Just How Much of a Rat Is Tejada, Really?
This New York Times article is absolutely breathtaking.
It suggests the depths of Miguel Tejada's corruption are so deep, so pervasive, that his entire career may be a fraud.
It suggests, for example, that he and countryman Tony Batista dogged it on defense when the other hit a pop fly or grounder.
It suggests Tejada tipped pitches and took tips in return.
And it says many of his teammates suspected it and at one point things almost boiled over.
We already know Tejada:
1) Plead guilty to lying to federal investigators Congress about steroids and
2) Juiced himself and
3) Rafael Palmeiro continues insist he unwittingly took Tejada 'roids
The Palmeiro allegations seem outlandish. We all know this. But there is an overall trend line here. And it doesn't look good for Tejada.
This New York Times story -- if any of it is true -- suggests Tejada has stooped to the some of the lowest depths possible by a ballplayer.
What's your take? I say .... the truth is out there and it's getting uglier by the year. .
FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.
3 recs |
145 comments
Comments
Wow
That’s pretty disturbing.
I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry
by Stacey on Aug 30, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I’m at a lack of words.
"All major leaguers can see the ball and hit it. But what separates the great ones is that they can see the ball and hit it were they want to hit it."
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Aug 30, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He's starting to sound like A*Roid
"All major leaguers can see the ball and hit it. But what separates the great ones is that they can see the ball and hit it were they want to hit it."
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Aug 30, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
apparently thats what i’m supposed to say in this thread.
Matt Wieters can get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop in under one lick.
by daveh873 on Aug 30, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WOW
"Chicks who dig home runs aren’t the ones who appeal to me," he said. "I think there’s sexiness in infield hits because they require technique. I’d rather impress the chicks with my technique than with my brute strength. Then, every now and then, just to show I can do that, too, I might flirt a little by hitting one out."
by WestcoastO'sFan on Aug 30, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And how could we forget
the whole age fiasco?? So the guy is an old juiced liar…nice!!
by sickuvitall on Aug 30, 2009 10:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you guys have heard
about the thing with raffy and miggy’s wife, haven’t you?
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
really?
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you wake up on the wrong side of the bed or something?
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually meant to hit cancel
I was going to say that it was another strike against tejada, but I’m not awake enough to actually form complete sentences. As evidenced by hitting post instead of cancel. Apologies if you were offended, no offense was intended.
by PhilR8 on Aug 30, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no worries
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
dont know if its true,
got to find the email hang on
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Some interesting quotes in that article
It seems like anybody is willing to admit for attribution that they’re sure there’s this kind of pitch tipping going on somewhere in baseball, but they “don’t know” who.
Color me skeptical that no one actually knows. I bet they were willing to recall some vague frustrations for the reporter but not actually dime on anybody. Sounds like some other problem with baseball we might name, huh?
Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008
by Eat More Esskay on Aug 30, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
miggy's revenge
So I was grabbing a beer with this kid on my soccer team last night who worked at ESPN for the past 3 years as a fact checker for Baseball Tonight, and he told me a few great stories. He went out for drinks with the whole squad; Kruck, Ravich, etc. and they were all sharing juicy stories from the big leagues, and Kruck drops this absolute gem. Apparently Raphael Palmiero was notorious for nailing his teammates’ wives, it was sorta like a game to him. So the reason he got shipped from the Rangers to the O’s is that he simply slayed half of the Rangers’ wives. So he gets to the O’s where Miguel Tejada is the big man on the team, and I guess everyone on the team would just shoot eachother up with whatever supplement they were taking. Both Palmiero and Tejada took B9 (which is legal), and they would routinely inject eachother. So after a while, Palmiero starts nailing Tejada’s wife, and Tejada finds out. So rather than fight him or whatever, the next time Tejada goes to inject B9 into Palmiero, he fills the syringe with steroids and injects it into Palmiero. Palmiero subsequently fails his drug test, and his career was over. Palmiero tried to tell the media that Tejada injected him with the steroids against his knowledge, but no one in the media/general public bought it cuz Palmiero seems like such a doosh, but it was totally true. This is why Palmiero has never been called back to trial for perjury for lying to Congress because he never actually knowingly took steroids. Pretty crazy, right?
