Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

Wednesday Bird Droppings

Cardinals give Hill non-roster invitation - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
Rich Hill and his old time delivery are headed to St. Louis as he signed a minor league deal with an invite to spring training. -Stacey

Rockies monitor utility market, with Melvin Mora high on list
Melmo is on the Rockies' radar as a bench player who can fill in at third base as well as perhaps second and outfield. -Stacey

International League announces Hall of Fame inductees
The 2010 Int'l League HoF class includes former Orioles Bobby Grich and Don Baylor. Did you know they were back-to-back MVPs of the International League while playing for the Rochester Redwings in 1970-1971? Neither did I. -Stacey

Sarasota County to vote on Ed Smith Stadium renovation -- again | HeraldTribune.com
Another hearing is scheduled to vote on the proposed renovation of Ed Smith Stadium for the Orioles. There really is a lot of rigmarole going on regarding the O's new home, isn't there? -Stacey

Tejada is the main man
As has been mentioned, MacPhail says that Tejada is the man for 3B and wasn't signed "for a few months." More interesting to me is the blurb at the bottom where MacPhail says he is done with position players. Not that I can imagine who else he'd pick up, but at least we know. -Stacey

Paronto signs minor-league deal with Red Sox - Berkshire Eagle Online
Who knew Chad Paronto was still kicking around the minor leagues? Next you'll tell me Chris Richard is still playing! What's that? Oh... -Stacey

Leaders that go the Distance - Salem-News.Com
For reasons that I can't quite ascertain, Doug Dickerson of the Salem News is using Cal Ripken's consecutive games streak to challenge people to pursue their passion. I don't know, man, I just gather the news links. -Stacey

J.R. House eyes his next opportunity - Charleston Daily Mail
Remember when people were so excited about J.R. House? That was weird. -Stacey

Get to know Phil Wrye, Assistant GM to the Baysox
Wrye should you get to know him? Wrye not? -Stacey

Second Opinion: Yankee fan: O's fans way too rude
This is almost a year old and I just stumbled upon it by accident, but it's such a hoot that I thought I'd share with all of you. Enjoy! -Stacey

Andy MacPhail on Luke Scott - MASNSports.com
"He is the streakiest hitter I've ever been around in my life. There was a three-month stretch where he absolutely carried us. As our guys say, it doesn't matter who is on the mound, when he is going good he can hit anybody." -duck

Hall of Famer Palmer cuts McGwire some slack - Newsday.com
"I think, considering the era, it was a tough decision," Palmer said. Rest of the article is behind a pay wall, but interesting tidbit nonetheless. -duck

Lots of hot stove action as we get closer to Spring Training: the Cubs signed Xavier Nady to a one year, $3.3M deal, plus incentives; Ronnie Belliard re-upped with the Dodgers; the Padres invited 42 year old Matt Stairs to spring training; my favorite designated hitter, Jim Thome, is going to back to the AL Central with the Twins; Jon Garland and the Padres agreed to a 1 year, $4.7M contract; and Ben Sheets is finally off the market as he signed with the A's for $10M plus incentives. 

AND IN OTHER NEWS...

Read Street: Previews of the Apple tablet - baltimoresun.com
"We're just hours away from the introduction of the Apple tablet, a product that will revolutionize e-readers, save newspapers, rebuild Haiti and return the Baltimore Orioles to the World Series. Or something like that." -duck

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the Open Thread. You know what that makes you? Lollygaggers!

Comment 217 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

1970s Rochester

If you pull up the rosters for any of those old Red Wings teams, it’ll make you sick to see how much talent they had. One of the reasons the O’s traded Frank Robinson to the Dodgers in 1972 was that he was blocking Don Baylor. There was a pitcher named Mike Willis who went 9-4, 2.64 ERA in 1974…and returned to Rochester the next year. He went 14-8, 2.57 in 1975…and returned to Rochester again in 1976. The Blue Jays claimed him in the expansion draft, but he never did pan out.

Also, do yourself a favor and read the comments posted to that Yankee fan letter. Some funny stuff there.

"The United States is the New York Yankees of countries...powerful and respected until the year 2000." - Homer J. Simpson

by Brotz13 on Jan 27, 2010 7:42 AM EST reply actions  

I read some of those comments

Especially the one from the New Yorker stationed in Baltimore. Wow. Where do New Yorkers get the hubris?

It’s funny though, I don’t live far from the city, and have a few friends that live there. Even so, they still complain about the tiniest ‘inconvenience’, and act like it’s only in NYC that they have to deal with it, no where else can it ever be nearly as difficult.

"Real Orioles don't pout. Real Orioles don't gloat. Real Orioles just win."

by NewYorkOriole on Jan 27, 2010 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Did You Know? The successful and productive Rochester Red Wings are no longer the O's AAA franchise because

Peter Angelos is a douchebag. ‘Course, that’s the reason for a lot of things.

Rockies: Plus, you get a baserunning coach and strategic bunting instructor!

Third Opinion: Dear Barbara C. Nickerson: Does the word ‘irony’ mean anything to you? No? OK, it means throwing batteries at opposing players and shouting obscenities at out of town visitors all game long at Yerkee Stadium. Put otherwise: blow it out your shorts.

Oh, and be sure to visit Fenway!

"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Churchill,1942-- a rebuilding year.

by Titov on Jan 27, 2010 8:11 AM EST reply actions  

I thought

the battery throwing was at the Vet in Philly…at JD Drew.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

They're amateurs

The New York Yankees today announced that Gerard Monagle, a long-time fan from New Jersey, will throw out the first "D" battery at the team’s home opener April 16th against the Cleveland Indians.

"This is a dream come true," said Monagle, a long-time season ticket holder. "I saw all the greats—Dwight Evans of the Red Sox, Claudell Washington of the White Sox—get pelted by fans in right field. I’m just proud to carry on a great tradition."

A "D" battery is a cylindrical electrochemical cell used to power portable devices such as flashlights and "boom boxes", and as a projectile to injure outfielders on visiting teams by New York Yankee fans. It is considered more effective than C, AA and AAA batteries, which are less capable of causing blunt trauma to the head.

http://www.sportsonastick.org/sportsonastick/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=291:yankees-pick-old-timer&catid=43:mlb&Itemid=111

"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Churchill,1942-- a rebuilding year.

by Titov on Jan 28, 2010 7:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm really curious to see how steve jobs convinces me i need a tablet

I’m sure he’s going to, but at the moment i’m not excited about it.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

I know right?

