Get Wubbed: 2009 Trade Candidates
2010 Free Agents:
Aubrey Huff
Melvin Mora (club option that I can't see being picked up)
Danys Baez
Jamie Walker
Ryan Freel
Mark Hendrickson
Gregg Zaun (mutual option, but Wieters...)
Adam Eaton
Chad Moeller
Arbitration Eligibile:
Luke Scott
Chris Ray (I believe)
Jeremy Guthrie
Dennis Sarfarte (I believe)
2010 Line-Up w/o Free Agents:
C- Matt Wieters (I only put him here since we all know he WILL be here)
1B-
2B- Brian Roberts
SS- Cesar Izturis
3B-
LF- Felix Pie
CF- Adam Jones
RF- Nick Markakis
DH- Luke Scott
BN- Ty Wigginton
OF-
IF-
C-
2010 Rotation:
Jeremy Guthrie
Koji Uehara
---
---
---
2010 Bullpen:
CL- Chris Ray
SU- George Sherrill
SU- Jim Johnson
MR- Dennis Sarfarte
MR- Matt Albers
MR-
MR-
After compiling this data, what does it tell us? First, it means we have some holes to fill, and we can do it in-house or through free agency. I would like to take a series of posts to talk about the in-house candidates that would fill these holes if no one is traded for or if no one is signed via free agency. I will list them and talk about why they are my choice for in-house candidates in the next couple of blog posts.
This blog post is dedicated to the people listed at the top. I was going to break up why these people will get re-signed, traded or released, but I decided to group them all together. I will start with the ones who could return, and I believe will be returning to 2010.
Re-Signed:
Jeremy Guthrie - He will put up another season of quality numbers as our ace. Do not judge him by his WBC stats or his spring training numbers. He has not lost anything, and he is just getting the kinks worked out. He'll be fine for the Yanks opening day.
Dennis Sarfarte - They will come to some sort of agreement for a 1 year contract. Dennis has to have a solid season as a reliever and prove himself as a late game option or a solid middle option. His multi-year deal will come 1-2 years from now after he proves himself reliable.
Chris Ray - Do I really need to say why? After he puts up great numbers this year, they should nail down a long term deal to nail down our closer for the next 3-5 years buying out his arbitration years.
Arbitration Eligible Who Will Be Traded:
Luke Scott - Low average, decent power, and inability to hit lefties means he has to be platooned no matter where he plays. Too many players are in our system that would do better in his position than he would (Nolan Reimold, Lou Montanez, Scott Moore). The Orioles have the in-house options right now to replace him with people who can play the field a lot better. I anticipate him being traded at the deadline this year if he is putting up good numbers or shopped after the season.
Free Agents to Be and Why They Will Not Be Back With the Team:
Aubrey Huff - He won't be back because he will be traded at the deadline. Huff represents a hot commodity that will be traded, a la Mark Teixeira, at the July trade deadline. As long as Huff is putting up last year's numbers, he will bring back a nice little package. It won't be Tex worthy, but it will help bring some more prospects in. Orioles will not bring him back because they won't want him for multiple years.
Melvin Mora - This team has been trying to get rid of him for a year or two, but his no trade clause has been binding. There will be a need at the deadline, and he will have to decide if he wants to get a ring or if he wants to retire. The Orioles will not bring him back at the end of the year if he is still here. He does not fit in with the plans.
Everyone Else - All of these guys are place holders. Ryan Freel may get a look next year as a super utility, but there are several players who will need the spot over him (Justin Turner, Reimold, Montanez, Moore, Brandon Snyder). If we get anything for these guys at the deadline, then we have succeeded by leaps and bounds. My guess is some of these guys are cut before we make it to July.
FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.
0 recs |
65 comments
Comments
I think it's funny that we've all completely written off '09
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 26, 2009 10:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I haven't written it off...
but I know there’s a bunch of guys on this year’s team that won’t be on next year’s team.
by PWubbs on Mar 26, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the reality
Isn’t it?
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on Mar 27, 2009 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am excited
about the potential salary dump we are looking at. That money can and should be used well. If we fill these holes with some quality pieces, you are looking at a damn fine team.
I expect that 2 of the Big 3 will pan out nicely, with the 3rd also not being terrible. There are plenty of other arms in the works (Bergesen, Hernandez, Erbe, Britton) that could play a role in the years to come as well.
I personally haven’t written off this year (I expect to be in the double digits in games attended in the minors and majors), and think that there are some fun storylines to watch. The development of Jones and Markakis. The arrival of Wieters. I mean c’mon, ’09 is gonna be fun despite the obvious losses.
