Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Heating Up: Miami Evens Series; LeBron, Wade Take Charge

Just say no to more starting pitching.

We keep hearing about the Orioles' desire to add another starting pitcher to the rotation in 2011. Am I the only one scratching my head over this?

The Orioles already have on their big league roster Jeremy Guthrie, Brian Matusz, Brad Bergesen, Jake Arrieta, and Chris Tillman. It is expected that at some point in 2011 Zach Britton will be ready to make his major league debut. That's one proven veteran, one blossoming star, one solid middle-to-back end of the rotation guy, and two promising youngsters. If the Orioles sign Carl Pavano or trade for Joe Blanton or something like that, which of these guys do you bump back down to AAA? And what good will it ultimately do the Orioles?

Even if there were an argument for adding another "proven" starting pitcher, with both the Rangers and Yankees missing out on Cliff Lee, the price on viable starting pitchers has probably just gone through the roof. What it would cost the Orioles in money, draft picks, and prospects has to be taken into consideration. But also to be taken into consideration is the development time it would cost whichever pitcher has to start the season in AAA so that this veteran innings eater can "stabilize" the rotation.

Tillman has nothing left to prove in AAA. If he can have sustained success in the majors is still to be seen, but sending him back to Norfolk won't help him. I personally questioned Arrieta's readiness at the time of his major league promotion, but after a somewhat disastrous start to his major league career, Arrieta began to progress nicely at the end of last season. Do either of these fellows belong in the minors? I don't think so. And Bergesen, who spent his fair share of time on the Baltimore-Norfolk Express in 2010, has shown that he is who he is. He will not benefit from time in AAA either.

(Obviously Guthrie and Matusz aren't going anywhere)

The Orioles have on their 40-man roster Rick VandenHurk, who made 22 starts at AAA last year. They have Troy Patton, who made 25, and Brandon Erbe, who made 15. They also have Jason Berken who spent 2010 in the bullpen but who made 24 major league starts in 2009. Any of those players can fill in should one of the O's starters go down with injury. Will they be fantastic? Probably not. But they won't impede the progression of any of the talented youngsters on the staff.

The Orioles have spent the off-season so far preparing for the short-term future, and I'm fine with that. As someone who watches every single game I appreciate J.J. Hardy and Mark Reynolds. But when it comes to pitching they need to look past the benefits of a single year, because the young pitching will be what takes this team into contention or what keeps them in the basement. The Orioles need to give them every opportunity to improve, and they need to expose these pitchers to the best competition so they can weed out any that won't be able to contribute to the O's long term success.

Comment 161 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Camden Chat

Game 40 Overflow Thread

May 2012 by Eat More Esskay - 524 comments

Around the Minors, week 6!

May 2012 by dfa - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

If all the Orioles do from here on out

is add an innings-eater, some relief help, and a short term 1Bman, then I’ll be a little bit ticked off. Those are the kinds of moves that an 85 win team should be making, not a 65 win team. Adding veteran starting pitching does not make sense for this team, bottom line.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Disagree.

Adding veteran pitching is what we should do, not to add finishing touches to a contending team, but to protect us from having to over-expose the young arms from overwork. We don’t want to open Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman, or Britton to possible injury or developmental stagnation from having a weak and tired bullpen due to having to pick up waay too many innings too quickly.

That exact scenario has been a repeated over and over the last decade plus. Not that we had any Hall of Famers in the staff, but at minimum, it suppresses your statitsical value and hence future options later.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know what "supresses your statistical value" means

But how would their development stagnate from a weak and tired bullpen? What?

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I also have no idea what you just said

not that the point isn’t valid – I just don’t have any idea what your point was.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think his point is hard to understand

he’s saying that if the bullpen is weak and overused, the manager might be tempted to ramp up his young pitchers’ innings too quickly. I don’t necessarily agree because MacPhail and Showalter seem to be pretty reasonable guys when it comes to limiting young starters’ innings (not to mention we go with a 7 man bullpen anyway, so there’s no reason it should be tired).

I honestly don’t see the problem with adding a veteran starting pitcher though. there’s nothing preventing us from blooding the young starters in the bullpen (don’t you remember when that used to be the norm, in the Earl Weaver days?). Neftali Feliz started in the pen, David Price started in the pen, Aroldis Chapman started in the pen… and these guys were better, more complete prospects than the likes of Britton and Tillman are right now.

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

i should add

I don’t remember the Earl Weaver days myself because I wasn’t born back then. so I guess I mean “remember” in a figurative sense…

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

EXACTLY

I might add that Chamberlain, Hughes, Lester too started in the pen. What’s missing here to me is that, there’s a philosophical teaching moment here that shouldn’t be undervalued. When you start a kid in the bullpen, you are giving them a chance to prove that they can pitch in the majors, and, earn or win the rotation job.

If we added a veteran, and all goes right, why couldn’t we just trade that guy 2-3 months after the season starts? As opposed to, starting with 5 young arms in there, and realizing that the short starts are taxing everyone so we need to add a starting pitcher in midseason, which is pretty much next to impossible.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Not if the pitcher you add is in your minor league system

Then it’s quite easy.

As for your examples:

Jon Lester has appeared in 124 major league games. 123 of them have been starts.

Joba was jerked around from the moment he was brought to the majors and currently sucks.

Phil Hughes only got moved to the bullpen after failing in the rotation. He did well in the bullpen so they moved him back to the rotation where he was quite pedestrian.

If you’re going to use examples, please make sure they are accurate.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Jeez.

You’re pretty snarky. I’m just raising a counterpoint to your idea. And, to be frank, it’s not really that controversial at that. All I am saying is to play the conservative high percentage move, rather than roll the dice. If every start Tillman had last year was, say, 5 innings, I’d say for for it. But it just wasn’t.

I just feel like I’ve seen this same story play out over and over the last 13 or so years.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I am pretty snarky in general

And I don’t mean to sound harsh or anything, but you can’t just name three pitchers without actually knowing if it’s true. If you want use that as your argument and choose to back it up with facts, back it up with actual facts, not things that you assume to be true or things that can be proven wrong with one quick trip to Baseball Reference.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I am at work so I can't really get REALLY into this debate...