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
yet not entirely unbelievable
i don’t knwo about the whole wife-nailing aspect, but there has always been something about raffy’s case that didn’t add up.
"The single best thing any rebuilding manager can do, ever, is trade a relief pitcher in late July for a couple of solid prospects."
— Rob Neyer, July 30, 2009
by zknower on Aug 30, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I'm so sure
BTW, it’s B12, not B9. B9 is folic acid, which is what pregnant ladies take to stay healthy.
I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry
by Stacey on Aug 30, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it was B9
and this story just got a lot more complicated.
by kba26 on Aug 30, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't we sign Palmeiro as a free agent?
Both times?
Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008
by Eat More Esskay on Aug 30, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
didn’t the Rangers also sign him twice? Did they think he stopped his teammate’s wife banging ways the second time?
I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry
by Stacey on Aug 30, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ALSO
Who are all of these skanky players wives who will sleep with their husbands’ teammates?
I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry
by Stacey on Aug 30, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't you know?
All baseball player’s wives are easily conquerable and will basically sleep with any guy that crosses their path. It makes total sense that Raffy could have “slayed half the Rangers’ wives.”
by O Nina on Aug 30, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
silly, slutty women
I guess they are incapable of turning down any man with money and a sweet cuban mustache.
I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry
by Stacey on Aug 30, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not just the sweet stache...
remember: raffy used to rock a pretty powerful mullet, too.
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Aug 30, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This all may explain
the Viagra commercials.
Jioe Flaacco, Hon!!! "He’s like a live JUGS machine."
by dayzd toe on Aug 31, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i WILL say...
i had heard a variation on this in relation to palmeiro and the cubs. like, it was raffy having having issues w/ mark grace and/or rhino sandberg that precipitated his trade to texas. i thought it was.
i think it’s funny that the source of this story is a fact checker and he apparently got sorta bamboozled.
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Aug 30, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they figured once he was doing Viagra commercials he was out of that business
Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008
by Eat More Esskay on Aug 30, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i should have mentioned
that i obv didnt write this, this came from a friend of a friend, etc, etc. but i still kind of want to believe it, i used to love raffy.
miggy and his dominican comrades, doing it for the stats, what bullshit, i loved that espn interview about his birth certificate. what a soap opera
"you know what the orioles could use right now? a day off." - joe angel
by swilhelmross on Aug 30, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your a fan of Palmeiro
so you want to believe he’s a home-wrecking asshole that slept with half his teammates’ wives for sport? That’s kinda fucked up.
by NickMarkaces on Aug 30, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow when you put it that way...
no matter what Raffy is a douche
Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax ~ Mike Royko
by Graham71681 on Aug 31, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha yeah
Either way, Palmeiro is an asshole.
I was looking forward to Raffy going in to the Hall as an Oriole, but that’s obviously not happening now.
"There's only one cure for what's wrong with all of us pitchers, and that's to take a year off. Then, after you've gone a year without throwing, quit altogether." -Jim Palmer
by Baltimo on Aug 31, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously
How on earth that would be better than being a garden variety steroid user is beyond me.
"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver
by rebop on Aug 31, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if you are limiting your scope to just baseball and
your favorite Orioles, then it could make a difference. Most people don’t pay a lot of attention to what sort of person an athlete is away from the game.
In this instance, one is not rating Palmeiro as a human being, but as a baseball player. Knowing that his numbers were in fact from his own abilities and not the result of performance inhancing drugs can then be a reassurance that the player you rooted for was in fact the player you thought he was. That he may have been banging the wives of half his teammates is irrelevant, as who ever stops to think about something like that.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Sep 1, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
“Most people don’t pay a lot of attention to what sort of person an athlete is away from the game.”
