Two amendments to the 40 Greatest Orioles list
You'll recall that I put together a 40 Greatest Orioles of All-Time list last offseason. I don't want to re-do the whole thing this year, but I did want to make some changes, and figured I could do it in a quick and dirty format.
Off -- Jeff Conine (#40 last time)
40. Gregg Olson
39. Brian Roberts
Recent allegations aside, I don't care. I've got Palmeiro and Tejada on here. Roberts had another really good season this year, his second truly ace year, and he's been serviceable two other seasons. He's still in his prime and if he stays in Baltimore, would have made the list after 2008, most likely, and higher than this. He bumps off Conine, who gave us more years, but Roberts is a Baltimore Oriole. He's been a fan favorite since becoming a regular, and someone I think we all genuinely like. I'm not saying he's the best player ever, but it's my list, I can be biased.
- Roberto Alomar
- Harold Baines
- Mike Boddicker
- BJ Surhoff
- Tippy Martinez
- Dick Hall
- Rick Dempsey
- Hoyt Wilhelm
- Mike Flanagan
- Melvin Mora
- Steve Barber
- Scott McGregor
- Luis Aparicio
- Don Buford
- Chris Hoiles
23. Miguel Tejada
Tejada jumps from #39 as his time in Baltimore ends. I wanted to be cautious last year with Miggi, but now that it's over and can be put into perspective, he did a lot more in his four seasons with the Birds than most guys could have in ten. It's not his fault the teams sucked, and in time, I'll forget that he complained so much because -- again -- I would have, too, if I'd come here as a marquee free agent assured that the team was going to build a contender around me, then blatantly failed to do so. He was a hell of a player for us. Had he stayed, I think it's likely he'd have jumped into the top 15, though age and decline likely would've topped him out at a spot behind Palmeiro.
- Jim Gentile
- Davey Johnson
- Mark Belanger
- Stu Miller
- Al Bumbry
- Gus Triandos
- Doug DeCinces
- Paul Blair
- Milt Pappas
- Rafael Palmeiro
- Bobby Grich
- Mike Cuellar
- Ken Singleton
- Brady Anderson
- Dave McNally
- Mike Mussina
- Boog Powell
- Frank Robinson
- Eddie Murray
- Jim Palmer
- Brooks Robinson
- Cal Ripken, Jr.
I don't think it'll be too long until Nick Markakis rightfully makes this list. And if Bedard stays around, he's got a good shot, too.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
is there a reason why you don't make it...
(I do like dev and inky though)
by dfleis on Dec 15, 2007 8:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Fifty would be nice, but number one.......
by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 1:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
re:
This is, without fail, one of the stupidest arguments I can ever hear, every single time I hear it. Sorry, I cannot be convinced to buy into the idea that a guy can be more valuable than playing to the best of his ability just because the other 24 dudes on his team do or do not suck as a whole.
But you're right, let's take a shit on Cal Ripken for being one of the greatest shortstops to ever live.
Thanks for the time that you've given me...
by SC on Dec 17, 2007 7:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I applaud you
by Stacey on Dec 17, 2007 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, please.......
And it's a stupid arguement about winning the MVP for a last place team? Is that what I read??? How stupid can you get? The award says "Most VALUABLE Player". How valuable was he? I think they still could finished in last place without him. You say don't penalize him because the team around him sucks? My God, there was no pressure because the team was terrible. He didnt have to come up in late September with runners on, two out and the East title on the line. He didnt have to worry about advancing the runner or giving himself up. Even a quick look at his stats in the other years I mnentioned shows he failed when he had a chance to be valuable when he was needed. You think if he had performed like this in 1989 the O's might have actually pulled it off? Remember, Eddie was gone and it fell to Ripken to lead the team, AND HE FAILED MISERABLY!!!!!
Don't be so hard headed and close minded to just coronate this guy just becsue he played in a lot of games in a row. Think, for bleep's sake...THINK!
by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
MVP
You're just using the more Catholic definition of the MVP award. Some people argue that a MVP award must go to someone on a winning team, other people argue that there are mitigating circumstances which should allow the award to go to someone on a losing team. You seem to fall into the former camp. In the end, who cares in regards to what we're discussing. Cal's 91 season was outstanding. OPS+ of 162 for a SS no less. If you believe that the MVP winner must come from a winning team, fine, but don't deny that Cal's 91 was remarkable.
by birdman on Dec 17, 2007 7:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude you are a Freak
Now heres where you pissed me off - #33 was one of the best players to ever where an O's uniform ( Not saying the best, that would be the fan in me) but easy top 5 or 6. I think the top 10 here is pretty close to what most would say.
by merdon1332000 on Dec 17, 2007 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Who's your top ten?
