jones on Nolan Reimold.

by LenaO on Dec 18, 2009 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

245 comments in

and somebody finally notices the typo. Thanks, fixed now.

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha.

I was surprised no one noticed it! I did a quick search of the page and no one had noticed it so I figured I’d mention it. ;D

"He's a gazelle." -Adam Jones on Nolan Reimold.

by LenaO on Dec 18, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

oh it was noticed.

i just didn’t feel like going for the low-hanging fruit.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 18, 2009 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Well why didn't YOU fix it, Mr. Mod??????

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 18, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

that's a fair question.

i think was just too lazy., it’s the offseason, for chrissakes.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 19, 2009 3:02 AM EST up reply actions  

These are the facts

@THE_ADAM_JONES “I would like Adrian Gonzalez on my team cause he could bring the BEST MEXICAN FOOD IN THE WORLD to bmore”

Adam Jones wants mexican food AND Adrian Gonzalez.
He has spoken.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 18, 2009 8:57 PM EST reply actions  

I want Mexican food

I mean, I’ll take Gonzalez, too, if the Padres want say, Lou Montanez, Ty Wigginton, and Chris Waters for him, I like that much better than the trades proposed on other boards.

"I'd like to do something. We all would here," he added. "As I've said before, you just don't want to do anything stupid that you're thinking in May, 'What in the God's green earth was I thinking about?'" - Andy MacPhail 12/8/09

by getxstoked on Dec 18, 2009 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you adam jones

please note that the best mexican food in the world will be in baltimore and you’ll be on your way with chris tillman and friends to san diego.

by twistedlogic on Dec 18, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

just because retards at OH believe it will happen does not mean it will.

actually, it usually means it’s entirely untrue.

see: Brian Roberts, Mark Teixiera, any number of half-baked trade ideas, “the wow offer”, etc, etc, etc.

"I'd like to do something. We all would here," he added. "As I've said before, you just don't want to do anything stupid that you're thinking in May, 'What in the God's green earth was I thinking about?'" - Andy MacPhail 12/8/09

by getxstoked on Dec 18, 2009 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

well yea

but i thought it was ironic that he’d say that even though its likely he’d be discussed in any trade we’d make for gonzalez.

by twistedlogic on Dec 18, 2009 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

on the plus side

the best mexican food in the world (outside of, um, MEXICO) would also be in san diego. or somewhere on the west coast, at least. it sure as hell won’t be in baltimore, no matter who we trade for.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Dec 19, 2009 3:03 AM EST up reply actions  

south texas

is pretty good. but a lot of it is tex-mex. i love some juevos rancheros in the morning!

Don't let the sunshine fool ya. - Townes Van Zandt

by BPinOK on Dec 19, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Or Cincinnati

Ron White’s thoughts on the subject are

LEGEN……

wait for it……

DARY!

"(Brock Lesnar) is never in good spirits and he's not in good spirits now." - Dana White

by duck on Dec 19, 2009 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Orioles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Youppi_small
Tejada
Youppi_small
Effectively Wild
Youppi_small
Why the Orioles Lose: Part XXV

Recent FanPosts

Eric_davis_small
Tejada traded to Padres
Shhh_small
Per ESPN: The Buck Stops Here, er, Tuesday...
Small
It's time for Kranitz and Crowley to go!
Baltimore-skyline_small
Loyal to the game
Youppi_small
OT: Inception (with Spoiler Discussion)
Small
WINTER ALL YEAR LONG?
Images_small
Things We Can Look Forward to in the Second Half

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Official Sponsor of Camden Chat GameThreads

Tankeray_medium
Tankeray provided by dayzd toe

SBNation.com Recent Stories

HOUSTON - JULY 24:  Pitcher Roy Oswalt #44 of the Houston Astros throws against the Cincinnati Reds in the first inning at Minute Maid Park on July 24 2010 in Houston Texas.  (Photo by Bob Levey/Getty Images) +13 updates

Done Deal: Roy Oswalt Traded To Phillies, Will Make Debut Friday Night In Washington

Washington Nationals' third base coach Pat Listach shakes Adam Dunn's hand who rounds third after hitting a solo home run during the eighth inning of a baseball game against the Atlanta Braves, Thursday, July 29, 2010, in Washington. (AP Photo/Drew Angerer)

MLB Trade Deadline: Where Does Your Team Stand As Saturday Approaches?

San Diego Padres' Yorvit Torrealba follows through on an RBI-double during the fourth inning of a baseball game against the Los Angeles Dodgers, Thursday, July 29, 2010, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy) +1 updates

Salazar's 9th Inning Pinch-Hit Single Propels Padres To 3-2 Win Over Dodgers

More from SBNation.com >

SPONSOR

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium


Head Honchos

Oriole1_small zknower

Felix1_small Stacey

Ocsignnew_small duck

Writers

Esskay_small Eat More Esskay

4840750964_54cdc24eef_small James F

Img_1591_small WestcoastO'sFan

2009_june22_philliekid3_small twistedlogic

More Writers

Hagyx_small Roarfrom34