But I already have a Mac. They’re expensive so I doubt my parents will buy me another one until I go off to college.

I’m glad they finally came out with a tablet. ALL HAIL STEVE JOBS!!!!!

by DCO'sfan on Jan 27, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

As long as my Kindle doesn't spontaneously ignite in flames

I think it’ll be a cool piece of tech that’ll be prohibitively expensive to everyone except silicon valley hipsters.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd be willing to bet

my mom already has one on pre-order.

by Steve. on Jan 27, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I'm talking to Comcast, then MLB Network, and then the FCC today

about how MLB Network rarely uses closed captioning. They are breaking the law, people!

The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST

by the fix is in on Jan 27, 2010 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

Good for you

You are your own best advocate. And as the parent of a kid with vision difficulties, I’m with ya, fix.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Yankees fans...

I dont know if I ever told this story, but that link up there reminded me.

I was at the game this past year at new yankee stadium when Jeter got the hit to become the all time yankee’s hit leader. I stood up and took in the hilarity of it all (the insanely overblown celebration over a guy’s 2,722nd career hit, people jumping up and down and hugging in the stands, and play stopping for 5-10 minutes). Then a guy passes my gf and I (we were wearing O’s stuff) in our row and says something like “you guys have to be enjoying this at least a a bit, right?”, to which I replied" Ummm… not really". The guy was blown away and immediately wanted a fight. “If this was an Orioles all time record you’d think it was a huge deal!”. I went on to tell him that if it was the Orioles all time hits record, it would be at least over 3,000 hits and that somewhere around 50 people have more hits than Jeter. I also mentioned I dont get all that excited by team records (especially meager ones).

I guess it doesnt really lend itself to their fans being rude, but it definitely lends itself to them being pompous, self- centered asses.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

ding-ding-ding

Remember, these are Knicks fans who aren’t house-broken.

"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Churchill,1942-- a rebuilding year.

by Titov on Jan 27, 2010 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Knicks fans?

Are you kidding? They’re all Lakers fans!

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Hah, they're not even majority Knicks fans, apparently

They’re Nets fans. How pathetic is THAT?!?

http://forums.nyyfans.com/showthread.php?t=35901

’Course, that would explain a few things…

"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Churchill,1942-- a rebuilding year.

by Titov on Jan 28, 2010 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Out of a polling of 38 people...

Yankees fans are overwhelmingly Knicks fans (the ones that still follow basketball at least, which isn’t many of them).

by daveh873 on Jan 28, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

You should have said

Yeah, I’m enjoying it because the Orioles are winning.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Or because

Jeter is now only x hits away from the great Harold Baines!

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

what are you talking about?

jeTeR is THe bESt pLAyeR eVER! gO yaNkEEs

by twistedlogic on Jan 27, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

We LoVe CoOkInG tOo!!

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I definitely would have

but we were losing at that point. Then there was a delay, so we left NY and came home just in time to watch the rest of the game and the beauty of the O’s ruining a ton of Yankee’s fans days.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

ah

you know I wondered that after I hit post. I can’t really remember too much about that game other than the total ridiculousness in regards to the game.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

It was amazingly over the top

i’m glad I was there to witness it though. And by “it” I mean the total lack of perspective and idiocy of Yankees fans and their organization.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasn't that the game where Jeter gave a press conference while it was still going on?

And the game ended at like midnight when there was an afternoon game the next day? Girardi took out all his starters and sent them home. Talk about home field advantage.

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Jan 27, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Palmer...

It’s nice to see someone from that era not be entirely sanctimonious about steroid use. Many of the old-timers who complain about it today were popping beanies like vitamin pills back then and would have been using roids in a second if they thought it gave them an edge.

"If you know how to cheat, start now." - Earl Weaver

by rebop on Jan 27, 2010 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

His quote is logical. I wonder what he thinks about the horseshit “apology” though…

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

horseshit is right

he’s just trying to clear his name so he can make that hall.

by twistedlogic on Jan 27, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

miggi will wear #9

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 12:57 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Will he live up to ZAUN?

The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST

by the fix is in on Jan 27, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

is he now MIGGI?

do we have to kneel before him?

"If they pitch to you, make them pay."

--Diamond Dave to the Phenom

by j.q. higgins on Jan 27, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It **IS** the Second Coming of Miggi...

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

was he followed into by four horsemen?

or at least four, errrr, uh, vitamin salesmen?

"If they pitch to you, make them pay."

--Diamond Dave to the Phenom

by j.q. higgins on Jan 27, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

9 will always be Brady to me

I don’t like Miggi wearing it. I know other have worn it since, but no one very prominent (sorry ZAUN).

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Since Brady left

It’s been the designated number for scrub backup catchers it seems. I was kinda hoping he’d take 6.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Players to wear 9 since Brady

Thanks to Brotz’s website

Luis Garcia OF (Apr-May 2002)
Luis Lopez IF (June 18-Oct 1, 2002) Also wore 26
Geronimo Gil C (2003; Sept 2004-2005) Also wore 17, 60
Ken Huckaby C (July 6-Aug 16, 2004)
Raul Chavez C (Apr-May 2006) Also wore 36
Danny Ardoin C (Aug 30-Sept 8, 2006)
Paul Bako C (2007)
Scott Moore IF (Mar 31-Apr 11, 2008) Also wore 43
Gregg Zaun C (Apr 6-Aug 7, 2009) Also wore 24
Michael Aubrey 1B (Aug 18, 2009-)

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ugh, I remember Gil.

Don't give up, don't ever give up. - Jim Valvano

by BaltimoreSportsFan on Jan 27, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember thinking he was part of the O's young revival ...

.. shows how easy it was to delude myself.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

Yeah I thought he might actually be good.

Does anybody remember what he sounded like giving interviews? Hilarious.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

The Geronimo Gil claim to fame

In my eyes, his best moment was in a commercial. They were doing these goofy commercials for giveaway nights where players and coaches were giving stuff to one another. My favorite came at the end of one, where Dempsey walked up to Gil and handed him a lawn flamingo.

“Geronimo, I want you to have this,” said the Demper.

The camera stayed on Gil, who replied, “Dan’ you berry mah, Rick.” He then sized up his new prize, looking pleased. I still laugh my ass off.