Sure, I don’t typically care about what players do off the field so long as it isn’t illegal and doesn’t embarrass the organization. But if you are relying on this story to somehow “redeem” Raffy, you’ve obviously waded pretty deep into his personal life.
It’s hard for me to imagine being able to compartmentalize things so completely that you would say, “I love Rafael Palmeiro because he never used ’roids, he just loved to sleep with all his teammates wives.” It just seems like grasping at straws in a pretty bizarre way.
"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver
by rebop on Sep 1, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not relying on anything.
I’m not the person saying it makes a difference. I am just explaining how it could for somebody.
That doesn’t mean it would make a difference for everybody. For me, well, yes, if true, then I’m glad that Palmeiro got his numbers legally. I was always a fan. BUt whatever he’s regained in terms of my appreciation of him as a baseball player is probably lost with regard to the lack of respect I would have over his personal behavior.
Still, I don’t know Palmeiro personally. Only as a ballplayer. And as a ballplayer, I have (or had anyway) a lot of respect for him. As far as Palmeiro the person goes, I would lack respect for him, where the story true, but I also would not judge him. As I was reminded in Mass this past Sunday, being judgemental of others is one of the traits that takes us further from God, not closer.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Sep 1, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay...
I was only responding to your hypothetical in my previous post.
The whole story just strikes me as pretty ridiculous, and very unlikely to be true. It seems like a way of grasping at straws for someone (maybe not you) who desperately wants to believe that Palmiero didn’t use ’roids.
But the simple fact is that he tested positive for them, and the most likely explanation for that fact is that he was a steroid user. As far as other possible explanations go, this one strikes me as pretty far-fetched, especially since no one is willing to make the claim for attribution. If Raffy wants to step forward with the “I was banging my teammate’s wife” defense, I’ll give it the consideration it deserves.
"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver
by rebop on Sep 1, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is interesting
"All major leaguers can see the ball and hit it. But what separates the great ones is that they can see the ball and hit it were they want to hit it."
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Aug 30, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It'd be easier for me to believe if...
…I didn’t have my suspicions earlier. When Palmeiro first came back in 2004 I thought he looked bigger than his first stint with the O’s. At the time I just tried not to believe it, but I had doubts in the back of my mind. Plus Canseco ratted him out in his book, and so far he’s be right more times than not.
by edsachs1 on Aug 30, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intriguing story
might be more believable if you could spell.
"Take on Me" - a-ha
by exitfare on Aug 31, 2009 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure...
he wasn’t a fact checker for Melrose Place?
"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver
by rebop on Aug 31, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you meant B12 rather than B9 (is that even a real thing??).
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
"All major leaguers can see the ball and hit it. But what separates the great ones is that they can see the ball and hit it were they want to hit it."
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Aug 31, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You bang me wife! ha ha that wasn't the legal shit I shot in your ass today!

"You don't EVEN KNOW who Nick Markakis is"- .....My 4 year old daughter to another kid.
"Fly Eagles Fly..Miss you Dawk."
by O's21girl on Sep 1, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
About Palmeiro...
I tend to be very cynical about players and steroid use. In baseball and every other sport, athletes are always quick to come up with some kind of excuse or another for a positive test or a credible report. Someone spiked my drink, or it was from a cold medicine, or it was in my toothpaste (really), or it was over-the-counter supplements, or I didn’t know they were steroids, or I tried it once to recover from an injury and have stopped since, etc. etc. Each one maybe plausible (or not) individually, but eventually you realize they’re all making stuff up. In fact, one of the few positives of the baseball steroid scandal is that a small number of the players have actually admitted that yes, they took them, and knew they were taking them.
Having said all that, the one player that I sort of believed was Palmeiro. There’s something about his story, the vehemence with which he argues it, and the circumstances around it, that makes it more believable. If nothing else good comes out of all of this, I hope that it turns out that Palmeiro was clean after all.
by Bad Horse on Aug 30, 2009 4:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is disgusting
Baseball really isn’t fun at all.
