Wednesday Bird Droppings
Ripken Says His Desire to Manage Baseball Is Growing - Bloomberg.com
Cal Ripken is getting the itch to get back in the game. He's always said he wanted to wait until his kids grow up and it looks like they're almost there. -Stacey
Orioles' Ernie Tyler plans comeback despite family wishes - baltimoresun.com
"As of now, I'm planning to be out there if I can get my legs back in shape," he said this week. "As you can see, I still have legs." Ernie Tyler is the man, people. -duck
Players have no hard feelings on contract renewals - baltimoresun.com
Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand why people think that players will be upset by getting renewed. That's baseball, as the saying goes. It happens all the time. -Stacey
Dempsey's Army takes a look at Matt Hobgood
Heath from DA spent some time in Spring Training last week. He took some videos of 2009 first round draft pick Matt Hobgood and liked what he saw. -Stacey
Orioles worry that Roberts might not be ready for Opening Day - baltimoresun.com
"Orioles president of baseball operations Andy MacPhail acknowledged that the club is concerned that second baseman Brian Roberts might not be ready for the start of the season." This isn't good., -duck
Brian Matusz, Matt Wieters lead Orioles' youth movement - Joe Lemire - SI.com
SI's spring training postcard from Sarasota. -duck
The Associated Press: Niemann, Longoria lead Rays over Orioles
Really, really short game story of yesterday's debacle. -duck
Orioles share tips at baseball clinic | Section Sports | HeraldTribune.com
I'm a sucker for stories of MLB players and kids, especially with cute pictures attached. -duck
Remember Matt Wieters? He's on the newest Sports Illustrated - Big League Stew - MLB Blog - Yahoo! Sports
Yahoo! Sports reminds us why Matt Wieters is on the SI cover. -duck
Highly drafted catchers who can hit and play defense come - SI Vault
Here's the SI cover story on Matt Wieters. I'm waiting until my issue comes in the mail tomorrow, but you can read it now. -duck
Q&A with MLB Hall of Famer Cal Ripken Jr. - MLB - SI.com
Cal Ripken spoke to SI, and got exactly one Orioles-related question. -duck
Roundup - No. 1 Pick Strasburg Has Strong Spring Debut for Nationals - NYTimes.com
Stephen Strasburg didn't suck for two innings yesterday. -duck
Baseball: Twins' Joe Nathan has elbow-ligament tear - San Jose Mercury News
The closer could miss all of this season and possibly 2011, too. Damn. -duck
THIS DAY IN CAMDEN CHAT HISTORY:
2006: Way to go, guys (Team USA win over South Africa in WBC), SC listed three members of the Orioles Top 40 of all time (No. 12 - Bobby Grich, No. 13 - Rafael Palmeiro (2006), and No. 35 - Mike Boddicker)
2007: Cards blank O's, 4-0
2008: SC compiles the Community Projection '08: Ramon Hernandez , yurizanow gives the Best Orioles-related news I've heard in awhile (rumors of O's dumping Jay Gibbons), Dave at Bottomfeeder Baseball wants to know did Anyone else see this? (B-Rob trade rumors) and jobe led a discussion OT: The Wire Finale (Spoiler Alert).
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FYI, the blackout has been lifted in the Baltimore Orioles local television market
for MLB Network’s simulcast of the Orioles at Pittsburgh Pirates Spring Training
game tomorrow, March 10, live at 7:00 p.m. ET. MLB Network will carry Fox Sports Net
Pittsburgh’s call of the game.
That would be today, right?
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
From "sports announcers say the darndest things"
“I’m not sure lacrosse will ever really catch on in Boston because we were raised to never trust an Irish guy with a stick. You just don’t know what he’s going to do with it.”
-Last night’s Cincinnati-Rutgers game
Here's a great Yankee hating story
by Matthew Berry. He also lists a good amount of Orioles in his fantasy love coloumn, fwiw.
Too good not to post
In the bottom of the fourth inning, the Yankees went 1, 2, 3 with the final out a ground out. As the Blue Jays ran off the field, first baseman Carlos Delgado (told you it was a while ago) tossed the ball up into the stands. Many folks went for it, but I came down with it.
I turned to my father-in-law, all smiles. “Here’s your ball, Joe.”
As he looked at the ball, the kids started yelling. “Can we have the ball? Hey, mister, we want that ball. Give us the ball!” “We’ve been yelling,” and so on. My father-in-law turned to me and said, “If you want to give the kids the ball, that’s OK.”
