It Was A Good Draft...
...just not the one I wanted.
The Orioles made a pick that is impossible to argue with in the first round, selecting prep shortstop Manny Machado. While I have my reservations about Machado, he was the consensus best available talent in that spot, offering the possibility of plus defense and offense from a premium defensive position.
However, Machado is years away. A Boras client, it is doubtful that he will sign before the mid-August deadline, making it unlikely that he will face any real competition this year. Only three months older than Bryce Harper, the seventeen year old Machado will be too young for the Orioles to send him to the Arizona Fall League, meaning we won't even get to see him play in a competitive minor league environment until 2011.
As all of us are aware by now, the Orioles lacked a second round pick due to the signing of Mike Gonzalez, a Type A free agent. To put that loss into perspective, here are some of the top prospects drafted in between the third pick of the second round and our third round pick: Brett Eibner, Brandon Workman, Jedd Gyorko, Yordy Cabrera, Reggie Golden, Jarrett Parker, and Mel Rojas Jr. Several of these names were widely considered to be first round talents.
The Orioles made an interesting pick in round three, selecting UCLA closer Dan Klein. Klein has an advanced four pitch repertoire and the Orioles have announced that they plan on using him as a starter. Klein has the stuff to be a Jake Arrieta type - a big fastball and quality secondary offerings. His history of shoulder trouble, however, leads to concerns about his durability.
In the fourth round, the Orioles selected Auburn center fielder Trent Mummey, who is reportedly close to signing. Mummey is a classic Jordan pick - a somewhat undersized speedy center fielder with strong defense. Two years ago, Jordan drafted a similar player in Kyle Hudson, also in the fourth round, now with Frederick. The year before that, Jordan drafted another similar player, Matt Angle, in the seventh round, who is now with Norfolk. Jordan hasn't had tremendous success, however, drafting this type of player. Hudson has a career minor league OPS of .651, which Angle tops by an even .100 at .751, and neither makes especially solid contact.
The selection in the fifth round was prep shortstop Connor Narron, son of Jerry Narron, and represented the Orioles first tough sign after the first round. Narron is probably a third baseman going forward, with a plus arm that plays at the position and a promising bat with both contact and power potential. This pick was also very typical of Jordan, reminiscent of Michael Ohlman last season and LJ Hoes in 2008 - a prep bat with good all around offensive potential but lacking any single standout offensive tool and a lack of a certain defensive home.
In the sixth and seventh round, Jordan went for arms, selecting college righty Dixon Anderson and college lefty Matt Bywater. Bywater ought to remind Orioles fans of Richard Zagone, taken in the sixth round two years ago out of Mizzou. Zagone, like Bywater, lacks premium stuff but has adequate velocity from the left side with a plus offspeed pitch. Anderson, a draft-eligible sophomore with a good body and velocity but command problems, has some breakout potential.
The eighth round selection, prep backstop Wynston Sawyer, is very reminiscent of last year's selection Ohlman - another catcher with strong offense for the position and questionable defensive tools whose stock rose close to the draft but whose defensive questions led to his not going until midway through day two. Like Ohlman, Sawyer has the potential to be a fast riser through the prospect ranks with his bat, but will quickly lose value if he cannot prove himself behind the plate. Sawyer, like Narron and Anderson, will require an overslot bonus, although probably less than Ohlman demanded last season.
In the tenth round, the Orioles nabbed Clay Schrader, a strong bullpen arm reminiscent of last year's selections of James Brandhorst and Kevin Landry. Schrader has more velocity and upside than either Branhorst or Landry, but still profiles as a bullpen arm, as he lacks a changeup.
Deeper in the draft class, Jordan grabbed several arms with upside who are major signability questions at their draft position, with preps Austin Urban and Jaime Esquivel and JuCo Joe Robinson. Like with years past, expect Jordan to sign at least one of the three to an overslot deal. All represent very good value for their draft position, although none are the equivalent of Cameron Coffey last season.
This is a very solid draft class. Throughout the later rounds, Jordan found players who were solid value for their draft position. It is also not a cheap class; in addition to the high-priced Machado, Narron, Anderson, Sawyer, and the late round prep arms will all require overslot deals, and Jordan has already clearly stated that he expects the club to sign Narron, who projects as the most expensive of the lot.
So why I am I not thrilled with this draft?
Partially, because of what I said at the top - it is a good draft, but not the one that I wanted. That's probably a good thing - Jordan and his team are much, much better at this than I am. Throughout the first fifteen rounds, however, we left higher ceiling talent on the table. In round four, we took Mummey while players like Kyle Blair went to the Indians and Garin Cecchini went to the Red Sox. In round six, we took Anderson while Jesse Hahn went to the Rays and Kevin Gausmann went to the Dodgers. In the 18th round, we selected the excellently named Sebastian Vader, while the Blue Jays selected Kris Bryant and the Braves took Zach Alvord.