"There's only one cure for what's wrong with all of us pitchers, and that's to take a year off. Then, after you've gone a year without throwing, quit altogether." -Jim Palmer
by Baltimo on Aug 30, 2009 8:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Man, that's disgusting.
"He's a gazelle." -Adam Jones on Nolan Reimold.
by LenaO on Aug 30, 2009 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I find this disturbing
but to me it doesn’t rank with PED use or gambling, etc.
I mean, John Kruk once told a story about how he got his last hit, to secure a lifetime .300 AVG, because Scott Erickson agreed to groove him one…did he get flak for that or did people say “oh, Krukker, lulz.”
I just don’t see how this is WORSE than what we already know about Tejada…not entirely anyway. I can certainly see the “integrity of the game” argument, etc etc…
"Might as well just win this game." - Adam Jones, 4/17/2008
Adam Jones is the tits.
by KenDixonFanClub on Aug 30, 2009 9:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Y'know...
…for years I watched this fucking guy not make routine plays on grounders and wondered how the fuck he could play shortstop with such limited range. But now I read this.
I don’t know. I’m a little torn. He was such a crappy SS while on the O’s that it’s almost hard to believe him dogging it so often was actually intentional. But after so many things coming out about this jerk, he is unquestionably a scumbag. Good riddance.
by Jonny Pops on Aug 30, 2009 10:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just to offer the other side of this argument
Deadspin’s Tommy Craggs doesn’t buy it.
"The United States is the New York Yankees of countries...powerful and respected until the year 2000." - Homer J. Simpson
by Brotz13 on Aug 30, 2009 11:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Your point being?
Did you read it, or are you just making a blanket assumption about its quality? Craggs is a good writer with a provocative point of view. As he shows in his take on the article, baseball people have been making these assumptions about Latino players for decades without any concrete evidence.
"The United States is the New York Yankees of countries...powerful and respected until the year 2000." - Homer J. Simpson
by Brotz13 on Aug 31, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve got to say that I wasn’t too impressed with Cragg’s counterpoint. Racial profiling… I don’t know, I’m more inclined to believe that Frank Mech and others saw something legitimately fishy rather than engaging in McCarthyism. There were plenty of other DR players but Miggy is the one drawing attention from teammates based on his behavior (fairly or unfairly)… that we know of.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's possible...
but as even the accusers note, not possible to prove. And clubhouses often end up fractured along racial or ethnic lines.
I have to say, I am very confused as to why the Times ran this story unless there is something else bubbling under that is about to break. The fact that there was some tension and (unprovable) suspicion in the A’s clubhouse seven years ago hardly seems like news.
"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver
by rebop on Aug 31, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s possible but as even the accusers note, not possible to prove. And clubhouses often end up fractured along racial or ethnic lines.
It’s definitely possible that Tejada was tipping pitches to his DR buddies. In fact, if Tejada was tipping pitchers I expect it would happen along racial or ethnic lines. But the deadspin guy was saying the white players were engaging in McCarthyism and when I think of that word I envision a witch hunt to find pitch tippers w/o prior cause, which I don’t think is the case.
I have to say, I am very confused as to why the Times ran this story unless there is something else bubbling under that is about to break. The fact that there was some tension and (unprovable) suspicion in the A’s clubhouse seven years ago hardly seems like news.
Word booty.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The NY times article
The specifics in that article, specifically with guys going out on the record, is pretty alarming. I can’t imagine he was pitch tipping in Baltimore because the pitchers were so bad without any help from Miggy. But how common is pitch tipping anyway (not to be naive)? And was TBat dropping foul balls on purpose while an Oriole? Given Batista’s range, it’s kind of surprising he got to many foul balls to drop.
Librarians are hiding something
by dfa on Aug 31, 2009 2:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the guys going on the record...
kind of gutless, if you ask me. they seem to say just enough to create suspicion, but they don’t really say anything concrete. i think the nyt article is sort of bullshit.
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Aug 31, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Wayward...