O’s go 75-87 this year…
Mood about O's rotation: Depressed : (
by sickuvitall on Mar 26, 2009 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The O's will go 5-157 this year
I have the Arsenal season until May, and then Eagles preseason starts in July. I’ll schedule my vacation in June so I have something to fill the sports void.
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 27, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a Tottenham supporter
so I hate Arsenal, but you guys are on such a tear. You haven’t lost since November. I was an idiot to think Villa had a chance of finishing in the top four ahead of you guys.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Mar 27, 2009 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was actually rooting for Villa
but not at the expense of the Gunners….I thought Chelsea would be the ones to fall out of the top 4
And there’s a good promotion fight going on in the Championship
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 27, 2009 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right now they look like
the worst of the big four. Ballack hasn’t been very good. I don’t think they have much of a shot against Liverpool in the Champions league.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Mar 27, 2009 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahaha...
i laughed the other day when i was at the bbc sport site and there was some comment from a villa fan to the tune of, “we looked so good at christmas…what happened?”
uh…do you not watch the football regularly, sir? i mean, really…given the gruelling schedule of english ball, consistently staying up is a pretty nice accomplishment.
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Mar 27, 2009 5:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm talking about Chelsea
I really don’t think they’re content with just staying in the Premier League every year. A Champion’s league spot is absolutely a given with them.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Mar 27, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The same can be said for all of the big four
The more you get, the more you want….
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 27, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huff will bring back a nice package?
What makes you think this?
He was smoking hot at the trade deadline last year, and no one touched him. I mean, it wasn’t like the offers were weak…there just weren’t any offers.
Why would you think we’ll do better in a year where he’s a two month rental?
Teams are holding onto their blue-chip prospects more than ever. Huff may get some attention, but with this being his last year under control, we’ll get B-level prospects at best.
It's 4 in the morning. Too much to drink. All the girls look hot. So, the Nationals are Jennifer Lopez to me. —Julian Tavarez
by zknower on Mar 27, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Last Year
There was only 1 team in need of a first baseman of the teams that were contending, and they got the guy they wanted in Tex. This season is completely different, and he will be available again. All it takes is one team to need some lefty pop.
Besides, even if they don’t get anything for him, he’ll probably get type A status (if he has a season similar to last year) and warrant us some nice draft pick compensation. Either way, we can’t lose.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huff
That was my first thought too. Huff didn’t garner any interest last year (or maybe the asking price was too high.) I think a LH bat is more important to teams than what position he is going to play. Especially since he, if absolutely forced to, can play 1B, 3B, and LF. I think Luke Scott may be gone before Huff.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Mar 27, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His Contract
Huff’s contract was a problem for people too. No one wanted him that extra year for that amount of money.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
which seemed ridiculous to me at the time
and I was all for keeping Huff at his cheap price (for his production and market value) unless we got another blockbuster haul for him.
but after this offseason, we see that Giambi signed for a fraction of what Huff is getting.
AndHedges: soo... when do I get to throw a couple of pitches and complain about "tightness?"
by CoachOfEarl on Mar 27, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Andy
needs to start getting serious about shopping Luke Scott. He was a nice player to have around, but I want to see Montanez get more AB’s. I think Luke would be an awesome player in the National League coming off the bench as a pinch hitter.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
by jobe on Mar 27, 2009 1:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying Luke shouldn't be traded
But what is this fascination with Montanez? Yes he hit well last year in AA, but it was his third time in AA. And he was all right in the majors but not great. Plus he appeared to have a lot of trouble playing defense.
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 7:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So let me
get this straight…Montanez tore up AA last year (yes, I know, in his third try). He produced rather well with the big club at the end of last year. He has torn it up this spring.
Now let’s suppose he goes down to AAA and tears that shit up too. The entire point of signing a player is to let them show what they can do and earn playing time off of that. Luke Scott is a .250-.260 hitter with nice power but below average run production and speed. Lou Montanez is a .280-.290 hitter with nice power and average run production and speed.
I don’t know why I feel the need to defend him so much. I guess it is just based on the fact that I went to so many Bowie games last year and was just constantly impressed with the guy. This crap about signing someone as ‘minor league filler’ is nonsense. Yeah the guy is 28 and missed his original calling, but doesn’t everyone deserve a second chance.
I pray that one day Luke Scott is dealt and Montanez gets some real playing time. Then I will pray that he does well. Then I will make a fanpost completely dedicated to why people need to stop being so judgmental about past failures and focus on what someone has done lately…
Mood about O's rotation: Depressed : (
by sickuvitall on Mar 27, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
because in baseball
a long history of poor past performance is a good indicator of continued poor performance. regression to the mean is the relentless law of the sport.