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Jan 27, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought Gil was going to be decent. We got him for Mike Trombley from the Dodgers if I remember correctly. I think that was one of the few decent trades by Syd Thift.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 27, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I remembered 5 of those wore #9

Thats pretty sad on my part. The ones I remembered were Aubrey, ZAUN, Moore, Bako, and Gil.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

An open question I asked elsewhere about Tejada

I read somewhere yesterday (not sure where) that Tejada got $6 million and a no-trade agreement. Anyone know if he got a no-trade agreement? Doesn’t sound like a good thing to me. IF Bell is ready in July and Tejada draws interest from someone, I would like to be able to peddle his ass out of town for a prospect. Maybe it’s just me, but didn’t we just go through this last year with Mora?

by fuddnelson on Jan 27, 2010 1:20 PM EST reply actions  

Agree

I’m following the endgadget liveblog (which just died on me), and it looks really nice, but I don’t know. It’s basically a huge iPod touch, which is cool for web browsing and watching movies. Ten hour battery life is nice. But if I’m reading a book, my Kindle DX has a 14-day battery life. Will the iPad have a special stylus and software that will allow me to annotate or write notes on the sides of things lie books and documents, etc? I just don’t see any productivity features so far. As a media device, it looks real nice. But I’m not really in the market for something like this.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

ahh, but...

…if you didn’t have a kindle yet, would you buy one, or would you buy an iPad?

because i think that’s the market they’re after. all the would-be kindle buyers for this year.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends a lot on what the price is.

But a tablet’s been sorta Apple’s holy grail for a long time. I’m very surprised if they let this out the door without something really revolutionary.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

That's gotta be coming

But when it’s all said and done, it’s still a brightly back-lit LCD screen. I don’t like reading books on screens.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Still don't understand the appeal of a Kindle

I use eReader on my iPhone, and on a Palm before that. I mean, electronic books have been out for almost a decade. Why in teh world would I want something as big as a Kindle for something I can do on my phone?

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

It's the experience!

Eye fatigue and all that. I look at a screen for eight hours a day at work, and then several more hours recreationally. When it’s time to read, I don’t want to do it on a screen.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I get why some people don't want one at all

I just can’t understand people who spend $300 bucks on something that big to do something I can do on my phone for free.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Again

Phone is back-lit lcd screen, and a tiny one at that. That would make me hate reading.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll put up with it for $300

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

And the ability to put it in my pocket

I know….

Okay

I can be kinda weird in my reasoning when it comes to tech purchases. Or anything else for that matter.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Kindle for iPhone, and whatever other eReaders are out there

They’re just not for me. Maybe the problem is me. I’m just enamored with outdated technology :/

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm still wondering why someone wants electronic books.

The old fashioned hard copy still seems to do the job sufficiently well.

(And you can stick the paperback versions in your pocket.)

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

1) ability to carry many books in a single device. I read multiple books at a time and want to be able to read whatever book I’m in the mood to read. Right now I’m halfway through about a dozen books.

2) electronic delivery – buy a book and you can start reading in seconds. Kindle and iPad and nook and the new Sony one all allow you to shop directly from the device. It’s great.

3) I can only speak to the Kindle DX, but it’s feels great in the hand, not too heavy, and I never have to worry about keeping a finger between the pages so they won’t flip shut. It’s just a very comfortable way to read without worrying about anything except maybe spilling coffee on it, but that’s the same as with paper.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Saving SPACE baby!

And organization. Plus as someone who has to read academic journal articles regularly, the ability to save these articles and organize them is very appealing.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 27, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

not to mention search them quickly.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Kos was yammering away a while back

about how he’s all into Kindle because he’s not into “dead trees”. Uh huh. So I suppose there will be NO paper versions of his books at all, yes?

Now he’s not too bad on the issues and he’s very good on strategy (he knew Obama shutting out Dean in favour of Emanual was a mistake long before anyone else did).

But on the Schilling Scale of Self Righteousness he’s about an 8.5 of 10.

You can't fix stupid. Stupid is forever.

by sluggo 2.0 on Jan 27, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

There are no shortages of trees.

At least not for paper pulp.

Of course there are no shortages of polar bears either, but people are forking over money in the belief there is.

And remember the hole in the ozone that everyone was so worried about a few years ago? The one which allowed an increase in solar radiation (primarily uv) equivilent to the increase a person would expereince moving from Minneapolis to New Orleans. I just heard yesterday from someone who aid they heard a report that it may now provide certain benefits. Must be like salt – it’s good. No it isn’t. Wait, it isn’t all that bad. In fact it is pretty good. Uh, wait a minute, it’s now bad again.

(My apologies for the off topic rambling.)

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

dude...

do you really believe this????

On the other hand, the fact that you “heard from someone who said they heard a report” is awfully convincing….

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

(goes to pop the popcorn)

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Are you back yet?

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Some and responsible are the key words there.

As far as you being skeptical about the rest of it, I just hope you read the evidence that’s out there and don’t just go based on headlines, rumors, and reports that somebody may or may not have heard of or actually read.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Any discussion on logging first requires one ...

… to establish the boundries on what is being discussed.

Is the topic maintenance of species and habitat? Is it sustainable harvesting? Are we talking about impacts to watersheds (erosion & landslides, water quality, etc)?

If the subject is simply there not being enough trees to harvest, the answer is not true. It is particularly not true when it comes to providing pulpwood for paper mills.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

that’s true. If your point was simply that we aren’t going to run out of trees I guess that’s true. That’s an awfully simplistic approach though.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Really believe what?

That there are no shortage of trees?

That there are no shortages of polar bears?

That the threat posed by the ozone hole was greatly overblown?

Yes to all three. I live in the Pacific NW and there is no shortage of trees available. They have been planting more acreage than they harvest for some time now.

I also looked into the diminishing polar bear population issue. All one has to do is check out the same research studies organizations like WWF reference to see that claims for the polar bear to go extinct are greatly over stated. (The first thing researchers say is that they don’t really know how many polar bears there are and that they can only present data on those populations they do know about.)

As for the ozone hole, when was the last time you saw anyone talking about what an ecological diasater it is? (Plus I took both Atmospheric Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry in grad school and probably have an understanding of the subject that’s at least slightly better than the average person and almost certainly better than most journalists you will run into.)

Have you ever asked yourself why so many things are presented to us as a “crisis”.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok...I'm trying to stay calm...

The fact that YOU live in a place where there is not shortage of trees available (at the moment) is NOT an indication that there is no global shortage of trees or that no damage is being done by excessive logging.

As far as polar bears, not sure what more evidence you were looking for because that’s how populations are studied. It’s a generally accepted statistical method to study observable portions of a broader population and make educated guesses about what the trends within that benchmark population tell you about what’s happening to the broader population.