I just realized my tattoo is the same as your avatar, only it’s not waving. What a nice logo.
The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST
by the fix is in on Aug 31, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just took a job in Houston!
Yay, Miggy reunion!
Just because you know how to read, doesn't mean you'll like the book.
by arlingtonOsFan on Aug 31, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
par-tay!
B-9 par-tay!
"If they pitch to you, make them pay."
--Diamond Dave to the Phenom
by j.q. higgins on Aug 31, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Livan's quote about fighting him right on the field.
That would be awesome and well deserved if this is actually true. I have my doubts. Pretty shoddy story if you ask me. Totally relying on rumors and bits and pieces of stories. I thought they were going to do an advanced statistical analysis of how Tejada’s “friends” do against his teams compared to other teams.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 6:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm probably going to regret posting this...
Totally relying on rumors and bits and pieces of stories.
Actually, that’s what I exactly liked about this story. It’s not rumors. Unlike the A-Rod story about tipping pitches, in this story, actual players (Frank Menechino in particular but also Hudson acknowledged that such suspicions were being voiced while not voicing his own opinion) are on the record confirming events. Tejada, the man accused, confirms that fellow players thought he was engaged in fishy behavior (see the first few paragraphs on the second page). Now, of course, whether or not Tejada was actually tipped pitches is PURE speculation and unverifiable as the author repeatedly points out (and players too, see Frank Mech and Hudson for example). But story does provide actual names of players on the record verifying that his peers felt was something was fishy about Tejada. Look, I’m not saying this some great piece of journalism. In fact, I think it’s kind of soapy opry piece of journalism (ok so, Frank Mech goes on the record saying his teammates thought Tejada was fishy, do this really constitute a whole story… I guess, maybe as long as you acknowledge that this is a gossipy piece but I’ll admit I have a soft spot for gossip). But this story isn’t based on rumor like the Selena Roberts stuff on A-Rod.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
I don’t want to start a big thing, but “actual players” voicing suspicions is very much rumor and bits and pieces of stories. It’s not even close to fact or evidence.
If you view the story as being about the meeting they had to discuss it then fine it’s a fine story.
But if you want to view it as a story about whether Tejada is a cheater who helps his buddies on other team gets hits it’s not a quality piece of journalism because it relies on rumors, innuendo, and a very small sample size of circumstantial statistical evidence.
I think it’s pretty much exactly the same thing as the Selena Roberts stuff except that they have vague quotes from some players.
It really could be a good story if they weren’t too lazy to do the statistical analysis. Find 10 guys that Tejada is friends with and research how they did against his team, how they did in situations that didn’t matter, etc. But they didn’t do that – they talked about one instance 8 years ago and had quotes about it.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the times reported that Oakland manager called meeting to clear air
because players thought Tejada was tipping. that’s as solid as it gets and as far as i can tell unrefuted.
tell me, what stat do you have for “friendship”? can you do a statistical analysis of which guys tejada had a beer with?
by thewaywardO on Aug 31, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about picking 8-10 guys that he’s friends with? Doesn’t seem that challenging to me. Guys he played with growing up and in the offseason. Pretty simple.
As far as your first point, sorry but guys thinking Tejada was tipping just doesn’t seem very solid to me. I think lots of things – doesn’t make them facts.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about you can't do a statistical analysis if you're just picking guys out of a hat
by thewaywardO on Aug 31, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm
picking guys out of a hat or picking guys he grew up playing with? Same thing or different things?
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
let me know when you get that analysis done
i’m breathlessly awaiting the results.
by thewaywardO on Sep 1, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't realize that
Looking at who he works out with in the offseason and who he grew up playing with and is currently in the major leagues was a complex analysis…
by O'sFan21 on Sep 3, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what's up with all the LOL
I don’t want to start a big thing, but "actual players" voicing suspicions is very much rumor and bits and pieces of stories. It’s not even close to fact or evidence.