I’d love to be proven wrong and see Montanez replicate his AA numbers in the majors. but I’m confident he won’t.
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 27, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he tears up AAA
and forces his way up, so be it. I don’t put much stock into spring training performances, and I don’t put much stock on a guy finally putting it together when he’s 27 and playing in AA for the third time. I hope you’re right, though. Like SC in the Cabrera Bowl, it’s good if I lose this sort of argument because then we both win because it mean Montanez is good.
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Left field
is one of the more interesting story lines this year. Its funny how none of us even mentioned Felix Pie as someone who could prevent all of this from even being an issue. If he plays well (which it doesn’t appear likely), then this discussion is moot.
Mood about O's rotation: Depressed : (
by sickuvitall on Mar 27, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i have more hope for Pie
than I do for Montanez
which just shows how we can ALL be fooled by one thing or the other. pick your poison, I guess.
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 27, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is...
some theory that a certain degree of spring fever can be predictive wrt in-season success. i think i read that over a certain number of at bats, a spring slg that exceeds career slg by a certain percentage is a pretty strong indicator.
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Mar 27, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scott
You realize he was a late-bloomer who didn’t really do much until he was around Montanez’s age or later.
Montanez has earned the right to play left field everyday to see if he is for real or not. At least he has earned the right to platoon with Scott or Pie. Pie, the supposed defensive wizz, is making routine mistakes in left field and complains it is not his normal position. I don’t think we can get any worse out there unless we shove Scott into that position.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luke got a late start, yes
but if you look at their minor league numbers, they aren’t the same. Obviously I don’t know enough about the parks he was playing in blah blah to make a definitive determination but Luke continued to hit better each level he progressed and Lou did not.
Look I think it’d be great if Montanez turns out, but I don’t think he’s “earned” anything. You act like he’s been tearing it up for years down there. The one you really need to be looking at displacing Luke is Reimold (which you mentioned I know. But you also mentioned Scott Moore being a viable replacement for Luke which is just ridiculous).
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moore Was Mentioned Because of Position Flexibility
With Scott, you only have a platoon outfielder who is average to below average in the field. He has some pop, but he does not have enough to validate a .250 average. Essentially, he is a bad imitation of Jim Thome since no one really wants him in the field.
Reimold I see as our future LF and possibly the LF later this year. Montanez should be our LF now or in a platoon with Pie.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to most advanced defensive metrics
Scott was actually well above average defensively. I was surprised by this, but it kept cropping up.
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 27, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scott
He was Lou’s age now when he was putting up those numbers which you have referred, and he didn’t reach AAA until he was 27. Lou will be 27 this season, and playing everyday at AAA until the Orioles are forced to bring him up.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luke started later because he went to college
but the age wasn’t what I was referring to. What I was referring to was this:
Luke’s OPS
2002 in A/A+: .802
2003 in A+/AA: .821
2004 in A+/AA: .943
2005 in AAA: .966
Lou’s OPS
2000 in Rookie/A: .878
2001 in A: .677
2002 in A+: .679
2003 in A+: .634
2004 in A+/A-: .815
2005 in A/AA: .905 in A and .704 in AA for a total of .840
2006 in AA/AAA: .927 in AA and .652 in AAA for a total of .755
2007 in AA/AAA: .828 in AAA and .742 in AAA for a total of .773
2008 in AA the entire year: .986
So it took him four years to figure out A ball pitching and four more to figure out AA. So I’d say in about 2012 he’ll be ready to conquer AAA.
Please understand I’m not saying that Luke is the end all. I don’t think he is. But it’s just ludicrous to say Lou should be getting ABs over him.
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oops
that first AAA in 2007 should be AA obviously.
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will not deny that Scott has better OPS in the Minors
Scott was more a power threat, but it took him the same amount of time in age to get to AAA. College players evolve faster than High School players, and it took Scott 3 years to rise up and stick above A ball. Maybe he wasn’t being rushed, but he didn’t figure it out until he was 26 just like Montanez.
Your original argument was that Montanez was not a stud when he came up to the majors and that he had trouble playing defense. Would you rather have someone with much less range and less of an arm in Scott roaming left field? You might lose raw power in the line-up, but I think you gain more contact and extra base threat in Montanez. Lou has shown improvement in the field according to the coaches, and this is his last year before Reimold is a major league regular (probably).