As far as the ozone, I know next to nothing about it except that many people who know a hell of a lot more about it than me seem to think that there was/is enough of a problem to change the products that we use in our daily lives, so I’m inclined to believe them. And perhaps the reason that it hasn’t been mentioned as much recently is that there are much more pressing environmental problems?

I don’t know what your definition of crisis is or what has been presented to us as a crisis that isn’t a crisis.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice that you are trying ... to stay calm that is.

To begin with, my original comment was in reference to books and printed material (i.e. paper products) and the concept of not wanting to kill trees. There is no shortage of harvestable trees in this country for that purpose. This is with current practices and regulations in effect. (The US Forest Service is leading the way in many instances on the development of sustainable havest practices and the majority of timber companies are both privately owned and and cut on property they own – meaning they are highly incented toward adopting sustainable practices.

Nowhere did I say anything about deforestation. The entire world could move to a paperless society tomorrow and it would have almost zero impact on deforestation.

Regarding the polar bears – we can move past the fact that they don’t know how many there are and address your point. Have you looked at the results of the research data? I’ll have to go find the link again, but here is what the scientists own data reported – a percentage of the population groups that they new about appeared to be experiencing a decline in numbers. Another percentage appeared to have no change. And a third percentage appeared to be increasing in numbers. I’ll come back and post the link, but I believe the percentages were about 20% in decline, 20% expanding and 50% with no change. Call me retarded – strike that, as some people don’t like the term – call me scientifically challenged, but I have a hard time concluding that the planet is going to be short on polar bears anytime soon from those numbers.

On ozone – I’m probably one of those people who know more about it than you do, yet I don’t think it is quite the problem it was made out to be. It is entirely possible that one of the reasons most governments pushed for banning CFC’s was because they were led to believe it was in fact a crisis. I will point out that the move to ban them didn’t pick up momentum until some of the big chemical companies found replacement products. Take from that what you will.

Out of curiousity, do you happen to know where the hole is? I’ll tell you that it did not turn up where all the scientists predicted. They also couldn’t explain why it showed up where it did, once they found it. (That part may no longer be applicable. It’s been a few years since I paid close attention to the science.)

One probably unintended benefit from banning CFC’s is their impact as a greenhouse gas. At the time few people were concerned about that aspect of the compounds. Then, as now, everyone was focused on CO2 and to a slightly lesser extent methane. CFC’s were seen primarily in relation to their ozone destroying effect. However there is good reason to believe that CFC’s are far more important with regard to their impact on global warmning than CO2.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed that you weren’t talking about the other impacts of deforestation, but I think that’s a pretty simple way of looking at it.

As far as the polar bears I’ve never seen the study that you’re talking about or read anything convincing that the threat to their species is not significant.

What difference does it make where the hole is as long as it’s there and it’s causing the problems they thought it was (again I’ve read nothing to indicate otherwise, but would be happy to do so)?

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I think deforestation in certain parts of the world ...

… is a very serious issue. I’ll even agree that the impacts extend beyond the areas where it is occuring. That just wasn’t the topic being discussed.

I’ll find a link to the polar bear study for you.

Where something occurs can make a huge difference or none at all. In this case it is occuring over Antartica. With the exception of a few scientists and a bunch of penguins, I don’t believe it is effecting anyone. As for problems it is causing – it is rather difficult to prove a negative. I’m saying that it isn’t causing significant problem. If you believe otherwise, then express what problems you think are being caused. One will do.

To bring this back to the start – you gave the impression in your opening comment that anyone who believed as I did one these three topics had to be either ignorant or naive. I don’t believe you have shown that either applies.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll check out the polar bear study when you send it, but after some google searching just now I didn’t find anything remotely convincing (including a Fox News piece of all sources of journalism confirming the threat to polar bears and other species – color me shocked) to debunk the threat to polar bears.

Again I’m not up to speed on the ozone hole, but isn’t the thought that it being over antarctica will result in ice melting which causes a whole host of problems (water levels rising, loss of fresh water sources, changing of ecosystems, threats to species that live and hunt on the ice, threats of species expanding that are currently controlled by species that live on the ice, etc) associated with that?

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm quickly getting to the point where I'm

exhausting my knowledge level without going back and pulling my text book and notes off the shelf, but as I remember, the primary impact of a reduced concentration in ozone levels at high altitudes is increased ultra violet radiation exposure. The biggest concern was increases in skin cancer. I do not believe higher uv levels at surface level have any effect on temperature.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah I could be wrong here – as I said I have no clue about most of the actual science here, but I assumed that the hole allowed more heat (from the sun) into the atmosphere. Although to be perfectly honest I would be a little confused why the hole wouldn’t also help release some of the carbon and resulting heat…

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm going to have to look for the story I referred to in passing earlier.

I’m curious about how it could be working as a positive effect. Specifically, what mechanism they think is at work.

Speaking of mechanisms, next time someone brings up the subject of climate change, as them to explain the mechanism at work which makes a compound a greenhouse gas. If you don’t hear anything about incidence (or maybe spectrum or bandwidth), then there is a good chance the individual doesn’t know the science.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

No

I had to TA an entire unit on this crap for two semesters, which I hated and consequently forget most of the specifics. But:

Ozone molecules scatter UV rays. UV rays hit the stratospheric ozone (O3) and crack it into O2 and O, and then the O is free to form into O2 with another stray O, or back into O3 with another O2.

All I had to do was hit up google to get a quick refresher. Can’t you do a little research before you pop off and argue about stuff you know nothing about?

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

English please.

And I freely admitted I didn’t know shit about this, so calm down.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 12:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Everyone's calm

A little rigor would help you avoid putting your foot in your mouth, or at the very least would help to inform your opinions so that you’d be able to hold an actual conversation.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Dude

Keep with the personal attacks, but read where I said I didn’t know the science. We were having a perfectly friendly discussion until you had to jump in with your “don’t pop off” and “put your foot in your mouth” bullshit. It was a friendly fucking discussion until you jumped in with your totally unnecessary personal attacks.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Personal attacks?

What are you talking about? Do you really find what I said offensive? I’m just genuinely confused as to why you mercilessly argue about subjects that you don’t even do the most cursory amount of research on. I said to you what someone would say to you if you broached the topic in an actual discussion and were similarly ill-prepared to discuss specifics.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

It's not that I find them offensive

I just find them totally unnecessary. We were having a normal discussion and then you come barging in telling me not to pop off and not to put my foot in my mouth. I freely admitted that I didn’t understand the science, so why come in attacking like that? Why not just share your knowledge in a non-confrontational manner and further the discussion? I’ve never ever been told in an “actual discussion” as you say “not to pop off”…

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

Since you indicated that you had to make an effort to keep yourself calm, maybe people are afraid of getting punched and don’t want to actually share their thoughts and opinions and have an actual conversation. Or maybe you only talk to like-minded folks and have never been confronted with someone who thinks differently. Do you understand how confrontational your own comments are?

dude…
do you really believe this????