Hells. No.
My father-in-law was a softy. I’m not. And I was not going to give up Joe’s first foul ball in 65 years so some spoiled brats could add it to their collection. Just because you beg for something in an annoying manner does not mean your efforts are rewarded. Learned that while dating in high school.
But some wise guy a few rows behind the kids started a chant. “Give-the-kid-the-ball. Give-the-kid-the-ball.” It picked up steam. “Give! The Kid! The Ball! Give! The Kid! The Ball!” Soon, the whole section was chanting this. GIVE! THE KID! THE BALL! GIVE! THE KID! THE BALL!
I ignored it and tried to watch the game. The kids turned from annoying to nasty. “Hey [mouth-washed-out-with-soap word No. 1]! Give us the ball, [mouth-washed-out-with-soap word No. 2]! He was throwing the ball to us, [mouth-washed-out-with-soap word No. 3, which, frankly, I’m not sure where an 8-to-10-year-old kid would learn].”
We continued to try to watch the game.
Then the food bombardment started. Peanuts, hot dogs and beer were thrown at us. Repeatedly. Security was nowhere to be found. We asked folks to stop, which made it worse. We tried to ignore it. But the food, beer and insults kept coming.
Order was finally restored a half-inning later when the first-base umpire came over and handed the kids some balls. The kids bragged to us. “Told you we’d get a ball, a—hole.”
And that’s why I hate the Yankees.
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
From the Matthew Berry link above.
Reply FAIL by me.
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
i wish i could make that a sig
but it’d clog up so much space.
In one game as a freshman at Miami, Wieters hit a two-run homer in the top of the ninth to put the Yellow Jackets ahead, then pitched the bottom of the ninth for the save. On that day, the God nickname was bestowed. - Sports Illustrated
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions
One day those little shits will propogate
And create something even worse than themselves. That’s the scary part.
(No, I’m not over-dramaticizing anything.)
Thanks to Heath
for the footage of Hobgood. I really enjoyed seeing him at work. Let’s hope that his velocity is good.
I gotta rant about this realignment junk
So, I hear that the plan is to have the officially rebuilding teams shuffle into the AL East while the teams who would have a shot outside of that division get to shuffle into the AL Central (or whatever). So theoretically the Orioles this year would probably be moved into a division with the Twins, Tigers, White Sox, and Rays, while the AL East would probably look like the Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Indians, and Royals.
Um McFly? Hello McFly? Anybody home?
So we’re supposed to just throw our hands up and say “There’s nothing we can do, we surrender” and let the Yankees and Red Sox get the easiest unbalanced schedules from now on by giving them 60 games against all of the rebuilding clubs every single year? No fucking way I could get behind that strategy.
You’d be putting more clubs with more equal footing into one division and telling them that only one of them gets into the playoffs because the Red Sox and Yankees would be able to sew up the wild card by July with that kind of schedule. And of course we want those two clubs in the playoffs every single year from here to eternity. Because that sure hasn’t gotten fucking old already.
Bedard says he doesn't care and thinks goals are pointless.
Yeah
also doesn’t moving teams around to different divisions seem like a much more fundamental change than doing something with a salary cap?
Realignment won't be as hard to get teh players to agree to
A salary cap is a non-started with the MLBPA.
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
non-started = non-starter
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
Hm...
so maybe we could go back to a balanced schedule (or at least a more balanced one)? It might not solve all the problems, but it would sure as hell wouldn’t create as many as this idea would.
by daveh873 on Mar 10, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That should be step 1.
Unbalanced schedule is the absolute worst idea one could inflict upon a sport with as many competitive imbalances as this one.
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
Agreed
It’s totally ridiculous.
One thing someone mentioned to me yesterday when we were talking about re-alignment was the idea of moving teams around in the divisions was similar to how the NFL schedule changes each year for a team based on their previous year’s record. It might be an interesting idea to take that one step further and keep the divisions the same but change the amount of games played against certain teams in other divisions.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
That idea I like.
The WS winner should have the hardest schedule out of the division. Division winners next in line, WC next, etc.
But I still feel that if MLB is looking towards the NFL model of parity they can’t ignore the biggest component.
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
Look
the bottom line is that baseball has a problem: nobody wants to face the Yankees and Red Sox. They charge the most money and have some of the highest payrolls every single year which gives them a distinct advantage over everybody else on the baseball diamond. THAT is the problem.
