Payton to Chicago with Roberts?
OK, so two disclaimers: Heyman is frequently full of shit and this is pretty thin on details. Nonetheless, here goes:
According to Heyman, Payton may be accompanying Roberts to Chicago, which is great. Redman is just about as good for a fourth outfielder, and way the hell cheaper. I thought Chicago already had four outfielders, but hey, not our problem. Hopefully this happens and nets us a whole slew of prospects... even though I will miss B-Rob. Also, I would love to see us pull Sean Hill if adding Payton makes that viable.
Update [2008-3-4 5:57:7 by punkrawka]: Sean Hill is not a person. I meant Rich Hill.
FanPosts are user-created content and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Camden Chat or SB Nation. They might, though.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good God...
What are the chances we can get Cedeno AND Eric Patterson? Neither are ever gonna be special players...but I'd rather see them in the MI than Hernandez/Fahey.
This is a title
I'm really excited at the prospect of shipping them off together. Although, mlbtraderumors.com is suggesting that the Cubs may send Marquis over in the same deal...which I'm not too hot about. However, it could be a good deal if none of the options for fifth starter pan out. Plug Marquis in until some team's rotation struggles or is riddled with injuries and trade he and Trachsel for prospects.
Lastly, Cedeno is not a better option then Hernendez. He's a butcher at short and second and the outfield. The guy can't field and he doesn't hit. His average will probably be around .230 in the AL East with a low OBP, and you'll get roughly the same output from Hernendez with a much better glove. Not to mention the stress pitchers must be under knowing that any ball hit to short is a risk for a blunder by Cedeno.
I've heard good things about Patterson, however. He might be a good option at second with Hernendez at short.
Cedeno's AAA numbers
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 3, 2008 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Oi
Why is it that folks are bashing Cabrera for not putting it together but are suggesting the Os trade for Cedeno who is the same kind of underachieving player as Cabrera? Do we want two guys who can't figure it out?
Cedeno
So, do we want the offense or the defense? I'd say stick with Luis Hernandez.
Dreams and hopes
Personally, I think keeping Hernendez at short and having Cedeno at second wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. You want to have a good glove at short. Second is important, but short is a necessity. I'm still up for Eric Patterson or trading for a veteran. Heck, package some dudes up and send them to Colorado for whomever doesn't get the second base spot. They have a race out there with Jayson Nix, Marcus Giles, Jeff Baker, Clint Barmes, and Omar Quintanilla. Barmes would be nice, Nix would be better, and the name Quintanilla is just fantastic sounding. Try saying it. Quintanilla. BAM!
Barmes would be nice?

Gone but not forgotten...
b/c
by jq higgins on Mar 4, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions
re:

Gone but not forgotten...
Shawn Hill...
by Dave at Bottomfeeder Baseball on Mar 6, 2008 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
Why they'd take Payton
wake me up when the trade is done
Rocky Cherry, O's pitcher, not John C. McGinley's love child.
Agreed
this is going to happen

MelMo happy again!!
Roberts
Rocky Cherry, O's pitcher, not John C. McGinley's love child.
re
I think if we include Payton...
I'm so fucking tired of these rumors though. Either make the trade or don't. And if Roberts is considered for a trade in July, I hope there are teams with middle infield prospects.
Ryan Sanberg is making a comeback?
have we
All the ones I remember and up shitty for the O's
John Parrish for Scott Moore and Rocky Cherry
We sent Parrish to Seattle...
by KenDixonFanClub on Mar 3, 2008 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
What did we get for Parrish?
Actually
Rocky Cherry, O's pitcher, not John C. McGinley's love child.
sebastien boucher
by jq higgins on Mar 4, 2008 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
steve trachsel
Who'd we get for Hairston? Was that Sosa?
by dfa on Mar 3, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, Sosa
Rich Hill
by Wade Boggs Hair on Mar 4, 2008 10:01 AM EST reply actions
Matt Murton
by Wade Boggs Hair on Mar 4, 2008 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
re:murton
by BENNYBIRDMAN on Mar 4, 2008 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
Hill and Marmol would be great, but...
I'm torn on Murton. Both Murton and Scott are at a place in their careers where they need a shot at playing every day. I guess I'd prefer Murton over Scott, but he's not that much younger and doesn't have much more upside.
I'd rather add another younger player to the deal. Someone on the other side of 25.
by silverstadium on Mar 4, 2008 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah...but
If we deal Roberts...
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/the-ten-worst-leadoff-hitters-since-1957/
We still don't know who will bat leadoff if this goes down.
Cedeno/Patterson? Better suited for the bottom of the order. Oops...Luis is there.
Mora? He still gets on base reasonably well (for this team) and, I bet you didn't know this about him--he can lay down a bunt.
Millar has the OBP but Trembley would never dream of it.
How about someone who hasn't been mentioned much: Nick. He can get on base. He's shown that he can steal a base, something Trembley cares about. He's definitely not the ideal choice, but who is?
re:
Mora: HE'S A VET'RAN. HE HITS SECOND 'CAUSE HE LIKESTA. HE EARNED THAT. HE HAS BEEN TO THE PLAYOFFS!
Millar: WHAT! HE'S FAT. AND SUSPICIOUSLY WISHES TO HAVE A BEARD, POTENTIALLY SPREADING DYSENTERY AMONGST THE RANKS!
Markakis: WHY THAT'D HURT HIS ARE BEE EYES.
Hernandez: THAT YOUNGSTER IS A GLOVESMAN, NOT A BATSMAN!
Fahey: I LIKE HIS ATTITUDE. HE GOES TO GET'EM. HE'S A GO-GETTER. HE PLAYS SECOND BASE. HE IS OBVIOUSLY A FINE HUMAN BEING, BECAUSE HE SURE SUCKS AT BASEBALL. BUT GOSH FART IT ALL HE TRIES HARD. HE'LL BUNT THE RUNNERS OVER IF WE'RE IN A TIGHT SPOT!
(What runners?)
SHET IT!

Gone but not forgotten...

by 

