..so my problem was that I didn’t check my facts. I apologize for that. Thanks for ripping into me for not doing so. I just don’t want to lose my job because of a baseball talk.

;)

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Well I say this sincerely and I hope in a way that doesn't sound mean

But if you don’t have time to make sure your facts are right, you shouldn’t say them.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:59 AM EST up reply actions  

ok.

Next time I won’t comment at all.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I just couldn't resist.

I’ve watched Orioles baseball for 30+ years and I feel like I’ve heard this broken record before.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

You're welcome to disagree

I enjoy a good discussion, just not a discussion with incorrect facts thrown in with the expectation that we should take them at face value. That’s why I don’t like politics.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

just stating on record

that I disagree with this.

People comment with loose/mistaken facts on this site ALL THE TIME. And then someone sets them straight. That’s part and parcel of contributing to a well-informed baseball blog.

Not everyone has the time to look up everything they post about and back it up, which is why we shouldn’t be defensive if someone checks our work.

That said, it’s possible to correct someone’s facts without a reprimand.

basemonkey, I’d hope you don’t stop commenting just because of this exchange.

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah well

I think that ff you don’t know the facts for certain, don’t say them. He could have made his argument without putting those names out there. And if he (or anyone) chooses to say something that then gets disproven, then so be it. I get called snarky for saying something isn’t true when it isn’t true? Whatever, dude. Don’t make shit up, then.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

we just disagree
I think that ff you don’t know the facts for certain, don’t say them.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people stating what they believe to be true. There’s a pretty big gulf between that and “making shit up”.

You assert someone shouldn’t say anything unless they’ve researched it at B-R first. I’m saying I think it’s just fine for someone to say something based on their general knowledge/recollection. (For example, I had the same perception of Lester starting in the ’pen… not sure why).

I don’t know a place where I could go right now to find “major league starters who began their careers with significant time in the ’pen.” So if I was making an argument based on my perceptions, I’d probably just try to think of a few guys who fit that description. All three of the names above are starters who spent some time in the ‘pen, and who had success at one point or another, so they’re legitimate names to throw out. And it’s also completely legitimate for someone else (you, in this case) to say, “no, here’s why that’s a bad example.”

But you don’t have to crucify someone when you point out their mistakes. And I fervently disagree that someone should say nothing instead of saying something that they’re vague on. The overall point of the board is to enlighten us all, and by having the discussion above, anyone who reads it is armed with better facts for the future.

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

That's not what I said

I know plenty of things that I don’t have to look up on B-R.com. But if I don’t know something, I don’t say it. I don’t understand why that’s so difficult. I think that his argument was just as strong without using specific names, but using specific names that are incorrect weakens it.

I’m not going to apologize for wanting people to be educated before they open their mouths.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

This is the whole point
But if I don’t know something, I don’t say it.

Lots of people THINK they know something until they say it and someone points out they’re wrong.

To have a standard where nobody even comments on a blog unless they are 100% absolutely sure about their facts is a pretty high standard. One that would drive down traffic here considerably.

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Earlier today

Before commenting with 7 season WHIPs on Blanton and Guthrie in Open Thread, I checked B-R twice before posting it, dreading a ripping. Then I noticed that I had failed to account for the fact that Guthrie’s first 3 ‘seasons’ had so few games, and dreaded it anyway. I dig facts (tho command few of them) and love reading CC, but I wondered if that was healthy.

Has there ever been a cooler Oriole than Eddie Murray? I mean, just straight up cool. Like a bad, suave dude. You know what I'm sayin'. COOL. SC 7/24/08

by 33 on Dec 14, 2010 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't see what's wrong with that.

If you’d stopped your comment with “Joe Blanton isn’t quite as good as Guthrie” or however you said it, that’d be a good comment. But once you decide to put in specifics, the specifics should be correct. That’s all.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

yes'm

Has there ever been a cooler Oriole than Eddie Murray? I mean, just straight up cool. Like a bad, suave dude. You know what I'm sayin'. COOL. SC 7/24/08

by 33 on Dec 14, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, and Jon Lester spent one game in the pen

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

David Price wasnt hurt by it

I think a limited session in the pen isn’t a terrible idea. But you need good communication about how long it will be.

"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law

by Reddrummer9187 on Dec 14, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Johan Santana

is the classic recent example, though most thought that they left him in the pen too long.

by Joltin Joe Orsulak on Dec 14, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

My personal belief is that talent wins out in the end. Unless you’re just yanking them around forever, that could be detrimental.

"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law

by Reddrummer9187 on Dec 14, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

MOD FIGHT!

Sorry, I got nuthin’ to add.

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 1:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure...

I’m an old vet from Orioles Hangout, other Os boards, Sickel’s site, milb, mlbtraderumors, and etc…Had a job with MILB back in the day so that allowed me a lot of time on these things. I don’t post on Camden Chat much nowadays though.

Generally speaking, from those who know me, I am pretty even-keeled and I try to be as objective as possible. I can’t say that I am especially encouraged that I got smacked down by the mod/writer here for posting offhand knowledge impulsively which was a mistake. True, I was wrong in my facts by not checking them, and I freely own up to that. Then again, I’m not a writer who is publishing an article which requires to be scorned as bad journalistic integrity. It’s a comment board. The spirit of discussion is to discuss, not adhere to someone’s self-righteous notion of the right way to speak. Discourse is messy, organic, and tense. People speak the way they speak. That’s the whole point.

I will continue reading. I wish you well. Thanks anyways.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure I'm inclined to return...

I’m an old vet from Orioles Hangout, other Os boards, Sickel’s site, milb, mlbtraderumors, and etc…Had a job with MILB back in the day so that allowed me a lot of time on these things. I don’t post on Camden Chat much nowadays though.