Re-alignment or shifting the schedule around doesn’t fix that problem at all. It admits that there’s nothing that can be done to stop them and we all need to just work around the idea that the Yankees and Red Sox will always have a distinct advantage over whoever they play. Always and forever.
I don’t expect anything to actually be done. But I haven’t heard any smart ideas that make sense and address the actual problem.
Bedard says he doesn't care and thinks goals are pointless.
"Smart ideas" and "MLB" do not go together.
See: schedule, unbalanced AND play, interleague
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
A balanced schedule
is not “shifting the schedule around”. It’s simply balancing it.
It does plenty to help solve the problem, because if the Yankees had to face the Angels 13 times a year instead of 6 or whatever it is, it would make a difference. And if The Orioles took 6 of our games against the Yankees every year and played the Royals instead, it would make a difference.
Would the Yankees playing more competitive teams and the the Orioles playing more non-competitive teams shake the foundation of baseball? No, but it would automatically make the two teams closer in the standings.
The only way to completely solve the problem is with a salary cap.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
I'm against a salary cap
and definitely for a balanced schedule, but if you have everyone in the AL play everyone else in the AL 12 times each (6 home, 6 away), you’re taking 12 games the Yankees get against Toronto and Baltimore sure, but you’re also taking away 12 games they have to have against Boston and Tampa, and while you’re giving them more games against the Angels and the Twins, you’re also giving them more games against Oakland, Kansas City, and Cleveland. They’d still hold a pretty sizable advantage on the field even with the balanced schedule.
Of course, it would help the other teams in the AL East in terms of win-loss record because they’d be facing more teams that aren’t that good…but they’d still be in direct competition with the Yankees and Red Sox, and they’d still have that distinct advantage on the field. It just wouldn’t be magnified.
But like I said, I’m against a salary cap and have no idea (and haven’t heard any other ideas, really) on how to fix the problem besides letting it play out and dealing with it.
Bedard says he doesn't care and thinks goals are pointless.
I don't really want to have this conversation
I really don’t. But I don’t think a salary cap would really hinder the front offices of the Yankees or the Red Sox (they’d just get smarter and make better decisions…which means no more ridiculous long-term contracts for Jason Giambi or the Mike Lowell extension). And a salary cap would push player salaries down, making the billionaire owners even richer. Ticket prices would still go up, but it would just go directly into the owners’ pockets, instead of spread between players and owners.
Bedard says he doesn't care and thinks goals are pointless.
Eh
I agree with the player salaries/billionaire owners/ticket prices argument, but I don’t see how the Yankees and Red Sox would be able to be smarter than anybody else. Are Cashman and Theo smart? Sure, but even if they were somehow able to consistently outsmart all the other GMs in the league, the margin of difference certainly wouldn’t compare to spending 50% more than the next highest payrolled team.
It is possible
that if a cap were in place, the YankSox would just throw their money at the best and brightest FO people.
sure, but
i’m sure they do that now anyway.
it doesn’t change the fact that the best FO person would no longer be able to just sign whomever he wanted
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
eh
maybe, but seems unlikely. And even if they do – what are they going to hire everybody just to prevent other teams from hiring them? The best and the brightest usually want to be the decision maker or close to it – each team can only have so many guys who actually get to play that role.
True
It’s just a thought. And hey, the best and brightest players usually enjoy being the ace of the staff or the star of the team, but lots of money can make you settle for being a #3 on the Yankees staff.
I’m just saying, if they can’t spend more on players, they’ll spend more on baseball minds and player perks
they’d just get smarter and make better decisions
What? This makes no sense. “We’ll just get smarter.” This implies that somehow Cashman can just take a “smart” pill, and/or that he hasn’t really been paying attention for the past ten years when he signed Giambi to contracts. When he signed Giambi, do you really think he thought, “I don’t care if this is a good decision, I have money to burn.”? No. He thought it WAS smart. A salary cap would expose him.
And a salary cap would push player salaries down, making the billionaire owners even richer. Ticket prices would still go up, but it would just go directly into the owners’ pockets, instead of spread between players and owners.
I don’t believe this is true. A salary cap would allow teams to actually reduce ticket prices to attract more fans in rebuilding years. Smart owners would rather have a larger fanbase for the long term than jack up prices (to the point where nobody comes to the games) just to keep up with the orgy on spending coming out of the northeast.