Aw, and I pissed off the poor baby? Eddie was clearly better than Ripken and surely a top two player. Only Brooks meant more to this organization.
I agree, the streak helped get the game back on track, much like the great HR chase a few years later. I just think and I will keep saying it, look at his whole body of work before he's made king of the world! He had a marvelous career, no doubt and if any of you knuckleheads think I'm saying he didn't, you're the freak. But just look and analyze his numbers.
If he had said once, just once during that stupid streak, "I need a day off, no matter about the streak" I and many more people would have had much more respect for him. There comes a time to say "I need a break", and Ripken put his pride above it all. And that is not the example I would send to my teams. team comes first, always.
Like I asked the other guy, were you here during that time? Don't you remember the stories emanating from OPACY about teammates fed up with the way the streak took over the team, the resentment of many of the guys who surely would have been benched had they played the way Ripken was playing? For bleep sakes, talk to any media people(and I was one)about what went on in that clubhouse.
From 50 to 12, there's going to be a lot of flip flops, these guys could fit in anywhere. But the top ten, the best there ever was for the O's, well, let's see(since all of you are going to roast me anyway, and remember I'm a paraplegic, be nice)
10.The Booger, John Wesley Powell
- Gentleman Jim Gentile
- Mike Cuellar
- Dave MacNally
- Singy
- Ripken
- Frank Robby
- Cakes
- Eddie
- Brooks
by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
Ripken was not as good of a hitter as Murray. Murray also wasn't an Oriole as long as Ripken, and doesn't have the Orioles numbers Ripken has.
Jim Gentile is in no way, shape, or form a top 10 player in Orioles history. I like that Cuellar and McNally are somehow better than Mike Mussina, too.
Thanks for the time that you've given me...
by SC on Dec 21, 2007 5:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what the shit?
"It would behoove the Orioles to play better." - Jim Palmer
by 2632 on Dec 17, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
aoufdouafhuaf
dafjafefe
that's what happened when i hit my head on the keyboard from reading that crap
by dfleis on Dec 17, 2007 1:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
makes sense
by lookouts400 on Dec 17, 2007 5:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
makes sense
by birdman on Dec 17, 2007 7:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and fwiw...
by jq higgins on Dec 18, 2007 6:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
in fact...
As for Cal Ripken Jr., welcome to flavor country. His 129.2 JAWS score places him second behind only [Honus]Wagner among shortstops, and 15th overall in major league history. He's 16th based on career WARP, and an even more impressive 10th according to peak. Chew on that for a moment: we're talking about one of the 20 greatest players in baseball history, a player who's seventh-best season was worth 9.7 wins, good enough to win an MVP award in some years. Of course, given his membership in the 3,000 hit club, his record 2,632 consecutive games, and the most home runs by a shortstop, Ripken's a no-doubt choice for the Hall of Fame; he'll be close to unanimous.
The most interesting part of Ripken's candidacy may be the fact that he changed the game. I'm not talking about the feel-good aura produced by his run at Lou Gehrig's consecutive game streak, which is often credited for bringing fans back to baseball after the 1994-'95 players strike. It was his success at shortstop despite being 6'4", 225 lbs which opened the door for other big, athletic types like Jeter, A-Rod, and Tejada to play the position, a development which played no small part in moving the game more towards the high-offense era in which we currently sit. Roll over, Concepcion, and tell Mark Belanger the news.
None of which takes away from his fielding. Ripken had five seasons where he was at least 20 runs above average in the field, and including his latter-day move to third base, eight in double digits. Those years lead to some staggering WARP totals: 17.0 in 1991 (an MVP year, and the fourth-highest single-season WARP total ever), 15.0 in 1984, 13.9 in '83 (his first MVP award while playing for his only World Series winner). In his first 10 full seasons, he averaged 11.4 WARP... and I could go on. But I'll sum it up thusly: according to JAWS, he's the strongest candidate to grace the ballot since Hank Aaron.
You heard that right. Oh, and in case you're wondering who the #3 shortstop is according to JAWS, the one left out of the rankings above, it's the guy slagged on a daily basis in the tri-state area: Alex Rodriguez (112.5).
by jq higgins on Dec 18, 2007 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's awesome, jq
by Stacey on Dec 19, 2007 7:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
though...
by jq higgins on Dec 19, 2007 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