Generally speaking, from those who know me, I am pretty even-keeled and I try to be as objective as possible. I can’t say that I am especially encouraged that I got smacked down by the mod/writer here for posting offhand knowledge impulsively which was a mistake. True, I was wrong in my facts by not checking them, and I freely own up to that. Then again, I’m not a writer who is publishing an article which requires to be scorned as bad journalistic integrity. It’s a comment board. The spirit of discussion is to discuss, not adhere to someone’s self-righteous notion of the right way to speak. Discourse is messy, organic, and tense. People speak the way they speak. That’s the whole point.

I will continue reading. I wish you well. Thanks anyways.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

it's the internet.

These kinds of things happen, and they are usually blown out of proportion because the internet gives a person no voice, and therefore something can easily be perceived as edgy, rude, or snarky when it’s not meant to be.

Best thing to do is just to let it go. But I suppose if it’s that big of a deal that you need to leave, then by all means (see, that totally sounds antagonizing, but I really don’t mean it to be, I just mean that it’s your prerogative to leave if you choose).

by cjatud2012 on Dec 14, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, I thought Stacey's original response was pretty nice.

She even said please check your facts. And there are no personal attacks or even much snark. You made a factual error, she politely posted the correct facts, and asked nicely that you check your facts. Maybe it’s a bit snarky to ask you to check your facts, but it wasn’t done in a mean way. If you want to see snark and “smacking down”, see her responses to Jen Royale in other threads.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I did think I was being kind of nice

But my guard went up when I was told, “Jeez, you’re snarky.”

Maybe I’m just totally clueless but I just don’t get what is so wrong with expecting people not to post things that they don’t know are true.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Also

You’re an old vet from OH? Some of the posters there are vicious compared to me, and they’d be the first to point out erroneous facts.

But whatever. I hope you’ll stick around. I wasn’t trying to be a bitch.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

They're also really good at making stuff up

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 5:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

No place for facts over there!

I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck

by twistedlogic on Dec 15, 2010 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope you stay

Not that I have much to add, but I definitely recognize your handle and have enjoyed reading your posts. I used to be on OH even before their rivals days, but there are just too many ‘characters’ over there.

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Ohh yes.

A lot of shenanigans there. I used to be a founding mod at Scout’s Oriole board. I have a lot of random experience going to minorleague games, playing baseball through college, and even some low level scouting as an adult. Since a kid in the Earl Weaver days. I am not going to tout being an expert over anyone. It’s not my style. I think everyone’s view is worthy of thought. Though like many of us who have seen the 70s Orioles in these parts, we feel like we’ve seen a first-rate franchise with excellent management and development firsthand, so for better or worse, a lot of our views might come from that experience. I always wonder about the MD kids today who are too young to remember the days when the Os were a regional sensation. They weren’t just good. They were what was good about baseball.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not even saying I don't believe in the young guys...

I do. I especially like Britton. But the fact of the matter is, that even a rookie ROY season is going to be an okay season by normal majorleague standards. I love Matusz’s future and think he’s for real. As far as Tillman, Arrieta, and Bergesen they are all promising, but to be totally frank, they could also be completely out of baseball in about 6 or so years.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree on that last part

But how does it help the team to bring in a guy for one year to “eat innings” either way?

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Look...

I don’t want to see the Os bring in another Millwood either. Nothing would annoy me more than sitting through another round of those types of games, but if it results in ruining a 35 yr old arm by forcing him to “take one for e the team” in a abd start and saving the bullpen, to save it for Matusz’ starts, then so be it.

In a best case scenario, we start with a vet SP and one of our young promising guys like Tillman starts to shine in mop-up duty and spot starts to force the issue. We end up trading that vet for useful pieces by the break, and Tillman gets 100+ IP of promsing work.

Otherwise, if those young guys can’t pitch in mop-up duty or take advantage of spot starts, would they actually fare better or deserve a bigger role as a regular no-choice every 5th day guy?

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

I believe that was part of the theory with Millwood, and nobody would touch him at the break. Giving a guy random spot starts won’t help them settle into a groove in the pros. Let them pitch now and see what we have.

by tjk on Dec 14, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Because if you sign a veteran

and you can’t trade him, he stays in the rotation. That’s the thing about veterans. Teams don’t just give them the heave ho for younger players who are shining in AAA.

No pitcher the Orioles could sign will help them get to the playoffs next year or ever. The young guys already here might in the future, so you gotta give them the chance.

Jeremy Guthrie is the only veteran innings eater we need.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

not to mention...

bergesen will be entering his 3rd full season, matusz his second w/ significant experience in another season. while not exactly cagey vets, these guys aren’t babes in the woods, either.

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

But we can all agree that Arrieta will continue to be a babe.

Just because you know how to read, doesn't mean you'll like the book.

by arlingtonOsFan on Dec 14, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

rawr

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

so why did you want us to sign Bedard last year?
and you can’t trade him, he stays in the rotation. That’s the thing about veterans. Teams don’t just give them the heave ho for younger players who are shining in AAA.

No pitcher the Orioles could sign will help them get to the playoffs next year or ever. The young guys already here might in the future, so you gotta give them the chance.

A pitcher coming off surgery who was blocking the young kids? And not even a durable one, I might add?

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Because Bedard wasn't going to be ready to start the season

He ended up not pitching at all, but you know, we couldn’t have known that. I was of the belief that he’d be ready mid-season which is generally when we need another pitcher, not to start things off. Plus Bedard was 30 last year and has shown to be of quite above average talent when healthy, so giving him a chance to recover in Baltimore might lend to him staying on to help the team into contention.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

the real reason was because he is

BUH DARD

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

shh

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we could easily have traded Millwood

but the young guys weren’t doing very well at that point. Tillman was either in the minors or sporting a 5.50 ERA, Bergesen wasn’t doing so good, Matusz was looking OK but not great… and anyway, who would have taken his spot in the rotation? Berken and Hernandez were doing well as relievers at that point, Simon was also in the pen, Hendrickson would have served the same purpose (veteran stopgap) but considerably worse at eating innings…

if we can trade Steve Trachsel to the Cubs for 2 C/level prospects, I’m sure we could have traded Millwood for something if we’d really wanted to.

