Analyzing Brian Matusz's First Start
Ok, so this is the first time I've ever attempted to talk about this kind of stuff, so forgive me if I stumble a bit. My new friend over at DRaysBay provided me with the data and some basic info, and this is a learn as I go process.
I think we're all happy to know that Brian Matusz is pitching tonight. Matusz owns the only Orioles win on the season, a five inning effort (four of which were impressive). Even the 3rd inning, in which Matusz started by walking the bases loaded, resulted in only two runs as he recovered relatively well. All told Matusz walked 5 and struck out 7, and I feel comfortable saying that I don't believe he'll walk that many again.
Below the jump you'll find the breakdown of Matusz's pitches from his first start against the Rays. It'll be interesting to compare to his results tonight against the same team.

(click any of the graphics in this article to see a larger version)
Matusz relied mostly on his fastball, throwing either the two-seam or four-seam 67 times out of 97 pitches. Given the vertical movement of his FB it makes sense. His average velocity is in line with what we saw from him last year, and given the high swinging strike % of his changeup and curveball he was able to use them effectively against the fastball (except of course when he couldn't get them over the plate).
Throwing 43% of his pitches for balls obviously isn't good and certainly isn't what we expect from Matusz. I'd expect to see that percentage drop tonight. To contrast the disappointing amount of balls is the fact that the Rays put only 8 balls in play against Matusz in the game (2 singles, 4 flyballs, 1 pop up, and 1 line out). With numbers like that, if Matusz had been able to control the walks he could have been dominant.
First of all, I'm not sure what that slider is. Does Matusz throw a slider? Given the lack of movement on the two this data says he threw, I'm guessing they were actually curveballs gone wrong. Matusz threw both his two and four seam fastballs with better than average movement but had trouble with the curve (11 of 14 were balls). His changeup, which he also had some trouble throwing for a strike, was just about average. (For more information on pitch movement, see this article at The Hardball Times)
Finally, let's look at individual pitch location.
The thing that jumps out the most (again) is the high amount of pitches that were balls. For the most part he missed in the same location all night. Down and away to lefties, down and in to righties. The Rays also fouled off a bunch of pitches in the strike zone, it'd be nice if he could drop that relatively high number down and increase his swinging strike %. A few more instances of solid contact on those foul balls and this could have been a different ball game.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's supposed to have a slider
Supposedly he has the two fastballs, the curve, the slider, and the change. The curve he supposedly throws at 75-79 and the slider at 79-83. But it would be weird if he had one and only threw it to righties (well, out of character with how traditionally pitchers use the slider primarily to same-handed batters and the change primarily to opposite-handed batters).
Interestingly, Matusz didn’t get a single groundball out in his first start.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
About that last stat James...
Saw this over at fangraphs, looks like our outfielders should get used to those fly balls. IMO I’d say this only strengthens the case for Pie at LF due to his athleticism, and teaching either Nolan or Luke how to play first.
“The Orioles outfielders are going to get a workout this year.
Here are the GB% for Baltimore starters so far:
Kevin Millwood: 37.5%
Jeremy Guthrie: 34.1%
Brad Bergesen: 42.1%
Brian Matusz: 0.0%
David Hernandez: 11.8%
Matusz and Hernandez continued their trend established in 2009 of being extreme flyball pitchers in their 2010 debuts. Chris Tillman is also an extreme flyball guy, so interestingly, the Orioles crop of young arms is made up almost entirely of guys who ptich up in the zone and give up balls in the air. Millwood and Guthrie are about average groundball guys for their careers, so the outfield will only get to rest on days when Bergsen takes the hill."
Yeah, I saw that too...
…sure seems odd of the Fangraphs guys to forget the meaning of small sample size.
Hernandez is a career extreme flyball pitcher, and we should expect that to continue. Matusz as well has a strong fly ball tendency but he still has lees than 50 innings of major league data; I dunno how much that data is worth. Bergy had a 50.1% groundball rate last season and his minor league numbers back that up. And Millwood and Guthrie have a ton of data, and have groundball rates of 43.1% and 40.2% for their careers (although Guthrie did have a 34.7% groundball rate last year, and could be trending away from his career average).
So, yes, to a degree, this is an issue. But it isn’t as big an issue as the Fangraphs numbers suggest, IMO. That said, it does suggest that we should consider sacrificing some infield defense for offense – say by putting Scott at first so we can have him, Reimold, and Pie in the lineup at the same time.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
GB% is important
But how hard the are being hit is just as important. If he’s forcing a bunch of lazy fly balls then it can be seen that the hitters are struggling and thats a good thing.
"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law
by Reddrummer9187 on Apr 13, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I haven't heard of Matusz throwing a slider
I’m thinking they’re flat curves, which is basically what a slider is. He’s always had 4 pitches, 2 seam, 4 seam, curve and change.
I like going to the Brooks PFX tool. It looks like he was heavily leaning on his fastballs.
I want to breed [Matusz] with that female Japanese knuckleballer to create a race of super pitchers. --Weaver's Tantrum
Give us More, Stacey
Interesting stuff. I love the TIC sarcasm that you use so well. Without that it is pretty grim reading anything about the O’s!

by 
