Instead of saying “I disagree and here’s why source source source,” you basically roll your eyes and laugh. So forgive me if I don’t feel too bad for calling ’em like I see ’em sometimes.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I indicated that I had to keep myself calm and then actually kept calm! And sure I asked if he actually believed that…and then we had a discussion about it! No idea what you’re talking about getting punched.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm going to sleep.

And I’ve had a bit to drink so apologies if I was snappy, but I really get annoyed when random people who weren’t part of the conversation (and so have no reason to be pissed) just chime in and attack one side or the other. Like I said, I freely I admitted that I didn’t know shit about the topic that you attacked me for, so you could have just shared what you knew.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

everyone's a part of the conversation

I think of Camden Chat like a giant room. Everyone is seated, facing each other, and everyone can hear everything that is said. Some people talk, some respond, but always everyone is listening and has the ability to chime in when they feel it is appropriate to do so. And I did share what I knew (ie what I could remember that could be substantiated by the google). No one is pissed – I was just curious why you would enter an argument completely disarmed, and I’m even further surprised at your reaction to being called on it. I guess I added the snark to ensure a reply, I don’t know. I guess I should apologize for that. But then again, since it was ground that you tread on consistently, I didn’t think you’d be that offended by it.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 1:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure everyone's part of the broader conversation

but you were not involved in this so I don’t see why you had to react so angrily (if you weren’t angry you sure seemed angry). And I didn’t enter an argument about the ozone layer, so obviously I didn’t enter an argument “so unprepared.” It was a discussion that evolved into talking about the hole in the ozone layer and as I’ve said probably 20 times already I freely admitted that I didn’t know about the science.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't angry

Sorry if you thought so. When did you enter the conversation? Did you start the thread? Did you know that this entire thread evolved from a series of exchanges between kba and myself? These are all responses to a comment I made way up there.

You entered the conversation when you read something you disagreed with. I re-entered the conversation when I felt I could both add substance to the topic at hand, as well as take issue with the way it was being discussed. You do not get to choose who discusses something with you – anyone can hit the reply button.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 1:38 AM EST up reply actions  

The discussion I entered

was NOT about the topic that you attacked me for not knowing about. It was about polar bears and deforestation.

I don’t give a shit who discusses what with who, but I didn’t see any reason for you enter (or re-enter) the discussion so angrily.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Again, not angry

and again, apologies. But trust that I will continue to enter any and all conversations that interest me, regardless of who is participating. And your understanding of my reasons is not required.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 1:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn't ask for reasons

just asked for you to tone it down a little bit.

And also I asked for you to fucking say it in english since I don’t speak science.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Okay

Noted. I’ll genuinely attempt to approach comments in the future without being snarky.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 1:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Eh

whatever snarky is fine. Maybe I was just got my panties in a bunch for no reason.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 1:59 AM EST up reply actions  

TMI

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 28, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless we see the photos ...

… we don’t believe it.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 28, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

But then again, since it was ground that you tread on consistently, I didn’t think you’d be that offended by it.

hehe.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 28, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

hehe.

but you never look for arguments with me…

by O'sFan21 on Jan 28, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

ePub - great

This is a very good thing. Amazon will have to rethink their proprietary format now.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Based on what I've seen so far

(and this is assuming they will still announce some sort of itunes-type book store later today)

I would still buy a Kindle (or ask for one as a gift, like I did with the Kindle). I am a reader – I’m one of those people who has a stack of twenty unread books in a pile next to my bed. Now I have most of them on my kindle (still unread).

I’m also somewhat of a bilbiophile – I like the look and feel of books. The look of paper is replicated on the Kindle satisfactorily – no backlight, no screen glare (or very little), and now with the ability to change font and easily look up definitions of words.

The Apple Tablet looks like a nice media device, but my Kindle is for books and books only. And I like it that way.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

That's the thing with me

I really, really like books. Like, hold in my hand, feel the pages, books. I don’t like letting books pile up around my house. If it’s a book I love it goes on the bookshelf, otherwise it gets donated to the Baltimore Book Thing, but I just love books. I’ve considered getting a Kindle but have held off because I’m afraid I’ll miss books too much.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I like books too.

but on a public transportation commute, I love the idea of having a couple of different books, and the latest New Yorker, and the NY Times, and the Complete Works of William Shakespeare in my bag at all times, but weighing next to nothing. I’d still keep real books on my bedside table though.

Currently reading: Agincourt by Bernard Cornwell. I’m a sucker for well-written historical fiction.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The first book I read on my Kindle

Was Sharpe’s Rifles, followed by Sharpe’s Eagle. I’m halfway through Sharpe’s Gold, but it’s gotten a little slow and I’ve started reading other stuff. Right now, I’m reading “No.1 Ladies Detective Agency” and “Nelson’s Trafalgar,” which is an awesomely written narrative of not only the battle, but what life was like for the respective navies and citizens of that time period as a whole. It’s just awesome.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I get the convenience factor for sure

I’m just hesitant about it. Clinging to what I know, I suppose.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I, like Stacy am a book lover.

But you make a good point. E-devices do present options one may not easily have otherwise.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Quality author

Haven’t read that one yet, but I’ve just started The Burning Land, book 5 of Cornwell’s Saxon series, set in the time of Alfred the Great.

You can't fix stupid. Stupid is forever.

by sluggo 2.0 on Jan 27, 2010 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I use eReader for the iPhone

and have been able to put books I bought for my Palm five years ago on it. I’ve got the entire NIV Bible, a quotes compilation to use at school, “Truman”, which I am currently reading, and a few others. All on my phone. Not something that needs to go in a bag, but my pocket. I know the screen size if small, but the convenience factor more than makes up for it.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Since we are on what we are currently reading ...

I’m a more than half way through “At Dawn We Slept”. Can’t explain why a UofM history grad is only getting to this one at this late date.