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

for something...

perhaps.

please recall that traksy was having an unsustainably successful campaignfor the first few months of the season that still looked decent on paper when he was dealt. the same cannot be said for the mentor.

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

though...

wow. actually, their splits look comparable. millwood going on the dl in july certainly didn’t help his value.

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

If I recall correctly

and I’d have to go back and look at our archives, but I think when he went on the DL that was pretty much the end of the trade talk. So you’re right, we might have gotten something Trashman worthy if that hadn’t happened.

I’ll never forget you, Rocky Cherry!

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha...Millwood was awful at the deadline though

Was Trachsel worse? (I’ve really tried to scratch any memories of guys like Trachsel and such even pitching here)

I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck

by twistedlogic on Dec 15, 2010 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

actually traschel was very good at the deadline

he started off the season a bit bumpy but then went a very nice streak of start up until the deadline.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 15, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Why would you use Joba as an example? He sucks.

I am eating you, motherfucker. You cannot hurt me. - PhilR8

by O'sFan21 on Dec 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe that's why!

It’s nice to remember that he sucks.

Just because you know how to read, doesn't mean you'll like the book.

by arlingtonOsFan on Dec 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree completely

"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law

by Reddrummer9187 on Dec 14, 2010 10:07 AM EST reply actions  

Based on seeing the 70s Orioles...

..I tend to be of the school of thought that you force your kids to earn their way in, and create a climate of competition that is fierce. A lot of the great Oriole pitchers in the franchise’s history were brought up through long relief, waiting for an opportunity.

We also have to remember the extremely high likelihood that every season features at least one significant injury of some sort to an arm in the rotation. If we were to track this, depending on what you mean by “significant”, you could argue that the Orioles have not had an rotation injury-free season in, say, 20 or so years. It’s not to say that the Os are snakebit. It’s just the way pitching is.

So, it’s highly likely that even if we start the season with 7 deep in rotation arms, we might still end up short by September. The fact of the matter is that we don’t have a relable proven workhorse beyond Guthrie.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:09 AM EST reply actions  

I mentioned this in the other thread

and I feel like I’m a broken record: if you bring in a veteran, then the veteran is plan A and the kids are plan B in the event the veteran gets hurt. The Orioles are rebuilding and need to get the kids major league experience. Bringing in more starting pitching will not help that cause, it will not help anything.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, I was about to add that when you replied

The injury insurance should be below the young starters on the depth chart, not above.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I feel like this is theoretically true...

…on paper, but if the veteran you add is going to be slotted behind un-established rookies, then is that vet even worth adding? Wouldn’t that be pitchers like, say, Josh Towers who might be pining for another shot at a majorleague slot, not veterans who actually have track record to hold down a roster spot?

All I am saying is that if we go into Opening Day with that kind of set of options, it is next to impossible to add pitching after the season started. It just doesn’t work that direction. If you have too much pitching, you can always swap out parts, release players, and trade talent away. The other way around is just a lack of options that cannot be addressed, which would force us to just sit and watch the innings workload tick off on Matusz, hoping it won’t hurt him in the longrun (say, a la Zambrano).

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not talking about veterans below them on the depth chart

I’m talking about minor league guys, AAA guys. Like VandenHurk. And I don’t think it’s worth adding any veteran that isn’t young enough and good enough to help the Orioles for years. Cliff Lee I would have been happy to send Tillman or Bergesen back to AAA for. Joe Blanton? What does that do for the team?

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Well for whatever it's worth...

…right now I don’t think there’s anything close to a perfect fit for the Os regardless. And, I don’t think there is a decent trade piece either.

I agree with you that the Orioles young pitching picture is more and more at a crossroads, and these questions of going all-in, must be addressed at some point. I guess I am just in the school of thought that the kids need to force the issue. I would love it that Matusz breaksout, Tillman shows more legit consistency, Arritta improves, etc..But I can’t say that we are there yet. TO my memory, it just felt like TIllman and to a lesser extent Bergie and Arritta were still susceptible to a 3 IP start here and there. You can’t give pitchers who do that the keys to the car yet.

What comes to mind is the role Ted Lilly played with the young staff of Aces in OAK. Or, Doug Davis who ate a ton of innings for the Brewers while their young guys developed in the major league staff. We need some of that.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

so basically,

you want us to trade for Adam Eaton? :P

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the young pitchers on the O's have earned their way

by pitching their way through the minors and having some success last season. If you really had a number of young, talented pitchers on the team, then yes, let them compete. But what is the point of having Tillman or Arrieta compete with Joe Blanton? He’s nobody to the future of the Orioles.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I am just scarred by...

…too many Matt Riley-esque kids who naturally come up feeling entitled to a big league roster slot because they feel like they paid their dues in the minors.

The better pitchers and players tend to be the guys who continue to work hard after reaching the majors, not the ones who feel like the majors are the reward and their road is over. The ones who become All-Stars are generally very hard-workers on top of being vastly gifted and lucky.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Why on earth would you think any of the Orioles starters are like that?

And how can they continue to work hard after reaching the majors if you don’t let them stay there?

I mean no offense, but you really aren’t making much sense to me.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't mean to suggest any of these guys are like Riley...

…that said, what we hear publically while they are players, is one thing. What the reality is is another. There is a real bubble that is created around the clubhouse that is necessary. TO assume that all of these kids are anything but kids and not the uber-mature wholesome boys they are portrayed as in the media is a little naive. Even Riley when he was a bonus baby was portrayed in a similar way. He only started getting wacky and ridiculous to us once he started doing things like not resting before starts and the administration decided to stop protecting him.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

well, they are all about 5 years or more older than Riley was when he reached the big leagues

so it would be a little presumptuous to assume they aren’t more mature than an 18 year old notorious hothead.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Again...