The players who I named will all cost a great deal more to sign than our draftees, and several may not sign at all. And there is no guarantee that they will be successful prospects, much less successful big leaguers. But in the 2009 season, 80% of the Wins Above Replacement were generated by only 15% of the players. And by and large, those wins came from a consistent group of the most talented players in the game. Baseball is a game decided largely by the stars, not by the role players who contribute around the edges. And while we got one of the highest ceiling prospects in the draft in Machado, outside of him we added few names who seem likely to become premium talents.
Something that concerns me less than I suspect will others is the excellent draft classes by several of our AL East rivals, particularly the Red Sox, Jays, and Rays. Toronto and Tampa Bay had excellent drafts, to be sure. But both teams had among the most disastrous drafts in baseball in 2009, failing to sign several top picks, which is a part of why they had so many early picks in 2010. Both classes also look better now than I expect them to at the signing deadline; I expect both teams to sign their top picks, but both teams will have to change their spending radically to sign many of their picks from the middle rounds. Given the depth of our 2009 class and the weakness of theirs, I feel like we still come out even or ahead of both clubs, although they closed the gap much closer than I would like. Meanwhile, although the Red Sox didn't have the problems in 2009 that the Rays and Jays experienced, this is more of a typical draft for them, and while it is quite good this is what we have to expect. Further, the Boston system has been riddled with injuries and the stock of many of their healthy prospects, such as Michael Bowden, has fallen this year.
What I am concerned by is the extent to which Jordan appears to be falling into a specific draft pattern. Trent Mummey is a fine fourth round pick, but is extremely similar to players recently drafted and who have not worked out for us. In a system devoid of power hitters, this was the one element that our draft lacked. Recent Jordan draftees selected for their power bats have not succeeded to date, from Bill Rowell to Tyler Townsend, last year's third round pick. The only power bats successfully developed under Jordan have been Matt Wieters and Nolan Reimold; our best power bats currently in our system are Josh Bell and Brandon Waring, both acquired via trade.
That said, it is striking how thoroughly Jordan has addressed our prior weakness up the middle. With the additions of Machado and Narron to Mychal Givens and Garabez Rosa, we should have strong depth in middle infield prospects in our low minors. Behind Caleb Joseph, we now have excellent prospect catching depth with Ohlman, Justin Dalles and Sawyer. These aspects, deep weaknesses of our system over the last decade which led in part to debacles like Paul Bako and Luis Hernandez should, over time, become strengths. Jordan continues to provide us with a strong and broad base of pitching, which should continue to provide the Orioles with a deep pool of pitching prospects throughout the minors. And everything about our draft class shows that Peter Angelos continues to be willing for the Orioles to be among the top half of the league in draft spending.
Another year, another good draft by Jordan and company. But yet again, another draft that does not appear to be all that it could have been. And for a team that is both as bad as the Orioles and in such a competitive division, the question has to be whether good is enough to succeed.
34 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent summary, James. Thanks for all your draft coverage.
I’m glad to see an emphasis being placed on ‘up the middle’ depth. With the steroid era past, good pitching and solid defense is an imperative. It seems the Warehouse has done a good job addressing the dearth of talent in both areas recently. The next phase then, is to ‘buy the bats’.
thanks James
Great work as usual. I share your wish for the O’s to use early picks on potential power hitters instead of tweener CF prospects.
by Dingbat Charlie on Jun 11, 2010 11:32 AM EDT reply actions
In Jordan's defense...
….this was a very weak draft for power hitters. I can’t really blame Jordan for not reaching to get one of the few decent ones when there were better talents out there.
But in that sense, missing out on Bryant who didn’t go until the 18th to Toronto, hurts. He’s probably unsignable, especially in that draft position. And maybe the O’s scouts saw things in Bryant they didn’t think could be fixed. But it would have been nice to grab one of the only guys in the class with plus to plus-plus raw power in that position.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
also
most of the pubs I read don’t hate the Mummey pick in that spot, so I’m trying to dislike that pick less.
by Dingbat Charlie on Jun 11, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree...
…it isn’t a bad pick for the draft position. My questions about it are more along the lines of why a player so similar to other players in our system at a position where we have great depth already. But he’s both a decent value in the fourth round, and seemingly quite an easy sign. And although I’m no scout, his swing looks better than Angle’s to me.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
A not too serious answer - the blind squirrel theory
Given enough attempts, they say even a blind squirrel finds a nut. Perhaps Jordan thinks that one of these days he’s going to get the next Kenny Lofton (who is the only small stature, defensive oriented CF that immediately comes to mind).