I am almost finished with a Harry Turtledove story “The United States of Atlantis”. I’m hooked on alternative history.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

About piles of books

I’m somewhat of a hoarder, because I don’t like to give away books on the off chance I’ll either want to re-read them or look up a specific passage later on. But now that I have a Kindle, I think I could easily unload most of my books (not all of them, since some are not available on the Kindle yet). I think you’ve inspired me to look seriously into donating my books, maybe as soon as this weekend.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm at a point

where I’m trying to keep myself from hoarding books. I mean, it’s totally irrational, how many times am I going to reread The Once and Future King? But yet, I’m completely unwilling to move it from my bookshelf.

I’m pretty sure I’d be happy enough with a library card and maybe a dozen owned books, just because those are my absolute favorites…but I just can’t bring myself to get rid of them. It’s terrible. I’m running out of room because of all the books, dvds, and video games I’ve hoarded.

But I’m not switching to the kindle, and I’ll probably keep on buying dvds like mad, too. I just like the way a full bookshelf looks. I need help.

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't even have a proper bookshelf

which I’m kind of glad for, because I definitely wouldn’t give away any books if I had a nice bookshelf. I’d want to keep a collection that intimately defined me as a person, and that anyone who would walk in to my house and looked at my bookshelf would be able to see what kind of person I was just by the books I read. So I totally understand your desire to keep all your books and movies.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Hoarding books? So that's what they call what I do.

I have a hard time parting with any book. Including text books.

On the other hand, I am re-readiing a lot of them. My wife has me on a budget. One result is a curtailment in the number of new (and used) books I’m buying. I’m managing that by going back through my shelves. One drawback is my memory. I tend to remember stories long after I’ve finished them.

Another result is my wine cellar is diminishing rapidly. My wife doesn’t understand that you have to continually replenish it. She keeps telling me that I shouldn’t be spending money on wine when I have several cases worth downstairs.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

steve jobs needs to invent “self replenishing wine” next.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

i like the idea of passing books on.

letting them be of use to more than one person. and i also love it when people pass books on to me.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too

I donate books but I also love reading a book, thinking of someone that I know would love it, and giving it to them.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

the screen caps of book reading look great

not overly bright. not too different from reading an actual page.

i can see how this thing would take off. much lighter than a laptop, you can take it anywhere. i wonder how they’re going to price it.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:13 PM EST reply actions  

As an entertainment/internet/media appliance

It really looks great. The eBook software and interface also looks really nice, and will be great for those who don’t mind reading books on their pc or iphone. The rest (ie games, iWork, etc) seem disappointing to me, because I’m not sure who would want to do any sort of major work on this thing. I guess I’ll have to try it to believe it, but I really think that the sans-stylus paradigm that apple is running with is a bit shortsighted, especially on something like this. What if I could just swipe from the left side to open notes and jot down shit as I read/browsed/worked, and then had those notes sync in the cloud and connected to other works? That just seems like a natural ability that a tablet should have. Kind of surprised that we’re moving forward into a world where this won’t happen. I guess if the keyboard works well enough, it’ll be moot, but I’ll have to try it out to believe it.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

i'd think there will be an app that lets you handwrite notes

given the touchscren capability. how hard could that be? i think there’s something similar for the iphone already.

no doubt that eventually there will be something like graffiti on the palm platform wehre you handwrite and it OCR’s it into a text file. plus, there’s stuff where you cna talk to it and it transcribes.

i agree that iWork is nothing to care about.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Write notes with your finger?

I know you can already do that on the iPhone, but I’m just trying to jot down fake notes on my desk here with my finger and I’m really not feeling it.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

i can't imagine it wuld be difficult to get used to with that much real estate

when the palm came out, there was a learning curve for graffiti, but it was pretty quick. i htink this would be similar.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

but then again, i hated always having to use the stylus for palm

eventually i got to the point where i used my finger for half the stuff. same thing when i do an ATM purchase at a supermarket. i always just use my finger.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Did graffiti actually catch on?

It’s a little before my time, but I can’t imagine using it today for anything other than a few words. Same with using my finger. Signing a name, jotting down a few words – finger is fine, I guess. But if we’re getting into sentences, using my finger would get old. Also, when I take notes, I like to draw little diagrams and sketches to help underscore important things or to solidify abstract concepts – I’ve been doing this with pen/pencil forever. I understand that what’s best for me isn’t best for everyone, but I don’t want to be doing that sort of thing with a finger.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

hmmm.

well then, not hard to see that someone will develop a stylus for this for folks like you. just maybe not apple.

i used graffiti when i wanted to get a note down quickly on my paml. i was able to graffiti much faster than i could type.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, they keep saying "isn't it AMAZING"?

it’s cool. i don’t know that it’s revolutionary.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Not just amazing, but magical.

leaning a little too heavy on that word throughout the presentation.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

magic is all around us. all you have to do is look.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

it's all an illusion!

"If they pitch to you, make them pay."

--Diamond Dave to the Phenom

by j.q. higgins on Jan 27, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Pricing seems a little high to me

Would certainly want a 3G model, and 16GB is not a lot of space. $729 or 829 in my mind is too much for what that does.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

1st gen

those prices will drop, just like the iphone

I think it’s a bit of a kindle-killer. the 9" kindle is $489, and this is $10 more? who would buy the 9" kindle after this?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

also,

we need a new site: iPadFacts.com

“the iPad will end world hunger.”

“the iPad gets 280 miles to the gallon.”

“the iPad stops NYC quarterbacks from being whiny cryababies.”

KIDDING, dave!

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 2:15 PM EST reply actions  

iPad will play 3B for the Orioles and no one will complain...

Sorry, I just had to bring it back to Miggi….

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

But can it hit?

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh-huh

I dunno if the “NYC” was an attempt at a 2 for 1 jab, but it was well played regardless. He’s a NJ QB, via NOLA and Ole Miss. He even lives in Hoboken. Nothing about him is NYC.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

sick of the apple hype

Apple makes great products. No doubt. But I can’t stand all of their hype. I almost bought a macbook pro but I decided to go with a Sony Vaio. So far so good, although I had some trouble turning it on (I couldn’t find the power button!).

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM EST reply actions  

I was messing around on

my Yankee-loving girlfriend’s gateway a bunch of months ago (since she’s gone all apple since then) and I kept pushing the gateway symbol to turn it on, because it looks just like the I/O universal power symbol. That annoyed the living shit out of me.

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I kept pushing the VAIO button to turn my notebook on! I called sony support and the support person told me the same thing. Then she did some looking around and told to me look on the side.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 27, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

It really is like a cult.