I am not saying these kids are Riley. So let’s stop that. I regret even uttering his name now.

All I am saying is that, the kids are mature good promising guys. I believe. I just think we need to put them in a position to succeed, not give them the keys to the business and tell them to take over just yet. We can’t just hope they become our version of the A’s current young staff and ignore the results thus far.

by basemonkey on Dec 14, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think there's any reason to accuse Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman, Britton, or Bergesen

of thinking the majors are the goal and that they have stopped working hard now that they are here.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

don’t you think a “joe blanton” should be a nickname for a gross sex act?

like “things were going well till she asked for the ol’ Joe Blanton — so i hightailed it outta Dave n Busters….”

by thewaywardO on Dec 14, 2010 10:09 AM EST reply actions  

there’s no real objective answer to this. you can argue the “let the kids pitch” thing and you can also make a case for the “bring in a vet” thing.

the real question is: HOW BIG a DONKEY IS YANKEES today?

by thewaywardO on Dec 14, 2010 10:25 AM EST reply actions  

Jeff Francis

I’d love to think all the young pitching will coalesce, but I don’t think there is anything wrong with signing a free agent starter for a couple million dollars. Jeff Francis struggled as he came back from surgery to be sure, but he also represents a fair amount of upside. Signing a guy like him makes a lot of sense because it won’t force the Orioles to promote someone who isn’t ready (like they did with Josh Bell last year), and if one young pitcher is getting taken to the woodshed over the first two months of the season, it would be nice to have some guy who I don’t necessarily care about. Betting on all the young pitching is a pretty risky bet, and I am not sure how much I want to see VandenHurk every fifth day next year.

As long as the pitcher doesn’t cost a draft pick (i.e., Carl Pavano) or a lot of money (i.e., Rich Harden) or has limited upside (i.e., Mentor), than I would be all for it.

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 10:47 AM EST reply actions  

Just say no to Blanton and Pavano

Blanton stinks in the NL and he would have to transition to the AL. Recipe for disaster. Pavano is injury-prone and gets crushed by lefties. Not a good combo for the yard.

The only difference between this year’s staff and last years is Milwood. So is anyone really upset if you stand pat instead of paying way too much for a Milwood replacement?

Alec: Chris, did you really buy a $1400 toilet?
Chris: Yeah, it's great. It's Japanese and has those little warm water jets that clean the undercarriage.
Eric: Chris, it's a toilet, you shit in it.

by pfhokie on Dec 14, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

Meh

You can never have too much pitching. There is still plenty of reason to believe that Bergy isn’t a major league starter, Erbe is out probably for the year after surgery, and neither Arrieta nor Tillman have pitched a single full year in the majors. On top of this, Guthrie is potential trade bait if he’s pitching well at the deadline once again. If we can add a starter either like a Blanton in a salary dump from the Phillies or someone cheap on a one year deal why not do it? What harm can this depth do us? At worst, it frees us to possibly trade a starter to a contender or in a deal for an elite player. The Red Sox get it; they are looking at Blanton despite having a rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Lackey and Dice-K already with Wakefield waiting in the wings. The Red Sox are smart. We could do far worse than to imitate them.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 11:39 AM EST reply actions  

You don't think that the $21M Joe Blanton is owed over the next two years could be better spent?

That’s a crapload of money.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

the Phillies would eat part of it

I mean, what would be the point of keeping him for them? Kyle Kendrick is just as “good” as a 5th starter, and being paid considerably less. I think they’d eat about half the salary and expect nothing of value in return.

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I don't think he'd cost us $21 million

I think the Phillies will have to pick up a bunch of that before they can trade him anywhere, and/or toss in a good prospect or two. If we can get Blanton from the Phillies along with someone like Jarred Cosart with the Phillies picking up $5M or so, I think that’s a good deal for us, particularly since I think we can turn around and flip Blanton again at the deadline or in the offseason.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that if you start talking about other pieces coming back in a trade along with him

Then maybe it’s worth considering, depending on the return. But that doesn’t appear to be the O’s motive in any of these things. They’ve been talking about another starting pitcher for awhile, and Blanton has just been a name created because of the Lee signing.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, you know me...

…I’ll never underestimate the O’s ability to be dumb. But if there is a good deal available to add a starter, I see no reason to pass it up. Starters get hurt, are ineffective, and if those things don’t happen are great bait at the deadline. Worse things could happen than our having too many starters.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

It just seems a shame for one of the guys to stay in AAA

while someone who has no impact on the future hangs around on the O’s.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, Britton belongs in AAA to start the year...

…and Bergy may always be a guy who should shuttle between AAA and the fifth starter spot. As for Tillman, if you recall I made the argument that he may need time in the ML bullpen until he learns to get major league hitters out with his fastball. So, if he still hasn’t mastered that, having him take the David Hernandez role for a while isn’t the worst idea. And Arrieta to me is a huge question mark, someone whose future may still be in the bullpen long term or who may need more time in AAA working on his secondary pitches.

And like I said, this is all best case scenario stuff anyways. Say Arrieta or Matusz gets hurt. So Vanden Hurk, a famously injury prone guy, is now our depth? And when he goes down? Berken isn’t going to start anymore, I suspect, and while I think Patton should remain a starter the club seems to think of him as a future lefty specialist.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree on Britton

I don’t know about Bergy. He’s had two years in the big leagues and has, I think, pretty adequately shown who he is. Even when he getting poorly last year (and as a result being sent back to Norfolk over and over), his stats that mattered showed that he was pitching better than the results. I wrote about it (with a little help from you, I believe) but am too lazy to go find the link right now.

I was looking at this pretty much from the perspective of extra pitchers putting Tillman in the minors, where he does not need to be. I believe that’s where the Orioles would send him. I don’t think they’d put him in the pen. Maybe they’d surprise me, I don’t know.

Arrieta really came on strong over his final six or so weeks (I’m trying to look up his splits on FanGraphs but the page isn’t loading for me), and yes, his future might be in the bullpen, but we don’t know that, and I think now is the time to find out.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem with Bergy...