Rec by the way.
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
How was Kirby Puckett's defense?
I honestly can’t remember.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
He made that one incredible catch.
That’s about all I know about his defense.
Rub some $100 bills on it, you sell-out. -duck
According to TotalZone,
-1 run per year. Below-average range mostly balanced out by a good arm.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all." -- Earl Weaver
And thanks to you and everyone for the kind words.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
Nice work
Because I knew we didnt have a 2nd, I tried not to think about it. Having the 3rd overall helps ease that a bit. Overall I am pleased.
FYI – O’s agree to terms with 15 draft picks per the Sun
Thanks, I hadn't seen that yet
I’m shocked that John Shelby’s kid signed already, aren’t you? ;)
By the way, is anyone else amused that our 26th round pick has almost the same name as Obama economic adviser (and excellent research economist) Austan Goolsbee?
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
Good stuff, as always
I hate to echo everybody else’s sentiment, but I definitely appreciate the time/work that you put into this.
My thoughts:
- This draft hinges on Machado, who was the right pick, and frankly an easy one. He’ll be a difficult sign – or at least it’ll be dragged out until 8/15, but I bet a good amount of the budget goes to him. He better deliver
- I like the Narron pick too
- As long as they sign some of the overslot high school (or the juco) kids, then I’m fine with the draft
- I’m not too too worried about the Angle/Hudson/Mummey line of thinking…as the game shifts toward defense, it seems to make some sense to take a stab on those kinds of kids. I mean, did anyone really think Angle would ever make it to AAA? He is essentially a great defender with a keen eye, and he’s parlayed that into AAA. He could be a useful 4th OF, at least if he can OBP in the majors at a 340 clip.
Librarians are hiding something
My hope for Angle...
…is that he can be similar to Reggie Willits of the Angels, only with better defense but not a switch-hitter.
That said, most people I’ve talked to don’t agree, because they think Angle doesn’t make good enough contact. I keep harping on Angle’s groundball rate, but to put the difference into perspective, Willits had a groundball percentage of 49.2% in the minor leagues. Angle has a career 63.4%, and it isn’t getting better – combined this year between Bowie and Norfolk, he’s hitting 73.1% of batted balls on the ground.
So I just can’t see him being a useful major leaguer, even as a fourth outfielder. Pitchers will simply pound the zone on him, as he can’t even make great contact on fastballs down the middle. I’d like to be wrong, but I have yet to find a single useful major league player with Angle’s penchant for hitting balls on the ground.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
I think the part I liked best ....
… was where you say “Peter Angelos continues to be willing for the Orioles to be among the top half of the league in draft spending”
Clarence, It's better to have a gun and not need it, then need a gun and not have it.
Always good to read your analyses, James.
Two things:
First: I really, really hate how players will wait until the signing deadline so they can squeeze out a little more money. Seriously? You’re already going to make way more than anyone your age should be making. Take the first decent offer and go out there and work on the game you’re being paid to play.
The other, I think I brought up in another thread a while ago, but it didn’t start any discussion, and I’m still curious what others think.
Jordan’s approach seems pretty logical, and meshes well with MacPhail’s grow-arms-buy-bats philosophy. Raw, toolsy guys with speed [and decent on-base skills] are good to have, even though you need some sluggers in there too. But speed goes away with age, while power often comes later.
So doesn’t it make more sense to focus on drafting raw/toolsy/fast guys (whom you can keep for cheap until they start losing their speed) and pitchers (who are very volatile and thus not the best to invest lots of money in) while trading for and spending money on established sluggers?
Obviously, the problem is that we have yet to actually get any established sluggers. But last offseason’s free agents were not terribly appealing in that regard, so I’m not holding that against MacPhail. (I do not, however, give him a pass on Atkins or the loss of a draft pick for Gonzalez.) If we don’t get a serious power bat next offseason — say, Adam Dunn — then I’ll start getting unhappy.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all." -- Earl Weaver
Well don't forget
Selig won’t approve most over slot deals until 8/15. So for someone like narron a deal could already be in place but both parties have to wait until the deadline to announce it.
"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law
by Reddrummer9187 on Jun 11, 2010 5:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
So
if they’re making more than slot money, they have to wait that long anyway? I didn’t know that.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all." -- Earl Weaver
heres a link
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6545
Question: So where are we at right now in terms of the 2007 draft?
With 10 days to go before the newly-implemented signing deadline of August 15, 13 of the 30 first-round picks, including eight of the first 12 picks are still without a deal. In addition, there are 26 players between the supplemental first round and the fifth round who are also officially unsigned.
Question: Wait a second—what do you mean by "official?"