I thought the same way until bought one. And now i watch every new product announcement.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I just watch their gadgety announcements

The announcement for the original iPhone was an incredible experience that left me giddy, because it was unlike anything that anyone had ever seen or imagined could exist in January, 2007. That was around the time that Verizon was pushing the enV as a device that everyone was “envious” of, and then the iPhone comes along and just kills it. Destroys it.

I wish that the tablet had instilled the same sort of excitement within me. Not even close.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, i had much higher expectations

For as long as talk of a tablet has been swirling around Apple, i didnt think they would release something that wasnt really groundbreaking in at least some manner.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

the iphone

was truly kick ass. But I think the competition is catching up. I have a android phone and I think it’s on par with the iphone. The android app market is not as big as Apple but it’s still pretty damn good.

Vizzini: Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in Black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons.

by birdman on Jan 27, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, this is like the launch of Apple TV

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats the comparison i kept coming back to throughout the whole thing

I dont think it’ll be a total bust, but i could see it going the way of the apple tv, where they just ignore it and pretend it doesnt exist.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

oh i think there will be a market for it.

much more than for Apple TV.

But I don’t think it will be a new market. I think the iPad will cannibalize some of Apple’s laptop sales.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh most definitely

Why spend 1500 dollars when you can get iPad for 500? Especially if you can do a reasonable amount of spreadsheeting or coding or what-have-you on it?

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh

Spreadsheeting, on what exactly? Coding, on a touchscreen?

I really don’t get this device. It’s an giant iphone that’s not a phone. Who wants this, people who really want to be able to run iphone apps without an ATT contract? People who hate PCs and want to surf some of the web?

by CoachOfEarl on Jan 27, 2010 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

people who want really, really portable email/web/videos at a decent resolution

That said,

hahahahaha:

Frantic Steve Jobs Stays Up All Night Designing Apple Tablet

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That's awesome

but I still don’t get it. I guess the 3G is the thing, mobile access and all. But if I wanted a computer that couldn’t run flash, I’d install Slackware 6 on it.

WHODAT WHODAT WHODAT

by CoachOfEarl on Jan 27, 2010 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Most people laughed when this came out:

Nokia Booklet 3G

Because it’s $599 for a 120GB 3G-enabled netbook. But at $600, it’s cheaper than the 16GB 3G iPad and does a million things better. Put next to the iPad, the Booklet 3G looks like an incredible bargain.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

except it weighs nearly 3 pounds

and it runs Windows.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 28, 2010 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Both are good points

but depending on who you are, when you’re in the same ballpark price-wise (and it can be argued that the Booklet 3G compares directly to the most expensive iPad), those concerns aren’t deal breakers, or even of much consequence at all. But if you’re not a Windows person, I can see why a netbook like this would be anathema.

Some tech blog pundit wrote that the iPad is designed for iPhone/iPod touch users first and foremost – they already love the iPhone OS and sometimes wish that the screen was bigger. Well, here it is. Now, will anyone pay for it? A lot of analysts say yes, but we’ll see. I think probably yes, but not to the same extent as the iPhone.

by PhilR8 on Jan 28, 2010 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

It's something I'd like to have.

But it’s hardly necessary. I could see myself getting one in a couple of years. Not now. Particularly since I just got a new MacBook Pro for the first time in 5 years.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 28, 2010 2:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it's a nice alternative to a netbook

I had been thinking about buying a netbook, and this almost looks like a better alternative for what I would have used a netbook for – web browsing, movies, stuff like that. But no flash in the browser is almost a deal-breaker in itself, and if I can’t install programs that exist outside of the app store… I don’t know. Just not feeling it yet, especially not at $499.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You can get a 10.1" screen netbook

for about $150 cheaper. And it will actually run a lot of Windows apps and will have a built-in USB input. Probably 3 of them.

Got my wife a netbook for her birthday and she can’t believe how much she uses it. Mostly just for watching QVC’s live feed when all the TVs are used….

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

my pc recently died. I looked at apple for about 3 seconds, came to my senses, and bought a gorgeous new slim tower pc with a widescreen HD monitor for 430 bucks.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Can anyone with an ESPN insider account say where the O's ranked...

…in Keith Law’s organizational rankings?

I know we can’t post the content, but we can post the number, right?

by James F on Jan 27, 2010 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

Ranked #6

very short blurb

6. Baltimore Orioles
A top-10 system despite the graduations of Matt Wieters and Chris Tillman as well as several lower-tier young arms speaks volumes about the organization’s turnaround under GM Andy MacPhail and scouting director Joe Jordan.

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Sweet, in the top 10 baby, even without Matty

I was wondering this earlier — knew I’d find the answer on CC… eventually… after scrolling past all the stuff above! My 2 cents… I generally have a paperback book in my purse. I don’t like change and am horrible with new technology.

by O Nina on Jan 27, 2010 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a BASEBALL blog, not a books and Apple products blog!

Don't give up, don't ever give up. - Jim Valvano

by BaltimoreSportsFan on Jan 27, 2010 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

Actually, this reminds me

The mlb.com app did look pretty cool.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

But a lot less cool than just watching the damn game on it. Where’s the MLB.TV app? AT&T probably killed that app before you could finish saying the letters MLB.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

O's DFA Sarfate to make room for Miggi

http://masnsports.com/2010/01/the-corresponding-roster-move.html

I will lead these Peoples to the promised land, also known as "Slightly Ahead of the Blue Jays." ~WietersRunDry

by Stacey on Jan 27, 2010 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

I'm going to draw a warm bath and clean a steak knife

and then I’ll be ready to watch the forthcoming interview with Dennis

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh, Sarfate was gone

as soon as Gonzalez was signed.

"I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars ... and you. What else you need to know?"

by Andrew_G on Jan 27, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I missed this

and FP’d a FanShot. Whoops!

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoever picks the group for the Super Bowl halftime shows needs to realize something.

You need to get bands that interest the “young crowd.” The last few acts were popular in 60’s (The Who) the 70’s and the 80’s (Prince, Tom Petty and Springsteen) Since Janet Jackson had an um…wardrobe malfunction, the NFL had been so conservative it’s jaw dropping. This year’s The Who are a great band, I’m not saying they’re bad, but give me a break, does anyone under 30 really know who they are? Before the malfunction the NFl had ligit bands, U2 in ‘02 comes to mind. They really should get back to that, see if Coldplay’s interested, perhaps the Black Eyed Peas. I don’t really care, but please have bands form this genration.