That’s what a lot of reporting is about. Reporting what people said! Rumors is when nobody has the balls to confirm something ON THE RECORD (see the Palmiero story slaying players’ wives, now that’s a rumor). This is anything but a rumor. Tejada, the man accused, confirmed the story for the love of god!!! If that’s a rumor, well, you go on believing whatever you think constitutes a rumor.
If you view the story as being about the meeting they had to discuss it then fine it’s a fine story.
Like I already said, it’s a gossipy piece. But the key players confirm ON THE RECORD that meeting took place to confront Tejada’s shady ways. Whether or not this constitutes a story, well, I’ll leave that up to each reader.
It really could be a good story if they weren’t too lazy to do the statistical analysis. Find 10 guys that Tejada is friends with and research how they did against his team, how they did in situations that didn’t matter, etc. But they didn’t do that – they talked about one instance 8 years ago and had quotes about it.
Completely agree.
I think it’s pretty much exactly the same thing as the Selena Roberts stuff except that they have vague quotes from some players.
There no named players in the Selena Roberts story. Completely different animal.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
The LOL was about you saying you might regret this.
Rumor to me=he said she said. How do rumors occur if not somebody telling them to somebody else? That’s what this is to me.
And like I said the only difference between this and the Roberts piece is the players are named.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rumor to me=he said she said. How do rumors occur if not somebody telling them to somebody else? That’s what this is to me.
Then a lot of legit journalism is just rumors. Getting people on the record and reporting it is what journalism is all about because reporters often time can’t be there person to personally witness the event they’re writing about (this is less true in sports though). So if a white house staffer sits on a meeting where the president meets with person X and the staffer relays this information to a reporter, we’re suppose to describe the story as mere rumor because the story is merely a he said/she said? And if Tejada story is rumor, what do you call the story about Raffy slaying player’s wives where NOBODY is on the record?
And like I said the only difference between this and the Roberts piece is the players are named.
Yup, and that’s a HUGE difference.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the people weren’t reporting what ACTUALLY happened (as in the president met with x and this is what they said), the people were saying that they thought Tejada was helping his friends on other teams. That’s something that’s impossible to provie (and they didn’t even try to analyze it).
And it’s a big difference, but I don’t know if it’s a huge difference. Do you assume the players that Roberts referred to don’t exist??? If she made it up then it would be completely different, but the fact that they didn’t want their name in the piece really doesn’t seem very different to me.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the people weren’t reporting what ACTUALLY happened (as in the president met with x and this is what they said), the people were saying that they thought Tejada was helping his friends on other teams. That’s something that’s impossible to provie (and they didn’t even try to analyze it).
Like I’ve already said, 1) the author goes out of way his to say that there’s no definitive proof and 2) the author makes it clear his story is about reporting people’s thoughts/opinions on Tejada and his so called shady ways. He’s not trying to report what actually happened (i.e., did Tejada cheat), he’s writing a story about what his teammates think… perfectly fair game… like I said a little gossipy but it’s NOT some rumor story.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why I said it’s a fluff piece! Not worth even discussing.
I heard Raffy bones other players’ wives! Fact!
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why I said it’s a fluff piece! Not worth even discussing.
Yeah, I don’t have a problem with that. Like i said, it’s gossipy but I like gossip.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok…well then I’m not sure what your issue with my statement was.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That the story is a rumor. It’s not rumor. People are on the record. That’s not a rumor. The jazz about Raffy slaying player’s wives, NOW THAT’S RUMOR. Selena Roberts’ story on A-Rod. That’s rumor. Nobody is on the record in either case. In this case, we have confirmation from players on the record confirming that a meeting took place to confront Tejada regarding his shady ways. THAT"S NOT A RUMOR.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somebody thought something and told a reporter about it. That’s a rumor to me.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this makes zero sense.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok. Not sure what else to tell you if that doesn’t make sense.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This isn’t a “somebody thought something and told a reporter about it” case. This is statement has nothing to do with the story. The story is that a meeting took place (it’s not somebody thought something, a thought and an actual EVENT are different things, surely you recognize this), CONFIRMED by various players, about Tejada’s shady ways. The author then goes out of his way that there’s no proof confirming these accuations. This isn’t somebody thought the color is blue is the best color ever. This is a story about an event and player opinion about the event itself.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok…you’ve got me…it’s about a meeting that took place because somebody thought something and told somebody about it and then a reporter found out 8 years later…
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
somebody didn’t just thought a meeting happened… the meeting isn’t just some mental imagination…. IT HAPPENED. Key participants confirm it on the record… pretty standard journalistic standard for reporting stuff. And when the player in question even confirms the event in question, I’m inclined to believe the said event happened (as oppose to being a mental imagination as you keep saying).