In the end, I think he’ll be the first call-up if Pie or Scott fails/gets hurt.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know much about defensive metrics
So I can’t say anything with certainty, but I’m going to need a little proof before conceding Montanez is better in the field than Scott.
I will not rest until America has universal health care and Derek Jeter is seen for the overrated starfucker he truly is! ~2632
by Stacey on Mar 27, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know about catching the ball
but I thought Montanez’s throwing arm was very below avg.
by sanders833 on Mar 27, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We've been down this road before
Can we stop talking about Montanez being good? He’s not. He never will be.
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 28, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the end, I think he’ll be the first call-up if Pie or Scott fails/gets hurt.
Oh, that I agree with. I thought you were trying to say that Montanez has earned a starting role. That I’m not so sure about. He looks like a 4th OF to me.
"Your wife told you to play in New York.
Well, my wife told me you look like a dork." Boo Teixeira guys.
by birdman on Mar 27, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the issue of comparable development time
is largely immaterial, It happens to be the case that generally, players who have never been able to succeed before the age of 27 are very rarely ever going to succeed. The fact that Luke Scott was able to do this, does not, in any way, indicate the other players are likely to do this.
Also, by all accounts, Lou is AWFUL in the outfield (scouting reports to advanced metrics all say this), while Luke is just fine.
as an aside I also take issue with the idea that we should lock Chris Ray down.
by ItsBenFeldman on Mar 27, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously I don’t know enough about the parks he was playing in blah blah to make a definitive determination
Ask Jim Palmer. He’ll tell you about the time he went to Round Rock and saw Luke Scott hit 74 home runs IN ONE GAME
"If they cut my bald head open, they will find one big boxing glove. That's all I am. I live it." -- Marvin Hagler
by SC on Mar 28, 2009 5:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Luke Scott
You’re kidding about replacing his production easily in-house, right? You say not to be fooled by Guthrie’s spring, but you’ve clearly been fooled by Montanez’s spring. And I root for Scott Moore, but let’s be honest, he’s a AAA ballplayer with some AAAA stopgap potential at best. And we don’t really know what Reimold is yet. If Luke is still under arbitration, he’s not going to be that expensive — he’s not going to win Miguel Cabrera-type money in arb. Keep him. Let someone play him out of a job against lefties, or better yet put that person at 1B.
by punkrawka on Mar 27, 2009 7:39 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Scott is making $2.4M
This was his first year for arbitration. It will only go up from there, and he is someone who desperately needs a platoon (hello Wigginton). Wigginton alone could put up similar or better numbers than Scott without a platoon as well as position flexibility.
Scott is not needed on this team.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Montanez
He had a great year last year both in the minors and majors. He has had a solid spring and played better than Pie and earned the right to play, but he will be in AAA tearing it up waiting for his chance.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are really overstating the case
.316 OBP and 98 OPS+ in the majors last year is most certainly not a great year. and yes, his AA numbers were awesome last year. His minor league history suggests that this success will not be repeated in AAA; he’s gone over .900 OPS in AA before, been promoted to AAA only to fall back into the 700 or even 600s. If he posts the numbers in Norfolk he did in Bowie, then he probably does deserve a shot. But his history says he won’t.
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 27, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
History
Means nothing compared to what you are doing today. Honestly, if he turns out to be a good bat with 4th outfielder ability, I think we should be happy that we got major league talent from him.
I just can’t believe so many fans are hating on Montanez because he did not live up to the hype of his former draft status and his age. If he put up those numbers and was 23, everyone would be pushing for him to start in LF and bat in the heart of the order.
I like Reimold, and I am not saying he is better than Reimold. I am simply saying he has played better than Pie. Let it be known I am not a believer in Pie at all.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Wubbs
on the fact that anything we get out of Montanez is an unexpected bonus and we should embrace his success rather than shun him off as a career minor leaguer.
Mood about O's rotation: Depressed : (
by sickuvitall on Mar 27, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
History means nothing compared to what you are doing today
I would like to propose that in the context of baseball this is the worst possible way I can think of to run a team.
by robustyoungsoul on Mar 27, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
History means nothing compared to what you are doing today
And what is he doing today? Tearing up spring training?! .316 OBP and 98 OPS+ in the majors last year!? Montanez provides depth in case of injuries. That’s pretty much what he deserves given his track record.
"Your wife told you to play in New York.
Well, my wife told me you look like a dork." Boo Teixeira guys.
by birdman on Mar 27, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Montanez is an old man
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 28, 2009 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so if I'm hitting .500 this week
it doesn’t matter if I’m a carer .230 hitter? nonsense. regression to the mean. I would love to be wrong, but history IS important.