Don't give up, don't ever give up. - Jim Valvano

by BaltimoreSportsFan on Jan 27, 2010 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

I dunno

The Who is “safe” and still appeals to a large majority of the NFL audience, aka 25-60 year old white dudes. Sounds like a win-win for the NFL.

by PhilR8 on Jan 27, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

25-60 year old white dudes

aka the group with the most disposable income.

by kba26 on Jan 27, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Make that 40-60 y.o. white dude

I doubt seriously many 25 year olds can name 5 The Who songs.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

i'm 22

and can name quite a bit more than 5 Who songs. in fact, i kinda like them

by twistedlogic on Jan 27, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

damn it

We have to stop agreeing. I’ve seen them in concert a handful of times and they never disappoint. My parents had me wearing a Tommy shirt in the 3rd grade.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

see below.

zknower thinks I’m blowing sweet nothings into his ear.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Whether you care or not ...

… you continue to make a positive impression as someone wise beyond their years.

Me, I just seem to be transistioning from smartass to dumb old fuck.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

no, i think to smart old fuck :)

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I meant that to be a reply to twisted.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

But I'm ok with saying you are a smart old fuck.

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

who you callin' OLD?

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

I was listening to The Who at work today!

by O Nina on Jan 27, 2010 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

twenty two as well

Quadrophenia most def in my top ten albums of all time.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Jan 28, 2010 1:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, people under 30 know who The Who are

but I tend to agree with you somewhat. I enjoyed Petty, but it really has been kinda dull, though I dont know if I really want to see Jay-Z, the annoying new guy from American Idol, or some of the craptastic stuff that currently passes for music at half time either. Classic rock kinda has the most widespread appeal while generally being tame enough for everyone. Unfortunately, most classic rock bands are really old and shells of themselves at this point.

by daveh873 on Jan 27, 2010 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

The Who are a great band, I’m not saying they’re bad, but give me a break, does anyone under 30 really know who they are?

Please shoot me now.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

also,
You need to get bands that interest the "young crowd."

Why? Who gives a fuck about the “young crowd”? Just because you all buy video games doesn’t mean you’re going to buy season tickets tomorrow. And nobody decides to follow a sport because of who plays its halftime shows.

The majority of season ticket holders are guys above the age of 30. I’m fine with us being thrown a bone.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather have Metallica myself....

but that’s just me.

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 27, 2010 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

A thousand times this...

"I'd like to do something. We all would here," he added. "As I've said before, you just don't want to do anything stupid that you're thinking in May, 'What in the God's green earth was I thinking about?'" - Andy MacPhail 12/8/09

by getxstoked on Jan 27, 2010 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

rec'd

especially for

It’s all about dogs, horses & frogs telling me what beer to drink & repulsive, drooling infants telling me how to invest.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

"Its basically football for people who don't like football"

Couldn’t have said it better myself. I watched every game the NFL played this year, but I may be out of the country for the Super Bowl, and if I did miss it, I don’t think I’d be that disappointed.

Don’t forget ‘My Wife’, another great John Entwhistle written tune.

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey

by jobe on Jan 28, 2010 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

haha

well played.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Paul McCartney is old and was still a great choice

The entire crowd singing the “Na na na na” part of Hey Jude along with him – that was pretty classic stuff. Even for people in their 20s, because I can tell you that was pretty well-received among my friends.

You gotta be timeless already to get in to the halftime show (OK, I don’t know how that explains Tom Petty or the infamous Janet Jackson/Timberlake moment). Coldplay? Get that weak shit out of my house.

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Jan 27, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Tom Petty is actually pretty damned timeless.

Seriously, the dude has had chart-topping hits going on three decades now. He’s like Rod Stewart. He’s also one of the most revolutionary and influential music-video guys.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i didn't mean they are similar talent-wise.

my point was that they’re both prolific.

"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic

by zknower on Jan 27, 2010 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I was not much of a Rod Stewart fan ...

… until I saw him in concert. I went because Blue Oyster Cult was opening for him. As much of a Cult fanatic that I was (and their performance was great that night) Stewart came out and blew them away. One of the best performances I’ve ever seen.

These days I don’t go to concerts in big arenas. And when I do, it’s for the likes of seeing Michael Bouble. (It’s my birthday present to my wife. Not so much the ticket, but the fact I’m going with her.)

Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.

by timg56 on Jan 27, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Maggie, I wish I'd never seen your face

I’ll get on back home one of these days o/~

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Jan 27, 2010 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Great minds think alike. :)

Cry havoc and unleash the Esskay hot dogs of war! - The Wayward Oriole, Opening Day 2008

by Eat More Esskay on Jan 28, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I love Tom Petty.

I told my friend to watch the halftime show that year, and she was hooked. If you like Tom Petty, the Traveling Wilburys are amazing. Roy Orbison, Steve Winwood, George Harrison, Tom Petty, and Bob Dylan. It doesn’t get any better than that.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Anybody under 30

with parents with respectable taste in music knows who The Who are.

Coldplay?? Black Eyed Peas? fuck that.

by O'sFan21 on Jan 27, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Coldplay isn't THAT bad.

I won’t buy their music, but I wouldn’t shut off the radio if a song of theirs came on. The Black Eyed Peas are awful, though. More formulaic pop crap.

The Who are the shit.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 28, 2010 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Coldplay IS that bad

But then again…

"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal

by duck on Jan 29, 2010 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dscn6381_small
Oriole Birthday Mantra.
Small
On Being an Oriole Fan in Israel
Wieters_small
The O's and Early Bullpen Usage
Mlb_orioles_wieters_240_small
O-R-I-O-L-E-S! *NOT* Day-O!
Cc_small
Awesome Stuff

Recent FanPosts

Small
Okay, okay, I give! I'm sucked in!
4fgfgjfxe30x64uwibpb59rg9_small
Help with Baseball Statistics
Small
I have to ask...
091_small
Rooting for the Red Sox
4fgfgjfxe30x64uwibpb59rg9_small
Can we get a broadcasting coach or trainer for Mike Bordick?
Pbr_12_pack_small
Literary Lounge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Official Sponsor of Camden Chat GameThreads

Tankeray_medium
Tankeray provided by dayzd toe


Bowser

Cc_small Stacey

Koopa Troopas

Baltimore_oriole_avatar_small zknower

P1030831_small 2632

Rainbowsmall_small duck

Esskay_small Eat More Esskay

Youppi-192_small Andrew_G

Goombas

Birdman_small birdman

Thumbnail_small j.q. higgins

Img_0927_small dfa

4840750964_54cdc24eef_small James F

091_small WestcoastO'sFan

2009_june22_philliekid3_small twistedlogic

Yoshi_small PaulFolk