And I personally don’t care who is making more money between the billionaire owners and millionaire players. The point is, with a salary cap, the Yankees would not be able to bust the bank EVERY SINGLE YEAR as they currently do. That’s the difference. A year where they’d get to sign CC AND Tex AND Burnett wouldn’t exist. If it DID exist, they’d be screwed for the next several years, which would mean other teams would have a chance.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
I'm not going to engage this
because I don’t think we could change each other’s minds, and more importantly because arguing about a salary cap in baseball is akin to arguing about what it would be like if the South won the Civil War. Fun maybe but completely pointless. That shit will never happen.
But I will say this: ticket prices will never go down. That’s not how markets work. And regardless of what owners and GMs say, ticket prices are not related to payroll. Look at the Dodgers, who throw millions of dollars away every year by employing the McCourts’ sons (who don’t actually work for the Dodgers but still receive a stipend) and had a fiscal strategy which involved raising ticket price 90% by 2018 while keeping player payroll more or less steady.
Bedard says he doesn't care and thinks goals are pointless.
Actually
I agree with you about the ticket prices – I don’t think that just because payrolls are lower the owners will lower ticket prices.
But I still don’t get how the rich teams will somehow outsmart the not-so-rich teams once the spending playing field is leveled.
Well, we won't change each others' minds if you're not willing to discuss it for sure
However,
Ticket prices will never go down. That’s not how markets work.
Ticket prices might, however, stay stable. The Orioles’ have for years, whereas the Yankees, after spending a bajillion dollars on new players, jacked up prices to astronomical levels in their new stadium. Of course, some of that is related to W/L records, but some of it is also related to revenues, which themselves are affected by payroll.
And while face value might not ever “go down” (which even that, I don’t agree with…. if there’s enough competition for fans, baseball owners would adjust like anyone else), ticket prices are often reduced in the form of “3 buck night” and other giveaways, which are different ways of reducing them.
That shit will never happen.
I would be shocked if there is not a salary cap in baseball before the end of this decade.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
also
salarycap or not the teams will still spend what they want they will just pay the penalty i mean really what would the penalty be for overspending?
it's not like a tax
in the NFL, you can’t add a player to your roster if his contract would put you over the cap.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
without a salary cap
large market teams will always have a major competitive advantage over small market teams.
period.
there is no way to fix the problem without addressing the economic disparity.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
No other major team sport
Doesn’t have a cap except the NFL for 2010. Maybe there’s a reason for that.
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
by duck on Mar 10, 2010 6:58 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
The Premier League doesn't...
…and it is the most successful soccer league in the world, and bigger than the NHL.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
"bigger than the NHL"
is that the yardstick?
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
No
But if you put it as two of the four biggest sports leagues in the world don’t have a cap, it sure sounds better than “no other major team sport doesn’t have a cap”.
And being bigger than the NHL in a nation of 62,000,000 isn’t too shabby either.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
the economics of baseball vs football (i.e., soccer) are entirely different.
and there is certainly no parity in the premiere league.
where, by the way, the top ticket price is around $60.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
Just remove the divisions
You can still have certain teams match up against each other more often (to maintain rivalrys) but the top 4 teams from the AL and NL make the playoffs, or maybe add another WC and top 5 make it.
"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law
by Reddrummer9187 on Mar 10, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
this.
This would solve a ton of problems.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
it's not a non-starter now that fehr is gone
the owners would have to get solidly behind it. if they did, the players would have no choice.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
We'd have another strike
Guaranteed
"The moment you stop thinking you're the best, it's time for you to get out the game." -'King' Mo Lawal
by duck on Mar 10, 2010 7:11 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
absolutely. and then the strike would end. with a salary cap.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
A-effing-men.
What’s really telling is that Selig is even willing to talk about something as gimmicky as a “rolling realignment”, which is basically another way to offer up different sacrificial lambs to the Sawx & Yanks every year while letting Tampa Bay, Toronto, and Baltimore take turns feeling better about themselves as they compete in the AL “West” or “Central”. But beyond the token luxury tax (or whatever it’s called) they levy against NYY every year while pretending it’s some kind of deterrent, the fans everywhere else get jack squat.
Because we all know that the best way to solve any problem is to merely pawn the symptoms off on someone else.
And I’m sure NYY & BOS won’t mind having the doormats of a weaker division volunteer to surrender large chunks of their schedule to those two rotisserie rosters in the name of a larger take at the turnstiles.