There appear to be plenty of deals where all the terms have been agreed upon, but they’re just not signed and announced yet. All of these deals include bonuses that are far greater than the slot recommended by MLB. For example, Detroit has signed fifth-round pick Casey Crosby for what is believed to be $750,000; rumors abound that Atlanta has agreed to terms with first-rounder Jason Heyward for approximately $1.7 million, and the Yankees have agreed on several above-slot deals, including around $1 million for fourth-round pick Brad Suttle, and somewhere between $750-900,000 for tenth-round pick Carmen Angelini.
Question: So why aren’t these deals announced yet?
On the surface, because MLB doesn’t want the over-slot deals being used in negotiations to raise the bonus demands of the legitimately unsigned picks. That said, it’s an exercise in futility. "Once a deal is done, everyone knows it’s out there," said one scouting director; teams talk to each other, and agents quickly let their good deals be known. As another scouting director put it, "I really don’t know who they think they are fooling."
"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law
by Reddrummer9187 on Jun 11, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Huh.
Yeah, and I guess that you can’t start working out within a team’s organization until you’re officially signed. Bah, that’s dumb.
"You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the damn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all." -- Earl Weaver
James F, you're my hero!
This is the kind of analysis I’ve been waiting for. It’s kind of rare to see in-depth articles so quickly, so thank you.
It got me to researching last year’s draft picks, and seeing what they did last year. One puzzle I can’t solve, though, and I hope someone here can help me out: where is Michael Flacco this year? I can’t find him on anybody’s roster. It looks like he started his professional career at Bluefield and was promoted to Delmarva for, like, two games (is that right?). But he’s not on Delmarva’s roster this year or, as far as I can tell, anyone else’s. Does anyone know?
"MONTANEZ: Alas! I cannot hit. Deal with it."
-Eat More Esskay
As usual, I should have just used the google.
I see he had a stress fracture in his back last September. And I saw someone’s suggestion in March that he’ll maybe play for short-season Aberdeen this year.
"MONTANEZ: Alas! I cannot hit. Deal with it."
-Eat More Esskay
Thanks, great post!
Does anybody have a link that lists MLB’s recommended slot bonuses? I’d be curious to see that.
Technically, those are supposed to be confidential...
…even from other teams, so I doubt that anyone has the master list.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
Good analysis James
This didn’t sound like an extremely deep draft so while I wish we had gotten more, I am not concerned. Next year we better get a haul though.
"I have seen the future and his name is Matt Wieters." Keith Law
by Reddrummer9187 on Jun 12, 2010 10:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Serious question for James
Why do you like the Orioles’ 2009 draft?
Well, I say why in the article
But to recap: they got the third best player in the class in Machado. They got an arm without a lot of mileage on it with upside in Klein. They continued to spend on overslot players at key defensive positions in Sawyer and Narron. They continue to stockpile quality arms of a variety of talents.
It is a draft that doesn’t inspire a lot of excitement, but it shouldn’t inspire anger either. But what I do like is that the O’s scouting department has a plan and they clearly believe in it. They lack a certain creativity and vision that I would like to see. But they do a solid job, and that’s more than I can say for a lot of teams, and more than I can say for a lot of recent regimes in Baltimore.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
I said 2009. I understand your thoughts on 2010.
by AndrewTorrez on Jun 22, 2010 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions
You're right, I'm sorry
I liked the 2009 draft because the Orioles were ambitious about adding a broad base of talent, and made good use out of a large number of picks.
You and I probably both can question the Hobgood pick, leaving better talent on the table. But Hobgood was a sure first round arm; to say he isn’t Tyler Matzek doesn’t make him not one of the top ten arms of his class. Givens is a nice pick with upside both in the field and if that doesn’t pan out, in the bullpen. Townsend went a round or two early, but he has some pop and ability with the bat. Arms like Henry, Tolliver, Brandhorst, Berry, Wirsch, Cowan, Baker and Coffey all had talent and upside – few teams have ever had draft classes so deep in promising arms. And Ohlman, Hoppy and Webb are all promising bats with upside adding to the depth of this class.
A lot of these guys have struggled in the minors so far. But only a couple of them have to reach their potential for this to be a big win, since all of them have upside for their draft position. Ryan Berry has been superb so far this year; he was a ninth round pick. Henry has had all kinds of problems, but he’s also shown electric stuff. Outside of the Hobgood pick, 2009 was pretty much a model draft, or would have been if everyone had been signed.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa
you're essentially conceding
that the first 4 picks of 2009 were overdrafts. That’s … not good.
by AndrewTorrez on Jun 23, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
No I'm not
Givens and Henry were drafted where they were supposed to – Givens actually fell to get to the second round.
To be understood is to be a prostitute. ~ Fernando Pessoa

by 





