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think you misread or something. Here’s what I said:
it’s about a meeting that took place because somebody thought something and told somebody about it and then a reporter found out 8 years later…
Concentrate please.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Concentrate please.
Um thanks dude.
it’s about a meeting that took place because somebody thought something and told somebody about it and then a reporter found out 8 years later…
Apparently, by implication, you think the majority of stories are just rumors then because your very quote is pretty much what a lot of regular stories are (i.e., an event happended, somebody thought something about it, and that somebody told a reporter).
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My “concentrate please” was in response to you either misreading or just completely making up that I said somebody THOUGHT the meeting happened.
Seriously concentrate a little. You’re bouncing all over the place.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m just keeping you logically honest, like I said, your block quote is pretty much what a lot new stories are (i.e., an event happens, it’s corroborated, people around the event offer opinions). Either you think that a lot stories are just rumors or you have a non-traditional definition of rumor. if I’m bouncing all over the place, my bad.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok.
So you did misread? Or were you trying to make up that I said the meeting was imagined?
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I apologize for saying you said that the meeting was imagined. My other points still stand.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said 5 or 6 times before. If the central point of the article had been the meeting that was held (which was really the only fact in the article other than the stats of those 3 games) that would be fine. But that wasn’t the point of the article – the point was whether or not Tejada is a cheater who botches plays and tips pitches for his friends. Otherwise the title would have been “A’s hold meeting to discuss suspicions of Tejada”.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But that wasn’t the point of the article – the point was whether or not Tejada is a cheater who botches plays and tips pitches for his friends.
Well, it’s sort of both… that is the article is about the meeting and the implications it carries. One implication is that some of his peers believe that he’s shady. NOTE the nuance. His peers believe that he’s shady, not that he IS shady when the author goes out of the way to say that are NO FACTS to prove that Tejada is tipping pitches. AGAIN, the author goes out of his way to say that there ARE NO FACTS to prove Tejada is shady. He’s reporting that some of his teammates believe he is shady. And the author counter balances that viewpoint with quotes from other teammates who say Tejada is a stand up guy.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said, I think you’re reading the authors’ statements about there being “NO FACTS” as you so kindly put it in bold, a little too literally. The overall feel of the article, as I’ve said previously is evidenced by the reaction on this thread, is that Tejada is a cheater. But, also like I’ve said before, I guess you are just too intelligent to be duped like the rest of us.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the overall feel of the article, as I’ve said previously is evidenced by the reaction on this thread, is that Tejada is a cheater.
Oh well, that’s a shame. I’m in the minority then.
But, also like I’ve said before, I guess you are just too intelligent to be duped like the rest of us.
I have a different interpretation. I don’t see it as being the “right” interpretation. You’re the one who keeps placing these condescending value labels (“I guess you are just too intelligent to be duped like the rest of us”, um thanks). I like to stick the facts and avoid that crap.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you like to stick to the facts – I like to read articles about facts. Enough said.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and you have read an article with facts.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I read an article with a fact in it, but it wasn’t about facts.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah yes, the linguistic gymnastics. The Brazilian judge says, “10!”