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 27, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Montanez has always hit pretty well
but he has not had an everyday job. Look at his numbers for 2005. He had a solid season with almost 500 AB’s. The next two years he lost 100 AB’s then another 50 AB’s. It was not until last year that he saw consistent playing time again.
If you want to bash his numbers, you could at least realize the situation he was in.
by PWubbs on Mar 27, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By this logic we should start Gomez
since he’s hitting like .042 now, he’ll regress to .220 or whatever his average is.
AndHedges: soo... when do I get to throw a couple of pitches and complain about "tightness?"
by CoachOfEarl on Mar 27, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The situation he was in
… is that he needs to get on base. That’s a hitter’s job.
Of course you hope he bucks the trend of history. But to suggest that this guy is definitely the future – that’s a stretch.
by robustyoungsoul on Mar 27, 2009 2:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Keep Luuuke, trade Lou
Didn’t we just sign Luke to a $2.4M contract? That’ll be tough to unload.
Montanez has a better shot at bringing back loot in a trade, as a low risk 4th OF.
I like them both but I think I’ll take Scott over Montanez in my lineup when Pie doesn’t pan out.
AndHedges: soo... when do I get to throw a couple of pitches and complain about "tightness?"
by CoachOfEarl on Mar 27, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You have angered
Luuuuuke. He has responded by going yard not once, but twice today.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Mar 27, 2009 5:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And then shoot out your van's tires

"Any guitar solos you hear on the record where it sounds like one note, sounds like Meg White playing guitar -- that's me. Any real guitar solo where a guitar comes in and you go, 'F--k, that sounds awesome!' -- that's not me." - Josh Freese
by duck on Mar 27, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly
the first guy I’d go to and tell he’s been lifted from LF for a guy that’s never really lived up to his hype.
Always trust your cape. -Guy Clark
by BPinOK on Mar 27, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and if he dont get you with the gun
he just whips out the bow…
by sanders833 on Mar 27, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only post that makes sense in this article
"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."
by exitfare on Mar 28, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More AB for Montanez and Reimold
Let’s start shopping Huff and Scott as soon as possible. i am sure we could get some prospects for them and clear our books of their salaries. This would also free room for more AB for Pia, Montanez and Reimold. I wonder if Reimold could move to first base? We should go with youth and not just make it a slogan.
by Baysox39 on Mar 29, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Neither or their salaries are harming anything and Huff’s in the last year of his deal anyway. I’m not being a stickler but unless the point is seriously to pay your team what the Yankees pay Jeter annually, you don’t just throw unproven players at every position. It won’t happen and probably shouldn’t.
"If they cut my bald head open, they will find one big boxing glove. That's all I am. I live it." -- Marvin Hagler
by SC on Mar 29, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
late to the game
But my thoughts:
I would definitely not offer Huff arbitration unless we essentially replicates 2008 (in which case you’d have to trade him). Aubrey’s OPS+ last 4 years: 98, 108, 103, 135. I get that there was no trade market for him last summer or this off-season, especially when guys like Adam Dunn was getting jobbed around. But I’m not sure why that still won’t be the case next off-season. And while it’s true that I’m not his biggest fan, my biggest fear with offering him arbitration is that he might just accept it.
I think Luke Scott’s fate is tied to Pie’s. If Felix can’t put it together by June than you drop him and call up Reimold and keep Scott as the DH. If Felix does put it together than you can trade Scott or move Reimold to first, but Reimold can’t be here with Scott and Huff (and Wieters) getting ABs at DH.
I’m also thinking MacPhail is praying that Wigginton is the 2010 3B stopgap for Rowell. I don’t think Billy makes it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this is MacPhail’s thinking.
Librarians are hiding something
by dfa on Mar 29, 2009 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of Rowell...
Does his moving to OF (and therefore likely end of his career) make Scoot Moore the 3B of the future?
…Did I just write that?
Just because you know how to read, doesn't mean you'll like the book.
by arlingtonOsFan on Mar 30, 2009 5:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There is no 3B of the future right now. Moore is groomed to take over for a couple years, perhaps, Wigginton might get 2010, etc. It’s just going to be filling the hole until there’s someone drafted or available in free agency that will be good for the long haul.
"If they cut my bald head open, they will find one big boxing glove. That's all I am. I live it." -- Marvin Hagler
by SC on Mar 31, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moore is being groomed for the bench.
"Your wife told you to play in New York.
Well, my wife told me you look like a dork." Boo Teixeira guys.
by birdman on Mar 31, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