…right handers who don’t throw hard always live on a razor’s edge. Bergy has to only lose a tiny amount of movement to be done as a major league starter. Yes, as long as he keeps pitching exactly like he has, he’ll be adequate. Baseball is littered with righties who haven’t managed that.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough

I know that if you say enough words I’ll just end up agreeing with you anyway. You’re magic that way.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Ooh I always appreciate when James makes a joke :)

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Tillman

I would not be in favor of a course of action that puts Tillman in AAA for another year. Britton needs a year at Norfolk. Having said that, it would be hard to turn down Blanton offered as a salary dump. So, it a player like Blanton is offered to us for mere money, take him. Don’t seek him out if we have to part with our dwindling group of prospects.

by BaltoBen on Dec 14, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

We can do better than Blanton though right!

Blanton just isn’t very good. He wasn’t in Philly, and he wasn’t in Oakland either, which is rather pitcher friendly. Is Brad Penny still out there? I’d rather have him than Bulldog Blanton. He’s been under Dave Duncan’s tutelage recently so that alone makes Jim more attractive right? Plus better stuff. I’d have more patience for him than Blanton.

by KellRawLive on Dec 14, 2010 6:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I read it was $17M over two years.

And knowing Andy, he will want Phillies to eat a portion of that.

Alec: Chris, did you really buy a $1400 toilet?
Chris: Yeah, it's great. It's Japanese and has those little warm water jets that clean the undercarriage.
Eric: Chris, it's a toilet, you shit in it.

by pfhokie on Dec 14, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I dont know

I looked it up on Cots and it said he’ll make $10.5M in both 2011 and 2012.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

mlbtraderumors is saying $17M.

If Joe Blanton was a free agent, I don’t think he land a 2 year, $17M contract, but something close. Maybe 2/$12M.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

No way

Big Joe could work anywhere near the amount of innings in the AL East as he does in the NL. NL East isnt a cake walk division but add in that DH and subtract some of the NL “small ball” it would be a whole new world. I know he pitched well for the A’s about 4 or so years ago but that is still a different monster is it not?

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Blanton has been a 2 win player in 2009 and 2010

$6M per year for 2 years isn’t an outrageous figure especially considering a win has been going for about $5M in today’s market.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh? Of course.

I was saying that I think Blanton could get 2/$12M on the open market now. I didn’t say that was his actual salary.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

He's a bum

I cant stand Joe B no way would I think anyone should pay him 8 plus. I thaught Philly overpaid and I live in the area and others more than agree. Even 6 Mil for a guy who would have a 5+ ERA in this division idk

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry ment to put this up here

from Jeff Fletcher @ Fanhouse

Expect National League teams that play in big ballparks to be most interested in Blanton. The Mets, who need an inning-eating starter, might be a good fit if the Phillies would trade him within the division. The Padres might also be a good home for Blanton, but they’d obviously need the Phillies to pick most of the contract.

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

he Padres might also be a good home for Blanton, but they’d obviously need the Phillies to pick most of the contract.

Yeah, that’s not surprising. Padres are cheap skates. I have a feeling they’ll find a team who’ s willing to pick up a good chuck of the contract. The Mets seem like a really good bet.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

you do know...

that he started his career in the AL, right? I mean he wasn’t an amazing pitcher with the A’s, but 3 of his 4 years he was definitely above average. so you can’t just say “hey he had an ERA near 5 in the NL last year, must be a bad pitcher”.

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Not saying that

I was saying the AL east is different from the NL east. Even when Joe B was with the As they wernt in exactly a power division eiither

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

WAR is park adjusted, and I believe, league adjusted as well, but I'm not 100% sure.

He’s a 2 win player. He’s a decidedly an average pitcher. There’s value in that.

Spewing negativity.

by birdman on Dec 14, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Joe Blanton isn't worth it,

but there are other options that are appealing.

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Brad Bergesen IS a MLB pitcher

Dammitt, not every starter becomes Jm Palmer. 3E1N is a perfectly acceptable option as a #4 starter. Sure, he may be at or near his ceiling, but the world (and the O’s) needs #4 starters, too. The constant denigration of Bergesen is without merit and undeserved.

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 2:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Bergesen is underrated

As you said, he’ll never be a top of the rotation guy, but honestly, how many are there? Not even half of MLB teams have a guy like that (excluding Philly’s 4) but Bergesen is consistent at what he does, and it is absolutely good enough to be MLB worthy. He just has to wear some shin guards when pitching.

by YeahDonnie on Dec 14, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

consistent...

except when he’s not. first half of last year was an unmitigated disaster.

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

True

but I attribute that mostly to the injury and the whole MASN commercial re-injury. I should have said when healthy, he’s been consistent.

by YeahDonnie on Dec 14, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow

I actually forgot about that

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh! I have the compromise

it’s name is “swingman”. Someone get Brian Burres on the phone!

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 12:16 PM EST reply actions  

That'd make Jim Palmer happy.

You never know when someone is gonna sneak up on ya at the dolphin show! -wrb1990

by Stacey on Dec 14, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

he IS available, you know.

whither the bassman?

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the idea of bringing in any player

where the best case scenario is “We can flip him at the deadline or he’ll get hurt!” is not strategically effective. Sure didn’t work with anybody we had last year.

I could dream it forever and still not do it, but when the time comes for it to be done, God, I want to be ready for it.

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

tejada? o, man?

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

But who

who would you really like to get to pitch for a year here that 1. Will want to come to Bmore 2. Pitch in the AL East and 3. Know they most likely get moved. Also who is the odd man out?

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm against bringing in more starters

"This is a time when if we weren’t cynical we’d shoot ourselves."

by Andrew_G on Dec 14, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Steve Trachsel

I’d much rather have a guy with upside, but there is nothing wrong with taking a guy with questionmarks to see if he is good enough for a contender IMO. Of course, the Orioles aren’t really in this position any more because we need to be giving innings to young guys (when they are ready of course, which is the bone of contention here it seems to me).