Fuck. Baseball is broken & they’re trying to make it brokenER.
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
Re-alignment is nice in theory
I mean, sure I wouldn’t mind playing the Royals 18 times a year instead of the Yankees, but yeah, revolving it around two teams is ridiculous. So we’re all just assuming that the Red Sox and Yankees are going to be the big mean dominant winners at the top of the division every year forever? No thanks.
Besides that, personally I’d prefer to stay in the AL East. Baltimore has been in the AL East since there has been an AL East and that’s where we belong.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
You're too generous
Realignment is NOT nice in theory. It’s a stupid idea all around.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
lol maybe "theory" wasn't the right word
What I meant was, it’s nice to think about a world where we get to play sucky teams 18 times a year and be in a division with them. There is at least one time every baseball season where I, in the moment, wish the Orioles were in another division and curse the unfairness of it all. But in reality I wouldn’t want it to happen.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
I wonder how many people here at CC
are old enough to remember the balanced schedule. It was a far more interesting game then, because you acutally got to know all the teams. It was better for baseball.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
When I was a kid...
…we played the Brewers! And they were in the AL! We didn’t have no stinkin’ Rockies or Diamonwhatevers with all the Fish! It was uphill, too! And we liked it that way!
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
Yeah!
Detroit was in our division, too!
And we had to read the Evening Sun to get complete box scores!
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
You know what I liked when I was a kid
If a game ran too late or if it was a west coast game I would always wake up in the morning and first thing call the Baltimore Sun hotline to listen to the recorded voice give me the score and highlights.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
Huh.
I always ran out to get the paper first thing in the morning so I could see if the cartoon bird was happy or sad. I didn’t know there was a hotline.
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
oh, yeah, the ORIGINAL cartoon bird.
those were the days.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
no it was only if the game went too late to make the morning paper
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
then the full article would be in the evening sun
but the hotline would give you enough to get through the day.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
and of course you could get a slightly different angle from the News-American
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
Well that was a little before my time
When did it stop publication, sometime in the 80s I think. I remember when the Evening Sun stopped coming out, I was in high school.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
balanced schedule wasn't that long ago
We played all teams in the AL roughly 12 times each until 2000 (modified slightly to accommodate interleague). 18 times per year against teams in the division started in 2001.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
Seems like forever.
Then again, so does this string of losing seasons…
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
didn't realize it was so recent.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
don't quote me on this
because I’m not totally certain, but I think the NL has been playing an unbalanced schedule much longer. It used to be one of the differences in the leagues.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
actually based on baseball reference
It looks like the NL started unbalanced in 1999. so not MUCH longer.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
Hmm.
That’s a good point – if that’s the assumption, why wouldn’t you split up the Yankees & the BoSox? Rather than make everyone else move, why wouldn’t you move the dubbed “perennial powers” around?
Turn the AL into a two division league, put the Yanks in one & the Sox in another. Make them beat out 5 or 6 teams for the title, give each division two WC spots. You get two division titlists, and 4 wild card teams.
WC play-in = 3 game series (division leaders BYE)
WC playoff = 5 games
Divisional = 5 games
World Series = 7 games
You get an extra team in the playoffs every year, which creates at least the appearance of greater parity. The short series in the WC play in round allows the possibility that a weaker team could advance to the next round, lending more to that appearance.
This is more like the NFL model, again. And it ignores the payroll disparity. But it makes more sense than shuffling teams around randomly every year.
From the Land of Pleasant Living...
Mike Flanagan is officially Buck Martinez's replacement.
http://masnsports.com/2010/03/flanny-on-board.html
Weaver's Fourth Law: Your most precious possessions on offense are your twenty-seven outs.
Nomar retires
Here’s an interesting tidbit. From Rob Neyer.
What we didn’t know was that Garciaparra had a wrist injury. A serious injury. In 2001, he didn’t play until late July, struggled in 21 games and shut things down for the rest of the season. There was a surgery, and it was “successful” … but Garciaparra would never again be that player, never again a threat to win a batting title or an MVP award.
If I remember correctly, Al Reyes, an Oriole at the time, is the player who caused Nomar’s wrist injury, thus altering Nomar’s trajectory toward the Hall of Fame. I remember watching the game where Reyes plucked Nomar flush on the wrist. As Neyer points out, Nomar played through the injury for the rest of the season before missing most of the next season. Such a shame, I like Nomar and I’m going to miss his Rain Man routine with his gloves before each at bat.