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just like an article that quotes players by names is different from one that quotes them anonymously, an article being about facts and one that’s about he-said-she-said are pretty different.
by O'sFan21 on Sep 1, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ALL articles have elements of he said, she said, to quote you, “it’s about a meeting that took place because somebody thought something and told somebody about it and then a reporter found out 8 years later…” That’s almost every article in journalism.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
by O'sFan21 on Sep 3, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
And Tejada confirmed that the meeting took place. Again I have no issue with the story about the meeting. I have an issue with the article painting Tejada as a cheater who helps his friends on opposing teams. That’s where the rumor and innuendo comes in and Tejada very much does NOT confirm that.
Just to clarify – if they framed the article as just being about this single meeting 8 years ago that would be fine. But they didn’t do that.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have an issue with the article painting Tejada as a cheater who helps his friends on opposing teams.
The author goes out his way to say that there is no definitive proof.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
but did you not walk away from the article thinking that’s what the point was?
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO!!!! That’s why I quoted the numerous quotes below!
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the author goes OUT OF HIS WAY in saying there's no definitive proof
No hard evidence has ever been produced, and to this day Tejada, now an All-Star with the Houston Astros, denies his teammates’ accusations, which have only recently been uncovered.
Hudson called Tejada, a six-time All-Star, "a great teammate" and said he still found it impossible to believe that he would help the opposition.
"It’s impossible to prove something like that," he said. "So it’s not worth commenting on."
"Miggy was telling guys there was no way he would be doing it," Damon said. "I think what we concluded was that the hitters were seeing him move on certain pitches.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right but what did you walk away from the article thinking?
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I walked away thinking that some of his teammates thought Tejada was shady, nothing more, nothing less.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're a smarter man than most then.
Read the gamethread – it’s obvious that most people walked away thinking that he was a cheater.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that’s too bad. Oh well, shit happens.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup. When you write an article like that it does indeed.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the author can’t help it if people misread his article when he goes OUT OF HIS WAY to prevent a particular misreading.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure he can.
By not titling it: "Friendship or Betrayal From Inside the Lines? " lol
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Friendship or Betrayal From Inside the Lines? "
To repeat, Friendship OR Betrayal, the author leaves it up to you. The authors babies the reader for the love of god and people still misread it! I have no sympathy for them.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
I’m sorry, but now you’re coming off as incredibly naive. That headline may as well be on a tabloid.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
heaven forbid a reporter presents a series of corroborated events while carefully qualifying any claims and then it leaves it up to reader to make up his or her mind.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol and that headline doesn’t imply ANYTHING…
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it implies TWO things, friendship or betrayal…. seems pretty clear to me.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha ok. I think it’s PAINFULLY obvious what the implications of the headline is, but apparently you read everything 100% literally.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, I don’t read everything 100% literally, actually, if you read carefully what I’ve said it’s painfully obvious that you can’t read subtlety and nuance that the reporter is trying to convey.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then you’re right! The headline isn’t supposed to mean anything other than a totally balanced story with no implications about the player in question at all!
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The reporter leaves you to decide what the implications are…. he gives you the “facts” and let’s you decide if you believe Tejada is a cheater or not. He just gives some “facts” and then he even goes out of his to way to say that one particular conclusion (Tejada is a cheater) isn’t support by hard evidence. I like it how the reporter treats the reader with intelligence, but that’s just me.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what a shame then.
and i’m not buying it. i think the reading public is smarter than you portray.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read the thread.
We all must be a bunch of morons.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
birdman ducks
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
How much do you love using the quote function??? Give it a rest I read the article. We obviously disagree.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but you made a claim (i.e., the author painted Tejada as a cheater) that simply wasn’t true. It’s more much nuanced than that… as I’ve already said above.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also I don't really view Frank Menechino as a valid source
Dude’s a walking steroid.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just because Frank M took some steroids doesn’t impair his integrity regarding the retelling of events.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Aug 31, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly. I just don’t find him to be a very convincing person.
by O'sFan21 on Aug 31, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you two get a room.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Sep 1, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what she said.
Birdman is too sexy for this website.
by birdman on Sep 1, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 