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

But why

If the young guys like Timman, Arrieta, and Bergy and even a small part of our plan then just let them start the season. Many of these guys seemed to respond to Buck when he took over. Let ERbe and Britton come out of the pen and spot start here and there to save some of the other guys w/ an inning cap. We have certain guys in the pen for certain situations and keep them in those roles but the young guys who are in the fold to start down the road only bring them in at the start of an inning. Let them get bits of experence here and there without burning them out. Then if needed the 2nd half switch. Throw Tillman and Arrieta to the pen in the same type of role and use Erbe and Britton as SP. Just please get us someone to play first. The pieces seem to be there to start to compete and we do have a decent amount of pitching and guys who can spot start lets stick with what we have for now with exception to 1B

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST reply actions  

The article

is pretty spot on for what I think. There is only so much they can learn in AA and AAA. Let em see Tex, SterRod, Gonzo, Eva and ect a bunch of times. Time to show and prove

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

every pitcher is different

Matusz skipped AAA completely, Tillman only pitched 96.2 innings before his first callup… I don’t think you can say that the O’s front office is too conservative in calling up their young prospects and sticking them in the rotation. also, a lot of you seem to be assuming that this pitcher we bring in would have a good chance of preempting a young kid from the rotation. I don’t think that’s true at all. we’ve signed guys like Hendrickson and Eaton, sure, but they moved to the bullpen (or were released) if a prospect was ready to come up. would they have done the same with Millwood? I don’t know, but I don’t think there was anyone you could point to and say “this guy deserved to be in the rotation, but was blocked by Millwood”.

by ugen64 on Dec 14, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

great point.

"this guy deserved to be in the rotation, but was blocked by Millwood".

Insert any high promise young pitcher, and, any veteran SP we’ve had, and I don’t think you could say that any such pitcher blocked any such high promise guy. For one thing, I don’t think you can say that the Os have had the kind of quality young guys that they have right now. The truth of the matter is that, no veteran has been blocking any young pitcher in the last 12 or so years because the team has always been in such desperate need for any kind of pitching that it’s always seemed to be an arm or two short of what is suffiecient, hence all of the pitching staff August September collapses.

by basemonkey on Dec 15, 2010 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Boston

is looking at Matt Albers, Get him Theo I would love for him to come into the game against the Os. No 7 run lead would be safe

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 2:23 PM EST reply actions  

Chris Tillman said so himself last season that his time back in AAA allowed him to work on a new “cutter.” I’m not sure if there is anything else he can improve on, but he’s only 22. To think that there’s nothing else to prove in the minors is a bit strong, I think.

by Keith R on Dec 14, 2010 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

But

saying he needs to be in the minors to work on those things seems a bit of an over reaction too. I think nearly every pitcher in MLB has something they could work on too. So from the point of him needing to go down to work on something I dont think someone could make an excuse for him to beed to be in AAA to work on it

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

O's Close to Landing Gregg

Joe McDonald of ESPN.com reports that the Orioles are close to a two-year, $12 million deal with reliever Kevin Gregg.

The O’s offered Gregg a two-year deal in the $8-$10 million range last week, and were probably scared into upping it after Scott Downs pulled in a three-year, $15 million contract from the Angels a few days ago. Gregg had nice 3.51 ERA and 37 saves in 2011, but he’s not a $6 million reliever and the Orioles might have rushed into a bad signing. It’s not clear if they are going to ask him to close or stick with the plan of having Koji Uehara back there

by golfbard on Dec 14, 2010 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

Dan Connolley just tweeted

#Orioles have not made a $12 million offer to Kevin Gregg. Club doesn’t feel any deal is imminent. 2 year offer bw 8-10M still on table

by golfbard on Dec 14, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Take that shit off the table!

I am eating you, motherfucker. You cannot hurt me. - PhilR8

by O'sFan21 on Dec 14, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

He's a poor man's

Brad Lidge. Every game is an adventure. Alfredo sauce isnt much different and for the fact Gregg pitched in that big yard in Toranto to goto OPACY no thank you. Give him an Andy McP 2$ bill and call it even

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Fanhouse: Jeff Fletcher

Expect National League teams that play in big ballparks to be most interested in Blanton. The Mets, who need an inning-eating starter, might be a good fit if the Phillies would trade him within the division. The Padres might also be a good home for Blanton, but they’d obviously need the Phillies to pick most of the contract.

by siglin83 on Dec 14, 2010 4:23 PM EST reply actions  

is it just me...

or is the term “innings eater” one of the most annoying baseball idioms there is?

by cjatud2012 on Dec 14, 2010 5:02 PM EST reply actions  

proven veteran with playoff experience has to be up there!

I listened to the ESPN radio broadcast of Game 1 of the NLDS between SF and Atlanta. Chris Berman, on Brooks Conrad: “they love his grit.” A week later the bloom was off the rose, I’m guessin.

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

career whip of 1.335, 1.99 k/bb, 6.6 k/9, 3.3 bb/9

bb-ref page.

At least he didn’t cost a draft pick, so there’s that.

If you look at those UZR ratings or whatever

by dfa on Dec 14, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

proven closer!

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 14, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I like this deal.

Cheap, young-ish reliever with upside. Worst-case scenario: he fails or gets injured and we lost $1mil. Best case scenario: he pitches well, becomes a set-up guy, goes to arbitration next year. This is the way we need to sign relievers.

by SeanP on Dec 14, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

This is pretty much a textbook Andy MacPhail deal

and I mean that in a good way.

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

A note on Arrieta:

If we take Arrieta’s September/October xFIP (FIP adjusted for home runs) and compare it to the FIP of starters who pitched all of 2010, these are comparable starters: Danny Haren, John Danks, John Lackey, Edwin Jackson, Jason Hammel, Max Scherzer, Shaun Marcum, Gio Gonzalez, Mike Pelfry.

I know, that’s based on a very small sample size, but I think it represents Arrieta’s upside. I think that a lot of people have taken him for granted.