Bruce Springsteen rules.
He was so good
I remember one game where he hit three dingers, two of them grand slams.
cxcxcxcxzzzzzzzzz
And I could be wrong, but I believe Pedro Martinez retaliated by nailing Brady Anderson in the back. And I remember this beaning vividly because normally when someone gets beaned in the back. They grimace a bit and then take their base. But Brady looked like it he got shot. He went down like Willem DaFoe from Platoon. And I don’t think Brady was trying to be dramatic.
Bruce Springsteen rules.
Just two days later
Not sure if the Nomar was the reasoning for the HBP, but reading this recap from The Sun really make me like Ray Miller:
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1999-09-28/sports/9909280046_1_anderson-martinez-miller
Ray Miller was a terrible manager but I liked the following quote from him.
“He’s jawing at Brady as Brady’s walking away. The skinny little--. I’ve been watching him do it for 10 years. He doesn’t have the [guts] to walk up to anybody’s face. All he does is run behind everybody. He might be a good pitcher but he’s a [jerk].”
Bruce Springsteen rules.
…no more. …no mah.
Fixed.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
What the shirt I suggested yesterday could look like
In one game as a freshman at Miami, Wieters hit a two-run homer in the top of the ninth to put the Yellow Jackets ahead, then pitched the bottom of the ninth for the save. On that day, the God nickname was bestowed. - Sports Illustrated
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Mar 10, 2010 5:07 PM EST reply actions
was there a thread about t-shirts yesterday that i missed?
also, “width=400” is your friend.
"I doubt he could reach [second base]...mostly cuz his fucking arm was in Aybar's nuts." – twistedlogic
Just a few comments
In yesterdays open thread
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873
by Stacey on Mar 10, 2010 6:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
an idea I had for CC-related shirt


"I'd like to do something. We all would here," he added. "As I've said before, you just don't want to do anything stupid that you're thinking in May, 'What in the God's green earth was I thinking about?'" - Andy MacPhail 12/8/09
MacPhail on the competitive imbalance, from Steve Melewski:
“We went to Yankee Stadium last year and they are charging $2,400 for a box seat. And they only sell a third of them, but they are still making a ton of money, more than others, just selling one of three. I find that repugnant to be honest with you.”
Repugnant. MacPhail is awesome.
Weaver's Fourth Law: Your most precious possessions on offense are your twenty-seven outs.
i remember that quote
The fact that he used repungant made it a great quote.
In one game as a freshman at Miami, Wieters hit a two-run homer in the top of the ninth to put the Yellow Jackets ahead, then pitched the bottom of the ninth for the save. On that day, the God nickname was bestowed. - Sports Illustrated
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Mar 10, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
Cal Ripken declaring his serious interest in managing now:
1. “Waiting for my kids to go through school” Translates to “Waiting for the Orioles to actually develop a respectable farm system and team” (KIDDING! NO ONE TALKS SHIT ABOUT RIPKEN) [But I did just say that.]
2. Dave Trembley receiving a kiss of death…
Thinking that Cal as Orioles manager will probably be years away
Would make sense that he’d start with the Ironbirds (where he could just hire himself) just to make sure he likes it/is good at it.
yeah, that would be nice if you don't have to worry about getting fired.
In one game as a freshman at Miami, Wieters hit a two-run homer in the top of the ninth to put the Yellow Jackets ahead, then pitched the bottom of the ninth for the save. On that day, the God nickname was bestowed. - Sports Illustrated
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Mar 10, 2010 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
I really hope we wouldn't seriously consider installing him immediately as manager
I’m sure with the family history and all he is a lot more prepared than a lot of ex-players, but (i think Stacey brought this up in an interview at one point) I’d really hate to see him take over the orioles and fail. Its hard to see that not tarnishing his legacy in Baltimore some.
Ideally we’d put him on the the Ryne Sandberg plan, who’s probably gonna take over in Chicago when Pinella leaves.
on the other hand..
I’d hate to see us wait so long that he’d manage another team. That’d just be weird.
I really cant imagine this would be the case
But i think it would be prudent to have him, for his sake and ours, take over delmarva or bowie for a little while to make sure its something he can and wants to do.
There are not enough curse words in the world
to describe how much I hate Comcast.
This just in: adorableness on the rise, family copes with child getting schooled. Film at 11. -daveh873

by 


