*Also: This is meant to be a quick and dirty look at Arrieta’s value. Nothing more.

by SeanP on Dec 14, 2010 6:39 PM EST reply actions  

Not only do you have a sample size problem...

…you have a selection bias problem.

To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by James F on Dec 14, 2010 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Hot damn!

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Reaction on OTM is lukewarm

someone kind-of remembered an Albers’ blowout against the Sox last year. Dig a bit further, boys. You’ll love what you find.

also we are the Bat-limore Orioles over in Monsterland. They proofread too!

by typozzz on Dec 14, 2010 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Minor League Offers

Has anyone heard if we’ve offered any minor league contracts to veteran starters or have we expressed any interest in doing so. To me this is really the only sort of idea we should be looking into as far as adding any more starters. If the youngsters don’t pitch well enough we can turn to one of these guys to ‘eat innings’ until someone is ready to step up.

Guys I’d look at (and sorry if someone has signed and I didn’t catch it) would be Freddy Garcia, Jeff Suppan, Rodrigo Lopez and Doug Davis just to name a few, I’m sure there are others. Now these guys may or may not be signed by other teams but I think we are an option that gives them a reasonably good chance to make a major league roster out of camp. Then again if the need presents itself we could always look around for a veteran forced out in spring training by a younger player.

I’m certainly in the camp that acquiring anyone being paid more than two or three mil has no benefit to a young team like the O’s

by Timbo Slice on Dec 14, 2010 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

Little early for that

Minor league deals probably will get handed out mid-January and after, I’d guess.

"It has nothing to do with corruption. It's sheer, complete, total incompetence." - Joe Rogan

by duck on Dec 14, 2010 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

i want greinke

and definitely DON’T want him in pinstripes.

other FA pitchers available:
JDuscherer
BPenny
CYoung
RHarden
BWebb
BChen
JFrancis
JWashburn

hard to believe none of these guys is conceivable better than Blanton. many of these guys are very talented, but can’t stay healthy, in the Bedard/Hampton mold. what would be wrong with an incentive-laded contract for one of these guys? assuming they’d take it, of course.

by Luke E on Dec 14, 2010 9:50 PM EST reply actions  

i should clarify that

i know Greinke is not a FA.

and i know we’ve tried bruce chen and he ain’t so hot. i should take him off that list, actually, but i’m ok with the others on the right deal.

by Luke E on Dec 14, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

How much is B Webb asking for?

by pwillisbeast52 on Dec 14, 2010 10:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm not sure if I'm remembering correctly

but I thought his agent had said that they were going to use Ben Sheets’ contract as a starting point. So $10 mil I guess.

If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.

by Knubles and Bits on Dec 14, 2010 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

$10 mil seems a bit much

Last I read, Webb had completely lost his velocity and was having trouble hitting 90. That was a few months ago though. That said, I wouldn’t mind giving him a shot on a minor league/minimal major league contract.

.02

by HIO'sFan on Dec 15, 2010 3:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Cy Young is a free agent?

I wonder if he’ll take a minor league deal.

by SeanP on Dec 15, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd like to add Brian Bannister

Brian Bannister seems like he struggles in odd years. Brian Bannister, as it has been reported countless times, is an intelligent pitcher who might benefit from a “change of scenery”. Brian Bannister is 30-years-old. Brian Bannister probably likes crab cakes. Brian Bannister: if I knew how I would have you marvel at statistics of Brian Bannister’s starts versus the Orioles, but I don’t so I can’t but he was probably great…practically?

You know what else has the initials B.B.? Big Brother.

Brian Bannister.

Have a good night.

by Dr Orpheus on Dec 15, 2010 5:52 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah...

i like the idea of bannister in theory.

At all hazards, a man must keep up appearances. Dignity, I say. Dignity above all, Governor. Hear, hear!

-Det. William "Bunk" Moreland

by j.q. higgins on Dec 17, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Chien-Ming Wang

Cost Washington 2 Million last year.
Is a FA. Was non tendered by Washington.
Will be only 31 Opening Day.
Has pitched in the AL East.

by thezeroes on Dec 14, 2010 10:52 PM EST reply actions  

did not pitch last year, and sucked the year before.

"I put a pepper rub on the scallops so you have a little contrast. You have sweetness from the coconut oil and little acidity from the splash of lemon." – Luke Scott

by zknower on Dec 14, 2010 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Well written, Stacey

a good read and correct on so many points that I wouldn’t have thought of.

When you're born into the human race you're given a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America, you're given a front row seat. And some of us have notepads.-George Carlin

by Afghanistan Steve on Dec 14, 2010 11:33 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The SB Nation blog covering the Baltimore Orioles.

Please read our Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dscn6381_small
Oriole Birthday Mantra.
Small
On Being an Oriole Fan in Israel
Wieters_small
The O's and Early Bullpen Usage
Mlb_orioles_wieters_240_small
O-R-I-O-L-E-S! *NOT* Day-O!
Cc_small
Awesome Stuff

Recent FanPosts

Small
Okay, okay, I give! I'm sucked in!
4fgfgjfxe30x64uwibpb59rg9_small
Help with Baseball Statistics
Small
I have to ask...
091_small
Rooting for the Red Sox
4fgfgjfxe30x64uwibpb59rg9_small
Can we get a broadcasting coach or trainer for Mike Bordick?
Pbr_12_pack_small
Literary Lounge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Official Sponsor of Camden Chat GameThreads

Tankeray_medium
Tankeray provided by dayzd toe


Bowser

Cc_small Stacey

Koopa Troopas

Baltimore_oriole_avatar_small zknower

P1030831_small 2632

Rainbowsmall_small duck

Esskay_small Eat More Esskay

Youppi-192_small Andrew_G

Goombas

Birdman_small birdman

Thumbnail_small j.q. higgins

Img_0927_small dfa

4840750964_54cdc24eef_small James F

091_small WestcoastO'sFan

2009_june22_philliekid3_small twistedlogic

Yoshi_small PaulFolk